For the benefit of anyone who may come across this thread after
experiencing similar errors:
Despite the disappointing check summary, I pressed on with the build and
was able to complete it successfully without further problems. Subsequent
packages tested well, and the resulting system booted with
On 12/25/2013 05:44 PM, Bob Elgie wrote:
> My apologies if I'm blindly overlooking something obvious.
>
> Among the patches needed to build 7.4 is a Perl libc patch. I can't see
> where this patch is applied; it is not mentioned in chapter 6.39.
>
> The only place I find instructions to apply it is
> From lfs-support-boun...@linuxfromscratch.org Wed Dec 25 16:49:33 2013
> Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2013 10:44:38 -0500
> From: Bob Elgie
> To: lfs-support
> Subject: [lfs-support] LFS 7.4 Patching Perl
>
>
>
> My apologies if I'm blindly overlooking something obvious.
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 10:44:38AM -0500, Bob Elgie wrote:
> My apologies if I'm blindly overlooking something obvious.
>
> Among the patches needed to build 7.4 is a Perl libc patch. I can't see
> where this patch is applied; it is not mentioned in chapter 6.39.
>
> The only place I find instruc
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Bob Elgie wrote:
> Among the patches needed to build 7.4 is a Perl libc patch. I can't see
> where this patch is applied; it is not mentioned in chapter 6.39.
>
> The only place I find instructions to apply it is in the French version of
> the svn build.
>
> Should
My apologies if I'm blindly overlooking something obvious.
Among the patches needed to build 7.4 is a Perl libc patch. I can't see
where this patch is applied; it is not mentioned in chapter 6.39.
The only place I find instructions to apply it is in the French version of
the svn build.
Should th
On Wed, 2013-12-18 at 16:16 +0100, loki wrote:
...
>
> This gets me to the point that it starts the kernel, finds sda,
> sdb,. states that it Failed to execute /init,
> sh: cannot set terminal process group (-1): Inappropiate ioctl for
> device
> sh: no job control in this shell
>
> and the
On Wed, 2013-12-18 at 14:31 -0600, William Harrington wrote:
> Don't optimize the bootloader. Grub doesn't need optimizations. No
> bootloader needs optimization from gcc. You are dealing, also, with
> assmebly that the authors write for the target platform. Segfaults
> commonly come from g
On Wed, 2013-12-18 at 16:00 -0600, Dan McGhee wrote:
> You're right about the GPT without UEFI. But, AFIK, the user must *make*
> the partition behave with the GUID's. But, again AFIK, if the firmware
> is MBR based, you're still limited to four primaries.
No, because under GPT, there's simply n
On 12/18/2013 05:54 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Dan McGhee wrote:
>> On 12/18/2013 04:09 PM, akhiezer wrote:
>>> And, again IIUYC re 'primaries': no such concept in GPT, at least not in
>>> pre-GPT sense; and in pre-GPT sense, yes, the spec only allows for 4
>>> primaries
>>> anyhow.
>> This is anoth
Dan McGhee wrote:
> On 12/18/2013 04:09 PM, akhiezer wrote:
>>> Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 16:00:11 -0600
>>> From: Dan McGhee
>>> To: LFS Support List
>>> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.4 - Chapter 8.4 - GRUB
>>>
>>> [...] But, AFIK, the
On 12/18/2013 04:09 PM, akhiezer wrote:
>> Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 16:00:11 -0600
>> From: Dan McGhee
>> To: LFS Support List
>> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.4 - Chapter 8.4 - GRUB
>>
>> [...] But, AFIK, the user must *make*
>> the partition behave
> Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 16:00:11 -0600
> From: Dan McGhee
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.4 - Chapter 8.4 - GRUB
>
.
.
> >>>
> >> You and I have similar attitudes, esp with regard to the "M-word." :)
>
> Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 15:44:17 -0600
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.4 - Chapter 8.4 - GRUB
>
.
.
>
> The trick for grub users is to get it to "look across" the
> > partitions without having t
On 12/18/2013 03:44 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Dan McGhee wrote:
>> On 12/18/2013 02:08 PM, loki wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2013-12-18 at 09:24 -0600, Dan McGhee wrote:
>>>
Are you trying to do this on a UEFI system?
Dan
>>> Nope. I'm not even sure that this old rig is EFI capable :) And
Dan McGhee wrote:
> On 12/18/2013 02:08 PM, loki wrote:
>> On Wed, 2013-12-18 at 09:24 -0600, Dan McGhee wrote:
>>
>>> Are you trying to do this on a UEFI system?
