On 02/17/2014 12:14 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>
> It is a very good work, would have saved me some days, perhaps months,
> as the first build, I gave up, in the past. Thanks.
>
> Optional, for "VMware virtual machines": it could be interpreted
> incorrectly as optional for VM... I would thi
Em 16-02-2014 12:49, Armin K. escreveu:
> On 02/16/2014 02:38 AM, Ken Moffat wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 01:04:12AM +0100, Armin K. wrote:
>>> Hello there,
>>>
>>> I have been spending my time on LFS IRC for a long time now and have
>>> noticed that most users who come for help there get stuc
On 02/16/2014 02:38 AM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 01:04:12AM +0100, Armin K. wrote:
>> Hello there,
>>
>> I have been spending my time on LFS IRC for a long time now and have
>> noticed that most users who come for help there get stuck at configuring
>> their kernel.
>>
>> Thus, I
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 01:04:12AM +0100, Armin K. wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> I have been spending my time on LFS IRC for a long time now and have
> noticed that most users who come for help there get stuck at configuring
> their kernel.
>
> Thus, I have written a rather basic guide on how to conf
Big thanks for You!
2014-02-16 0:04 GMT+00:00 Armin K. :
> Hello there,
>
> I have been spending my time on LFS IRC for a long time now and have
> noticed that most users who come for help there get stuck at configuring
> their kernel.
>
> Thus, I have written a rather basic guide on how to conf
Armin K. wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> I have been spending my time on LFS IRC for a long time now and have
> noticed that most users who come for help there get stuck at configuring
> their kernel.
>
> Thus, I have written a rather basic guide on how to configure the kernel
> to get your machine to bo
Hello there,
I have been spending my time on LFS IRC for a long time now and have
noticed that most users who come for help there get stuck at configuring
their kernel.
Thus, I have written a rather basic guide on how to configure the kernel
to get your machine to boot for the first time (disk co
John Black wrote:
> If I want to re-compile "linux-3.8.1" directory, should I do --> 'make
> mrproper" again?
No. Just change the configuration and run make.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe:
tain a devtmpfs filesystem to
> mount at /dev -
> I'm really sorry about that. If I want to re-compile "linux-3.8.1"
> directory, should I do --> 'make mrproper" again? if yess I think it
> means I have to start again from beginning for ker
> -Original Message-
> From: bruce.du...@gmail.com
> Sent: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 11:24:20 -0500
> To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Kernel configuration
>
> William Harrington wrote:
>>
>> On Jun 11, 2013, at 11:34 PM, John B
William Harrington wrote:
>
> On Jun 11, 2013, at 11:34 PM, John Black wrote:
>
>> Okay.. I will try to compile now if fail I will try again later. wiki
>> or book I think it's still confusing me, if there any cheat sheet for
>> kernel configuration, please let m
Alice Wonder wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-06-11 at 20:05 -0800, John Black wrote:
>> I'm confused about kernel configuration. What about I leave it by default
>> then compile it, it is fine for creating live cd at later time?
>>
>> ___
>
> I would look at some of t
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 08:49:57AM +0200, thorsten wrote:
> > As far as drivers, disable what you
> > don't need and enable what yo do need.
>
> > William Harrington
>
> Two hints I got some time ago, which helped me a lot:
>
> 1: get a recent distro, boot it up, do
>
> dmesg > dmesg.log,
> lo
> As far as drivers, disable what you
> don't need and enable what yo do need.
> William Harrington
Two hints I got some time ago, which helped me a lot:
1: get a recent distro, boot it up, do
dmesg > dmesg.log,
look at dmesg.log with eg. vim and look at the kernel bootmessages for
the hardwar
On Jun 11, 2013, at 11:34 PM, John Black wrote:
Okay.. I will try to compile now if fail I will try again later.
wiki or book I think it's still confusing me, if there any cheat
sheet for kernel configuration, please let me know about it.
No cheat sheets that I know of. Matter of
> -Original Message-
> From: kb0...@berzerkula.org
> Sent: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 23:14:40 -0500
> To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Kernel configuration
>
>
> On Jun 11, 2013, at 11:05 PM, John Black wrote:
>
>> I'm con
On Tue, 2013-06-11 at 20:05 -0800, John Black wrote:
> I'm confused about kernel configuration. What about I leave it by default
> then compile it, it is fine for creating live cd at later time?
>
> ___
I would look at some of the kernel configurations from mainline
distributi
On Jun 11, 2013, at 11:05 PM, John Black wrote:
> I'm confused about kernel configuration. What about I leave it by
> default then compile it, it is fine for creating live cd at later
> time?
>
For a lived you still need to configure a proper kernel for it.
I suggest yo
I'm confused about kernel configuration. What about I leave it by default then
compile it, it is fine for creating live cd at later time?
FREE 3D EARTH SCREENSAVER - Watch the Earth right on your desktop!
Check it out at
I'm building my LFS 7.3 with main purposes:
1. Live CD Xfce
2. English and Korean language interfaces
is there any specific kernel configuration for it?
Thank you for your attention.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ:
Baho Utot wrote:
> Dan McGhee wrote:
>
>> I have a Turion Dual Core Processer. I didn't not configure support for
>> multiprocessors when I did my new kernel and I load only one CPU. Is a
>> dual core processor a "multiprocessor" system as far as the linux kernel
>> goes? My friends accuse
Dan McGhee wrote:
> I have a Turion Dual Core Processer. I didn't not configure support for
> multiprocessors when I did my new kernel and I load only one CPU. Is a
> dual core processor a "multiprocessor" system as far as the linux kernel
> goes? My friends accuse me of being "rhetoric sensi
I have a Turion Dual Core Processer. I didn't not configure support for
multiprocessors when I did my new kernel and I load only one CPU. Is a
dual core processor a "multiprocessor" system as far as the linux kernel
goes? My friends accuse me of being "rhetoric sensitive." :)
Thanks,
Dan
--
Trent Shea wrote:
>
> You're wondering if you can get the kernel config file from another machine?
