Emerson Yesupatham gmail.com> writes:
>
>
> Hi Team,
>
> I am seeing a test fauilure in LFS-Boot-7.0, Section 6.22 (E2fsprogs-1.41.14).
>
> Out of 107 tests, 1 test got failed.
>
> I have checked the reference test logs present at
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/build-logs/7.0/core2du
I experienced a similar failure where
both e_icount_normal and e_icount_opt
reported failed tests and complained
about a test_icount file or directory
missing.
I removed the source folder for e2fsprogs
and re-did the install at which point I
realized that I had mis-typed one of the
configurati
Emerson Yesupatham wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
>
> Sorry for the late reply.
>
> Bruce wrote:
>
>>> BTW, I have three drives, sda, sdb, and sdc. sdc is a SSD an dI
>>> generally boot from that:
>>> /dev/sdc1 on / type ext4 (rw,noatime,discard,data=writeback)
>>> proc on /proc type proc (rw,noexec,nosui
Hi Bruce,
Sorry for the late reply.
Bruce wrote:
>>BTW, I have three drives, sda, sdb, and sdc. sdc is a SSD an dI
>>generally boot from that:
>>/dev/sdc1 on / type ext4 (rw,noatime,discard,data=writeback)
>>proc on /proc type proc (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev)
>>sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw,noexe
Em 18-08-2012 16:21, Emerson Yesupatham escreveu:
...
> My host PC is Fedora 14.
> It has two Hard disks.
> /dev/sda has Fedora 14 (/dev/sda1 is /boot partition in Host PC)
> /dev/sdb has LFS-7.0 (/dev/sdb3 is / partition (LFS is located))
>
> I can say I have skipped Section 8.4 (Using Grub to
chen wang wrote:
> 2012/8/19 Emerson Yesupatham
>> Now question is, Can I use this type configuration (that is Two hard
>> disks) to proceed with BLFS/CLFS?
Yes. Very few applications care where a specific partition is mounted.
that is it doesn't matter if / is mounted on hda, sdb, or some o
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 04:57:44PM +0800, chen wang wrote:
> 2012/8/19 Emerson Yesupatham
>
> > Hi Team,
> >
> > I could successfully finish all the chapters in BOOK-7.0 and able to boot
> > my LFS successfully !!.
> > I have registerd myself as LFS user ! Thanks for all your support.
> >
> > I a
2012/8/19 Emerson Yesupatham
> Hi Team,
>
> I could successfully finish all the chapters in BOOK-7.0 and able to boot
> my LFS successfully !!.
> I have registerd myself as LFS user ! Thanks for all your support.
>
> I am planning to use the same LFS-7.0 as base for further work may be BLFS
> and
Hi Team,
I could successfully finish all the chapters in BOOK-7.0 and able to boot
my LFS successfully !!.
I have registerd myself as LFS user ! Thanks for all your support.
I am planning to use the same LFS-7.0 as base for further work may be BLFS
and CLFS. I would like to explain my current sys
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 12:13:12AM +0530, Emerson Yesupatham wrote:
>
> Hi Ken,
> >> Unfortunately, those only tell use about the distro, not about your
> >>machine.
> Emerson: In case I need to provide info about my Host PC HW, which command
> I should execute? Curious to know. WIll "lspci -v" be
Hi Team,
Thanks a lot for all your feedback. I have gone through them, below is
summary of my understanding and things I have planned to do:
1. I will try to configure minimal kernel which shall boot and enter into
LFS. For this, mainly I will focus on Block drivers and Filesystem drivers.
Later
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:11:41AM +0530, Emerson Yesupatham wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> I am currently working on Section 8.3 of Book 7.0. Section is about Linux
> 3.1 compilation.
>
> I am new to kernel compilation from Scratch. Book recommends to do the
> kernel compilation from Scratch, is there an
Emerson Yesupatham wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> I am currently working on Section 8.3 of Book 7.0. Section is about Linux
> 3.1 compilation.