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>>
>> Nope. I'm not even sure that this old rig is EFI capable :) And secondly I'm
>> too lazy to learn it since for the
On 12/18/2013 02:08 PM, loki wrote:
On Wed, 2013-12-18 at 09:24 -0600, Dan McGhee wrote:
Are you trying to do this on a UEFI
system?
Dan
Nope. I'm not even sure that this old rig is EFI capa
On Dec 18, 2013, at 2:08 PM, loki wrote:
> Yup. -O3 -march=native. And that said, something comes into my mind
> that I've read somewhere that grub does not play well with -O3.
> Thanks. Will try that on Friday.
Don't optimize the bootloader. Grub doesn't need optimizations. No
bootloader
On Wed, 2013-12-18 at 09:24 -0600, Dan McGhee wrote:
> Are you trying to do this on a UEFI system?
>
> Dan
>
Nope. I'm not even sure that this old rig is EFI capable :) And secondly
I'm too lazy to learn it since for the servers that I use 4 primary
partitions is the most I'm going to use and
William Harrington wrote:
>
> On Dec 18, 2013, at 9:24 AM, Dan McGhee wrote:
>
>>> /usr/share/grub/grub-mkconfig_lib: line 53: 12058 Segmentation
>>> fault (core dumped) "${grub_probe}" -t fs "$path" > /dev/null
>>> 2>&1
>>> Path `/boot/grub' is not readable by GRUB on boot. Installation is
>>
On Dec 18, 2013, at 9:24 AM, Dan McGhee wrote:
>> /usr/share/grub/grub-mkconfig_lib: line 53: 12058 Segmentation
>> fault (core dumped) "${grub_probe}" -t fs "$path" > /dev/null
>> 2>&1
>> Path `/boot/grub' is not readable by GRUB on boot. Installation is
>> impossible. Aborting.
Did
On 12/18/2013 09:16 AM, loki wrote:
Heya,
having trouble setting up GRUB2.
Here's the setup:
Hardware: Pentium 4, 2x ATA HD 80GB, 512MB
Software RAID 1 (metadata v=1.2)
md0 (Boot)
md1 (Swap)
md2 (root)
Live-System: Xubuntu 12.04 (32-bit)
LFS 7.4
*Command (inside chroot): grub-install /dev/s
Heya,
having trouble setting up GRUB2.
Here's the setup:
Hardware: Pentium 4, 2x ATA HD 80GB, 512MB
Software RAID 1 (metadata v=1.2)
md0 (Boot)
md1 (Swap)
md2 (root)
Live-System: Xubuntu 12.04 (32-bit)
LFS 7.4
Command (inside chroot): grub-install /dev/sda
OUTPUT:
/usr/share/grub/grub-mkconfi
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 1:18 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>How much disk space do you have on your LFS partition? What
> kind of hardware are you building on? Is this in a virtual environment?
>
>-- Bruce
>
Not virtual.
Intel i7 950
6 Gb RAM
Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD5 motherboard
Linux debianmint
Bob Elgie wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 11:47 PM, Unix User
> wrote:
>
> Thank you, Seba, for spotting that. During Chapter 5 I did link sh to bash
> in the host. In Chapter 6, after the chroot, that link is invisible, isn't
> it? The only accessible shell is the bash in the toolchain, I belie
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 11:47 PM, Unix User wrote:
> Bob Elgie schrieb am 10:22 Dienstag, 17.Dezember
> 2013:
>
> I'm unhappy with the check summary for this package. After similar results
> on my first attempt, I executed
> >rm -Rf gcc-4.8.1/ gcc-build
> >and started the chapter again from the t
Bob Elgie schrieb am 10:22 Dienstag, 17.Dezember 2013:
I'm unhappy with the check summary for this package. After similar results on
my first attempt, I executed
>rm -Rf gcc-4.8.1/ gcc-build
>and started the chapter again from the top. These are selected summaries from
>attempt #2 alon
I'm unhappy with the check summary for this package. After similar results
on my first attempt, I executed
rm -Rf gcc-4.8.1/ gcc-build
and started the chapter again from the top. These are selected summaries
from attempt #2 along with a small selection of FAIL notifications:
=== g++ Summar
On 12/08/2013 01:08 AM, Frans de Boer wrote:
> On 12/07/2013 10:57 PM, William Harrington wrote:
>>
>> On Dec 5, 2013, at 2:43 PM, frozen tuesday wrote:
>>
>>> make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/math/test-float.out] Error 1
>>> make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/math/test-ldouble.out] Error 1
>>> m
On 12/07/2013 10:57 PM, William Harrington wrote:
>
> On Dec 5, 2013, at 2:43 PM, frozen tuesday wrote:
>