> If so, I cant' see any reason not to; I've done it a number of times, I'd
> just
> make sure that it gets created from the same kernel version.
Yes, that's what I thought. I "made" the configur
On Wednesday 08 April 2009 13:19:12 you wrote:
> Trent Shea wrote:
> > On Wednesday 08 April 2009 12:11:29 Mike McCarty wrote:
> >> I'd like to try jhalfs. I tried
> >> earlier, and even though I told it not to build the kernel, it
> >> insisted that it needed the .config for it.
> >
> > What versi
Trent Shea wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 April 2009 12:11:29 Mike McCarty wrote:
>> I'd like to try jhalfs. I tried
>> earlier, and even though I told it not to build the kernel, it
>> insisted that it needed the .config for it.
>
> What version of jhalfs are you using? I've been using svn for a number
On Wednesday 08 April 2009 12:11:29 Mike McCarty wrote:
> I'd like to try jhalfs. I tried
> earlier, and even though I told it not to build the kernel, it
> insisted that it needed the .config for it.
What version of jhalfs are you using? I've been using svn for a number of
months (currently, 352
Is kernel configuration something which can be run not on the
target system? I'm not referring to a cross-build. I don't have
easy access to the information necessary to do the configuration
right now on the target machine. I'd like to try jhalfs. I tried
earlier, and even though I
> That implies you are using LFS-6.2. I'm afraid I think glibc-2.3.6
> is now regarded as "very old".
>
> I don't know what to recommend - LFS-6.3 is about to become "old",
> hopefully within the next 3 weeks, but as I said in a different
> thread I expect there to be a *lot* of breakage with t
On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 05:49:52PM +0100, Wolfgang Messingschlager wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
> >>
> > That implies you are using LFS-6.2. I'm afraid I think glibc-2.3.6
> > is now regarded as "very old".
> >
> > I don't know what to recommend - LFS-6.3 is about to become "old",
> > hopefully w
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 06:10:50PM +, Richard Melville wrote:
>>> I've never looked at VLC. Looking at /usr/include/linux seems
>>> a reasonable thing for a configure script to be doing. Which kernel
>>> headers did you use when building glibc, and what is now reported to
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 06:10:50PM +, Richard Melville wrote:
>
> > I've never looked at VLC. Looking at /usr/include/linux seems
> > a reasonable thing for a configure script to be doing. Which kernel
> > headers did you use when building glibc, and what is now reported to
> > be missing-a
> I've never looked at VLC. Looking at /usr/include/linux seems
> a reasonable thing for a configure script to be doing. Which kernel
> headers did you use when building glibc, and what is now reported to
> be missing-and-required ?
>
Ken
I believe that my original kernel headers were 2.6.1
Richard Melville wrote:
>> Yes, I think you've missed the important thing ;) The kernel
>> headers are what glibc was compiled against, and they should not be
>> changed unless you upgrade glibc [ and before anyone misconstrues
>> that, we *don't* support upgrading glibc - when the time comes,
>>
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 01:11:35PM +, Richard Melville wrote:
>
> > Yes, I think you've missed the important thing ;) The kernel
> > headers are what glibc was compiled against, and they should not be
> > changed unless you upgrade glibc [ and before anyone misconstrues
> > that, we *don't*
> Yes, I think you've missed the important thing ;) The kernel
> headers are what glibc was compiled against, and they should not be
> changed unless you upgrade glibc [ and before anyone misconstrues
> that, we *don't* support upgrading glibc - when the time comes,
> build a new system ].
>
>
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 10:13:01PM -0700, Rob Thornton wrote:
> This is my second time through LFS. The first with LFS 6.3 and now
> through LFS SVN. I have a couple questions on installing and configuring
> the Linux kernel...
>
> 1) When enabling ALSA support, should the LFS book not recommend
This is my second time through LFS. The first with LFS 6.3 and now
through LFS SVN. I have a couple questions on installing and configuring
the Linux kernel...
1) When enabling ALSA support, should the LFS book not recommend that
the card drivers be loaded as modules so when updated versions of
Wilco Beekhuizen wrote:
> This kernel panic can be right if the kernel can't access your HD. If
> I'm correct (but I'm not on a Linux box right now) the drivers are in
> Device Driver -> ATA Support -> SATA, or somewhere near the SCSI
> options. In any case look inside the device drivers.
>
> 2007
gt; Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 16:43:57 +0100
> From: "Wilco Beekhuizen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: I need some kernel configuration help.
> To: "LFS Support List"
> Message-ID:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/pl
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: I need some kernel configuration help.
To: "LFS Support List"
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
It seems like this is your sata controller: ATI Technologies Inc 4379
Serial ATA Controller
(
LFS.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: root [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 5:23 PM
> To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
> Subject: I need some kernel configuration help.
>
> I know I am missing device driver(s) for my SATA hard drive in
]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 5:23 PM
To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: I need some kernel configuration help.
I know I am missing device driver(s) for my SATA hard drive in my laptop
but I don't know what. Here is the output of lspci on my host system
(Fedora 7). I spent the l
43 matches
Mail list logo