>
> I am new to kernel compilation from Scratch. Book recommends to do the
> kernel compilation from Scratch, is there any online material to go through
> or I shoul
On Aug 13, 2012, at 13:41 PM, Emerson Yesupatham wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> I am currently working on Section 8.3 of Book 7.0. Section is about
> Linux 3.1 compilation.
>
> I am new to kernel compilation from Scratch. Book recommends to do
> the kernel compilation from Scratch, is there any online
Emerson Yesupatham wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> I am seeing a test fauilure in LFS-Boot-7.0, Section 6.22
> (E2fsprogs-1.41.14).
>
> Out of 107 tests, 1 test got failed.
>
> I have checked the reference test logs present at
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/build-logs/7.0/core2duo/test-logs/085-e2fspr
Hi Team,
I am seeing a test fauilure in LFS-Boot-7.0, Section 6.22
(E2fsprogs-1.41.14).
Out of 107 tests, 1 test got failed.
I have checked the reference test logs present at
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/build-logs/7.0/core2duo/test-logs/085-e2fsprogs,
all the 107 tests are passed here.
avinash kumar wrote:
> I get these errors when i run tests after Make:
> make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/posix/bug-regex32.out] Error 1
> make[2]: [/sources/glibc-build/posix/annexc.out] Error 1 (ignored)
> make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/nptl/tst-attr3.out] Error 1
> make[2]: *** [/source
1, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Eleanore Boyd
mailto:cara...@cox.net>> wrote:
On 7/31/2012 9:03 AM, avinash kumar wrote:
Hello,
I am using lfs-book-7.0. I get following error while
building glibc-2.14.1 , section-6.9.1 in book ,
m
r the attachment to find what it was
>> doing when it failed. Let me know if more information is required.
>> Meanwhile I ll check if binutils was installed fine.
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Eleanore Boyd wrote:
>>
>>> On 7/31/2012 9:03 AM, avinash k
2012 at 7:40 PM, Eleanore Boyd wrote:
>
>> On 7/31/2012 9:03 AM, avinash kumar wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am using lfs-book-7.0. I get following error while building
>> glibc-2.14.1 , section-6.9.1 in book ,
>>
>>
>> make[3]:
>> /mnt/lfs/too
ote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am using lfs-book-7.0. I get following error while building glibc-2.14.1
> , section-6.9.1 in book ,
>
>
> make[3]:
> /mnt/lfs/tools/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.6.1/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ar:
> Command not found
>
> Any rel
On 7/31/2012 9:03 AM, avinash kumar wrote:
Hello,
I am using lfs-book-7.0. I get following error while building
glibc-2.14.1 , section-6.9.1 in book ,
make[3]:
/mnt/lfs/tools/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.6.1/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ar:
Command not found
Any relevant help
Hello,
I am using lfs-book-7.0. I get following error while building glibc-2.14.1
, section-6.9.1 in book ,
make[3]:
/mnt/lfs/tools/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.6.1/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ar:
Command not found
Any relevant help would be greatly appreciated.
--
Thank you
Hi, All.
Thanks for all your feedback. It was nice learning about Hard links. I have
put my response inline for Ken's point.
>>Message: 3
>>Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 16:18:51 +0100
>>From: Ken Moffat
>>Subject: Re: [lfs-support] LFS-BOOk-7.0:Section:5.2 Tool Chain
On 07/16/2012 11:47 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Eleanore Boyd wrote:
>
>> The compilation process creates the hard links, so there is no need to
>> manually create links.
> Correct.
>
>> If anything, creating links beforehand may cause
>> errors due to the links pointing nowhere.
> LOL. You can't cre
Eleanore Boyd wrote:
> The compilation process creates the hard links, so there is no need to
> manually create links.
Correct.
> If anything, creating links beforehand may cause
> errors due to the links pointing nowhere.
LOL. You can't create a hard link that points to nowhere. You could
c
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 09:23:13AM -0500, Eleanore Boyd wrote:
> On 7/16/2012 9:10 AM, Emerson Yesupatham wrote:
> >
> >"Binutils installs its assembler and linker in two locations,
> >/tools/bin and /tools/$LFS_TGT/bin. The tools
> >in one location are hard linked to the other."