>> make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/math/test-float.out] Error 1
>> make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/math/test-ldouble.out] Error 1
>> make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/math/test-ifloat.ou
On Dec 5, 2013, at 2:43 PM, frozen tuesday wrote:
> make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/math/test-float.out] Error 1
> make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/math/test-ldouble.out] Error 1
> make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/math/test-ifloat.out] Error 1
These three used to fail unless the floating-
On 12/06/2013 08:43 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> frozen tuesday wrote:
>>> root:/sources/glibc-build# grep Error glibc-check-log
>>> make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/math/
>> test-float.out] Error 1
>>> make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/math/test-ldouble.out] Error 1
>>> make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc
frozen tuesday wrote:
>> root:/sources/glibc-build# grep Error glibc-check-log
>> make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/math/
> test-float.out] Error 1
>> make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/math/test-ldouble.out] Error 1
>> make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/math/test-ildoubl.out] Error 1
>> make[2]:
> root:/sources/glibc-build# grep Error glibc-check-log
> make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/math/
test-float.out] Error 1
> make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/math/test-ldouble.out] Error 1
> make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/math/test-ildoubl.out] Error 1
> make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/mat
frozen tuesday wrote:
> Hello all --
>
> I just ran "make" on Glibc in section 6.9. Using Linux Mint 15 on an Athlon
> XP 3200+ as my host system to build.
>
> When I ran the non-optional checks on Glibc using the commands:
>
> make -k check 2>&1 | tee glibc-check-log
> grep Error glibc-check-log
>
Hello all --
I just ran "make" on Glibc in section 6.9. Using Linux Mint 15 on an Athlon
XP 3200+ as my host system to build.
When I ran the non-optional checks on Glibc using the commands:
make -k check 2>&1 | tee glibc-check-log
grep Error glibc-check-log
Grep returned the following error me
On 12/03/2013 02:17 AM, Simon Geard wrote:
On Sat, 2013-11-30 at 23:47 +1300, Simon Geard wrote:
On Fri, 2013-11-29 at 19:49 -0500, Baho Utot wrote:
The following packages are the only ones I have found ( in Chapter 5 )
that either puts something into or requires /lib64
binutils-pass-1
gcc-pa
On Sat, 2013-11-30 at 23:47 +1300, Simon Geard wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-11-29 at 19:49 -0500, Baho Utot wrote:
> > The following packages are the only ones I have found ( in Chapter 5 )
> > that either puts something into or requires /lib64
> >
> > binutils-pass-1
> > gcc-pass-1
> > libstdc++
> > bi
On 12/02/2013 12:10 PM, William Harrington wrote:
> On Nov 29, 2013, at 11:06 AM, Baho Utot wrote:
>
>> Is it possible to build LFS-7.4 on x86_64 without the /lib64 symlink?
>>
>> I have tried to do so but libstd++ in the chapter 5 tool chain dies.
>>
>> I would like to build for x86_64 and have t
On Nov 29, 2013, at 11:06 AM, Baho Utot wrote:
> Is it possible to build LFS-7.4 on x86_64 without the /lib64 symlink?
>
> I have tried to do so but libstd++ in the chapter 5 tool chain dies.
>
> I would like to build for x86_64 and have the same filesystem layout
> that i686 has ie without the l
On 12/01/2013 06:27 PM, frozen tuesday wrote:
> >> Is it sufficient to sudo before every command in the rest of the book,
> >> or do I need to find a way to log in as the user "root"?
> > >
> > > Thanks.
>
> > You stay root anyway as long as you're in the chroot.
>
> I see the chroot is coming
You want to run these commands as root (by using sudo).
Douglas Reno
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
>> Is it sufficient to sudo before every command in the rest of the book,
>> or do I need to find a way to log in as the user "root"?
> >
> > Thanks.
> You stay root anyway as long as you're in the chroot.
