On 10/26/10 02:52, Simon Geard wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 22:14 -0700, lfs wrote:
>> So the question is, Should I create the gcc-build directory and *then*
>> untar gmp,mpfr, mpc, from that(gcc-build) directory
> No. Remember the rule - before starting on a particular page, extract
> it's tar
>
> Editors, can we perhaps add some extra text to the GCC Pass 1
> instructions (and perhaps a short reminder to Pass 2 as well)? Right
> now, all the book has to say is:
>
> "GCC now requires the GMP, MPFR and MPC packages. As these
> packages may not be included in your host distribution,
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 22:14 -0700, lfs wrote:
> So the question is, Should I create the gcc-build directory and *then*
> untar gmp,mpfr, mpc, from that(gcc-build) directory
No. Remember the rule - before starting on a particular page, extract
it's tarball, and cd into the directory. So, when extr
On 10/22/10 16:04, Ken Moffat wrote:
> When you follow the instructions for *any* page in chapters 5 and
> 6, you should first untar any tarball specified (so,
> gcc-4.5.1.tar.bz2 in this case) *and then cd into the directory it
> creates*. If you remember that last part, the problem disappears.
lfs wrote:
> On 10/23/10 04:04, Andrew Benton wrote:
>> /tools is available in chroot, that's why we make the
>> /tools => /mnt/lfs/tools symlink. The programs are installed
>> into /tools, the linker links to it's libraries in /tools/lib. Then
>> when you're in chroot everything is in the right
On 10/23/10 04:04, Andrew Benton wrote:
> /tools is available in chroot, that's why we make the
> /tools => /mnt/lfs/tools symlink. The programs are installed
> into /tools, the linker links to it's libraries in /tools/lib. Then
> when you're in chroot everything is in the right place using the
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:21:58 -0700
Nolan <4030...@gmail.com> wrote:
> My question is, where are these installed? My first guess would be in
> /mnt/lfs/tools/{bin,lib}, would be be correct?
> As this is for pass2, they cannot be in the /tools directory, as it
> would not be available in the chroot
On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 08:59 -0700, Nolan wrote:
> Can I change the directory and file ownership to "lfs" with a chown, or
> is the fact that the programs were compiled as
> "root" have a detrimental effect?
The problem isn't that you're running as root - it's that you found that
you needed to run
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 03:21:58PM -0700, Nolan wrote:
> PING: Mike
> I might(should) have make it clearer, IIRC="[I]f [I] [R]emember
> [C]orrectly). :)
TXS 4 the clarification.I googled IRC jargon with no hits, but
found 26 IIRC's under acronyn finder.I like this one:
International Interpretat
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 10:51:48 +0100
Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 01:22:34 -0700
> Nolan <4030...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > This is now the error after I changed to user 'lfs'.
> >
> > AS: lfs
> >
> > l...@retired:~$ whoami
> > lfs
> > l...@retired:~$ cd /mnt/lfs/sources
> > l...@retir
Nolan wrote:
> I am now at unpacking, configuring && make && make installing the three
> files
> gmp, mpfr, and mpc.
In Chapter 5, follow the instructions. You *always* unpack the package
specified in the title, cd, and then follow the instructions. They are
not built separately.
> My ques
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 03:21:58PM -0700, Nolan wrote:
>
> I am now to 5.10.1 and have applied the gcc-startfiles patch, and it was
> successful.
> I am now at unpacking, configuring && make && make installing the three
> files
> gmp, mpfr, and mpc.
> My question is, where are these installed? M
On 10/22/2010 09:24 AM, Andrew Benton wrote:
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 08:59:55 -0700
Nolan<4030...@gmail.com> wrote:
IIRC ubuntu will not allow me to create anything in the native
environment without a 'sudo'.
Sure, so use sudo to create the user lfs, format and mount the
partition, cre
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:25:11AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Nolan wrote:
> > I am sure I followed the book. Will recheck my steps, and if need be
> > will start over with a reformat of my LFS parition.
> > IIRC ubuntu will not allow me to create anything in the native
> > environment without a
Nolan wrote:
> On 10/22/2010 02:51 AM, Andrew Benton wrote:
>> No, never. If you followed the book /tools would be owned (and hence
>> writable) by the user lfs. I would suggest that you start again.
>>
>> Andy
>>
> I am sure I followed the book. Will recheck my steps, and if need be
> will st
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 08:59:55 -0700
Nolan <4030...@gmail.com> wrote:
> IIRC ubuntu will not allow me to create anything in the native
> environment without a 'sudo'.
>
Sure, so use sudo to create the user lfs, format and mount the
partition, create the folders /mnt/lfs/sources and /mnt/lfs/tools,
On 10/22/2010 02:51 AM, Andrew Benton wrote:
>
> No, never. If you followed the book /tools would be owned (and hence
> writable) by the user lfs. I would suggest that you start again.
>
> Andy
>
I am sure I followed the book. Will recheck my steps, and if need be
will start over with a reform
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 01:22:34 -0700
Nolan <4030...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is now the error after I changed to user 'lfs'.
>
> AS: lfs
>
> l...@retired:~$ whoami
> lfs
> l...@retired:~$ cd /mnt/lfs/sources
> l...@retired:/mnt/lfs/sources$ SPECS=`dirname $($LFS_TGT-gcc
> -print-libgcc-file-name)
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 01:22:34 -0700
Nolan <4030...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/22/2010 12:54 AM, littlebat wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:35:18 -0700
> > Nolan<4030...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> I have tried everything I could think of to get this command to
> >> work...
> >>
> > It
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:35:18 -0700
Nolan <4030...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I have tried everything I could think of to get this command to
> work...
>
> Code:
> SPECS=`dirname $($LFS_TGT-gcc -print-libgcc-file-name)`/specs
> $LFS_TGT-gcc -dumpspecs | sed \
>
>-e 's@/lib\(64\)\?/ld@/tools&@g' \
On 10/22/2010 12:54 AM, littlebat wrote:
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:35:18 -0700
Nolan<4030...@gmail.com> wrote:
I have tried everything I could think of to get this command to
work...
It seems $LFS_TGT is missing in environment.
--
littlebat
Thanks littlebat
When I read about the
On 10/22/2010 12:54 AM, littlebat wrote:
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:35:18 -0700
Nolan<4030...@gmail.com> wrote:
I have tried everything I could think of to get this command to
work...
It seems $LFS_TGT is missing in environment.
--
littlebat
Here is the contents of .bashrc
set +h
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:35:18 -0700
Nolan <4030...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I have tried everything I could think of to get this command to
> work...
It seems $LFS_TGT is missing in environment.
--
littlebat
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscrat
I have tried everything I could think of to get this command to work...
Code:
SPECS=`dirname $($LFS_TGT-gcc -print-libgcc-file-name)`/specs
$LFS_TGT-gcc -dumpspecs | sed \
-e 's@/lib\(64\)\?/ld@/tools&@g' \
-e "/^\*cpp:$/{n;s,$, -isystem /tools/include,}"> $SPECS
echo "New specs file is: $
24 matches
Mail list logo