> >/tools/bin and
On 7/16/2012 9:10 AM, Emerson Yesupatham wrote:
Hi,
I am following Book 7.0. In Section 5.2 Toolchain Technical Notes, the
following is mentioned:
"Binutils installs its assembler and linker in two locations,
/tools/bin and /tools/$LFS_TGT/bin. The tools
in one location are hard linked to
Hi,
I am following Book 7.0. In Section 5.2 Toolchain Technical Notes, the
following is mentioned:
"Binutils installs its assembler and linker in two locations, /tools/bin
and /tools/$LFS_TGT/bin. The tools
in one location are hard linked to the other."
/tools/bin and /tools/$LFS_TGT/bin should b
Emerson Yesupatham wrote:
> The higher the version number is, the less compatibility code is
> added, and the faster the code gets.
I'm not sure about that. It gets smaller, but I doubt it gets faster.
At least not enough to be perceptible.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/l
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 08:02:43PM +0530, Emerson Yesupatham wrote:
>
> Emerson: Yes, this is my first build. I thought the value for
> --enable-kernel must be the "same" as Host systems linux version (uname -r).
> Now, I did little bit research on --enable-kernel option and found the
> following
Hi Ken,
Apologize for doing a top-post. I was not aware of it. Now I have provided
my reply in interleaved post.
> An now, to answer your question. If this is your first build of
>LFS, I'm tempted to say FBBG (Follow Book, Book Good). So, that
>would be --enable-kernel=2.6.25 (I'm looking at LFS
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 02:16:18PM -0700, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> Em 01-07-2012 15:32, Ken Moffat escreveu:
> > On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 01:16:00PM +0530, Emerson Yesupatham wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > If you are never going to boot a kernel older than
> > 2.6.35, specifying 2.6.35 should be fin
Em 01-07-2012 15:32, Ken Moffat escreveu:
> On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 01:16:00PM +0530, Emerson Yesupatham wrote:
[...]
> If you are never going to boot a kernel older than
> 2.6.35, specifying 2.6.35 should be fine.
>
> For my own desktop builds (several each year, using LFS-svn) I
> reduce the
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 01:16:00PM +0530, Emerson Yesupatham wrote:
> Hi Andy and All,
>
> As discussed in below mail, I have now installed latest linux distribution
> in my Host computer to have newer kernel. The installed linux version
> details are as follows:
>
> #cat /proc/version
> Linux v
subject or body 'help' to
>>lfs-support-requ...@linuxfromscratch.org
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>lfs-support-ow...@linuxfromscratch.org
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more spe
t;Re: Contents of lfs-support digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. LFS-BOOK-7.0 Section 5.9 binutils pass2 doubt
> (Emerson Yesupatham)
> 2. Re: LFS-BOOK-7.0 Section 5.9 binutils pass2 doubt (Eleanore Boyd)
> 3. Re: LFS-BOOK-7.0 Section 5.9 binutils
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 18:09:21 +0100
Emerson Yesupatham wrote:
> *My host system violates one of the prerequisites mentioned in page XVi*
>
> *Linux Kernel-2.6.25 *
So what are you saying, that your kernel is older than 2.6.25?
Glibc is configured with --enable-kernel=2.6.25 so if you try to use
On 6/19/2012 12:09 PM, Emerson Yesupatham wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to build LFS. I am following LFS-BOOK-7.0.pdf.
Problem:
I am facing the following error while compiling Binutils-2.21.1a -
Pass 2, section 5.9.
" *configure: error: cannot run C compiled programs.*" Complete error
is a
ith my simple problem. I would like to repeat my
> formative (and successful) experience with LFS-book 6.8 building,
> using the much waited LFS-book 7.0 stable on my 64bit PC. Have you any
> idea about the date when it will be downloadable? Many thanks.
> --
> http://linuxfromscratch.org/
Sorry to disturb with my simple problem. I would like to repeat my
formative (and successful) experience with LFS-book 6.8 building,
using the much waited LFS-book 7.0 stable on my 64bit PC. Have you any
idea about the date when it will be downloadable? Many thanks.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org
41 matches
Mail list logo
