On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:49:14AM +0200, lifrsc.m.klsw...@spamgourmet.com wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote: > > > > I'm also puzzled why anyone would build 6.3 now. It's old. > > > > ĸen > Maybe because the last stable version of BLFS is BLFS 6.3 ? > > Klaus Sure it is. But, most of the time people can use development BLFS without problems.
I know, lots of that is still very old - lack of editors with time on their hands - and that oldness will itself give problems. I've posted in the past about the versions I was using around last October - apart from security upgrades I haven't upgraded much - and about kde-4.2. Deliberately building an old LFS to follow verbatim what is in a released BLFS isn't a good plan. Sorry, lack of time to respond more fully - I'm expecting a service call from the people formerly known as nthell, and I expect they'll replace my set top box - from past experience I'll be offline for several days trying to build a 'supported' system to 'register' the new box. ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
