Thanks, the problem was the SATA drivers that were not installed, after I
installed them the problem dissapeared.
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 7:28 AM, 赵小强 wrote:
> you can add rootdelay=10 arter root=/dev/sda4.this make the kernel wait
> 10 second before it try ro mount the root .during this time,i
you can add rootdelay=10 arter root=/dev/sda4.this make the kernel wait 10
second before it try ro mount the root .during this time,it can realise what
sda4 is.
2009-09-22
赵小强
发件人： RaptorX
发送时间： 2009-08-03 01:28:24
收件人： LFS Support List
抄送：
主题： Re: Kenel Panic
Thanks guys for
> check your bios setings and be shure to have it setup correct. sata must
>> be native, not raid or whatever other options are available. ahci
>> usually is only available in native mode.
>
>
> This should be optional right?
yes.
> this is in case I want to use the AHCI drivers... am I correc
Thank you so much guys for your help!
I was able to boot my system for the first time. :D
I just have to fix a minor glitch with my keymap, since for some reason I
cannot type the letter "i" but i can type it with shift and caps, after that
I will get prepared to follow up with BSLFS.
Thanks agai
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 11:48 PM, Tobias Gasser wrote:
> > now, I have a SATA drive 250GB, and my usb of 4GB. Those are the two
> > HardDrives that my pc should recognice.
>
> > CONFIG_SATA_PMP=y
> > CONFIG_SATA_AHCI=y
>
> you probably don't have the right sata driver.
>
> the only one you're bui
> now, I have a SATA drive 250GB, and my usb of 4GB. Those are the two
> HardDrives that my pc should recognice.
> CONFIG_SATA_PMP=y
> CONFIG_SATA_AHCI=y
you probably don't have the right sata driver.
the only one you're building is the generic AHCI driver which supports
most of the newer sata c
here the attachment, i forgot to upload it
grep.out
Description: Binary data
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
> > Looking back at your fstab post to Bruce. Your root is listed as auto,
> I've
> > never used this before, have you had any luck with:
> > /dev/sda4 / ext3 defaults1 1
> I just tried on my system with auto. Pretty cool.
>
>
> I've attached a file with grep -i ata .con
On Sunday 02 August 2009 12:14:02 Trent Shea wrote:
> You're right GRUB looks fine. I've never had to alter grub/menu.lst with
> usb devices connected, but you never know. I've run into very similar
> errors when root=uuid and switching to root=/dev/blah has fixed it.
I just tried to booting with
I just double checked my kernel config and I do have Serial ATA and Parallel
ATA enabled and not as a module, so my SATA disk should have its drivers
loaded.
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 7:42 PM, RaptorX wrote:
> not really look at my previous post (we cross-posted here.)
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at
not really look at my previous post (we cross-posted here.)
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Trent Shea wrote:
> On Sunday 02 August 2009 11:36:12 Trent Shea wrote:
> > Those should probably be sdb?
> >
> > Trent.
> Actually, looking back are you trying to boot off the usb drive? If so,
> you'll
good question...
well look, first, BIOS is setup to load my usb first, Im using EXTLINUX
there and I have an option to boot from HDD...
in Slax, Slackware, and lilo all of them are *sda[1-4]*
grub is the only one who i had to make some changes because it took my usb
as hd0.
I actually can boot
On Sunday 02 August 2009 11:36:12 Trent Shea wrote:
> Those should probably be sdb?
>
> Trent.
Actually, looking back are you trying to boot off the usb drive? If so, you'll
probably need to compile all the usb support into the kernel too.
Trent.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/
On Sunday 02 August 2009 11:27:55 RaptorX wrote:
> > title Slackware
> > root (hd1,1)
> > kernel /boot/vmlinuz-custom root=/dev/sda2
> >
> > title LFS 6.4
> > root (hd1,3)
> > kernel /boot/vmlinuz root=/dev/sda4
Those should probably be sdb?
Trent.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo
Thanks Simon for pointing out, I will check this afternoon if booting right
now doesnt work.
--
[Temet Nosce]
+++
The ideas-about-reality are mistakenly labeled "reality" and usually people
are forever perplexed by the fact that other people, especially other
cultures, see "reality" di
Thanks guys for all the answers!
I enabled EXT2 and still got the Kernel Panic, but this time i did take the
time to note down the error, here is what i got:
md: Autodetecting RAID arrays
> md: Sanned 0 and added 0 devices
> md: Autorun ...
> md: ... Autorun DONE
>
> Root-NFS: no NFS server a
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 01:43 +0200, RaptorX wrote:
> I suspect it has something to do with the file system, maybe my kernel
> is not supporting it since I put reiserfs, xfs and jfs as modules in
> the kernel!
From your other post, it looks like the filesystem is fine - the disk is
ext3, and you've
On Sunday 02 August 2009 08:57:20 Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> RaptorX wrote:
> > #
> > # File systems
> > #
> > # CONFIG_EXT2_FS is not set
>
> I think this is your problem. ext3 depends on ext2.
>
>-- Bruce
I've build LFS a few times and each time I didn't select both ext2 and ext3,
just selected
RaptorX wrote:
> #
> # File systems
> #
> # CONFIG_EXT2_FS is not set
I think this is your problem. ext3 depends on ext2.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
*/dev/sda4 is ext3*
*
fstab reads as follows:*
# file system mountpoint typeoptions
dumpfsck
#
order
/dev/sda4 /auto
defaults 1 1
/dev/sda1 swap swap
pri=1
RaptorX wrote:
> Hi guys~
>
> I just finished building my first LFS 6.4.
>
> Everything was smooth except for the loading of the LFS system.
> I suspect that i did not configure my kernel correctly and I would like some
> help on determining if that is true.
>
> The cause of the Kernel Panic is
Hi guys~
I just finished building my first LFS 6.4.
Everything was smooth except for the loading of the LFS system.
I suspect that i did not configure my kernel correctly and I would like some
help on determining if that is true.
The cause of the Kernel Panic is that is trying to mount /dev/sda4
22 matches
Mail list logo