I see the chroot is coming up in 6.4 but before that here are some commands
that need to be
On Fri, 2013-11-29 at 19:49 -0500, Baho Utot wrote:
> The following packages are the only ones I have found ( in Chapter 5 )
> that either puts something into or requires /lib64
>
> binutils-pass-1
> gcc-pass-1
> libstdc++
> binutils-pass-2
> gcc-pass-2
By /lib64, you mean /tool/lib64, given we'
On Fri, 2013-11-29 at 12:06 -0500, Baho Utot wrote:
> Is it possible to build LFS-7.4 on x86_64 without the /lib64 symlink?
It's possible, but requires a few small patches to glibc and gcc. At the
time I tried it, I based my changes on stuff from Cross-LFS, though
basically, they amounted to searc
On 11/29/2013 07:23 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 11:35:19AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Baho Utot wrote:
>>> Is it possible to build LFS-7.4 on x86_64 without the /lib64 symlink?
>>>
>>> I have tried to do so but libstd++ in the chapter 5 tool chain dies.
>>>
>>> I would like t
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 11:35:19AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Baho Utot wrote:
> > Is it possible to build LFS-7.4 on x86_64 without the /lib64 symlink?
> >
> > I have tried to do so but libstd++ in the chapter 5 tool chain dies.
> >
> > I would like to build for x86_64 and have the same filesyste
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 10:56 AM, frozen tuesday
wrote:
> Hello all --
>
> Thanks to the help I have received here or elsewhere, I have made it as
> far as section III in the online instructions: "Building the LFS System".
>
> I am using Linux Mint 15 as my host computer which only allows me to
>
Hello,
On Ubuntu and Mint, I found out that if you run:
sudo passwd root
And set the password, you can run "su - root" and login as root. I do this
as one of the first things when setting up a Ubuntu or Mint system because
I cannot stand sudo.
Hope this helps!
Douglas Reno
--
http://linuxfrom
On 11/29/2013 01:56 PM, frozen tuesday wrote:
> Hello all --
>
> Thanks to the help I have received here or elsewhere, I have made it as
> far as section III in the online instructions: "Building the LFS System".
>
> I am using Linux Mint 15 as my host computer which only allows me to
> "sudo" befo
Hello all --
Thanks to the help I have received here or elsewhere, I have made it as far
as section III in the online instructions: "Building the LFS System".
I am using Linux Mint 15 as my host computer which only allows me to "sudo"
before commands. I cannot log in as root (to my knowledge). Th
Baho Utot wrote:
> Is it possible to build LFS-7.4 on x86_64 without the /lib64 symlink?
>
> I have tried to do so but libstd++ in the chapter 5 tool chain dies.
>
> I would like to build for x86_64 and have the same filesystem layout
> that i686 has ie without the lib64 directories
I really don't
Is it possible to build LFS-7.4 on x86_64 without the /lib64 symlink?
I have tried to do so but libstd++ in the chapter 5 tool chain dies.
I would like to build for x86_64 and have the same filesystem layout
that i686 has ie without the lib64 directories
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman
Le 26/11/2013 20:32, frozen tuesday a écrit :
> OK, my fault. I neglected to notice that 3 packages had not been installed:
>
> bison
> yacc
> m4
>
> I have installed them and my version check script shows everything is
> installed. I am ready to try again. Can I simply issue the "make" command
>
frozen tuesday wrote:
> OK, my fault. I neglected to notice that 3 packages had not been installed:
>
> bison
> yacc
> m4
>
> I have installed them and my version check script shows everything is
> installed. I am ready to try again. Can I simply issue the "make" command
> again or do I need to do
OK, my fault. I neglected to notice that 3 packages had not been installed:
bison
yacc
m4
I have installed them and my version check script shows everything is
installed. I am ready to try again. Can I simply issue the "make" command
again or do I need to do something special to undo stuff that w
On 26.11.2013 01:16, Carl Thorn wrote:
On 11/25/2013 03:38 PM, Kenan Regez wrote:
On 25.11.2013 06:14, Chris Staub wrote:
On 11/24/2013 04:01 PM, Kenan Regez wrote:
Hi,
It is my first try to build LFS im really excited about the project but
i have got a question about the step GCC 4.8.1.
I r
frozen tuesday wrote:
> Hello all --
>
> I am using Linux Mint 15 Cinnamon as my host system for creating my LFS
> system.
>
> When I get to chapter 5.7, I get the following error(s) when I issues the
> "make" command for the glibc package:
>
> ../sysdeps/x86_64/fpu/s_signbit.S: Assembler messages:
Hello all --
I am using Linux Mint 15 Cinnamon as my host system for creating my LFS
system.
When I get to chapter 5.7, I get the following error(s) when I issues the
"make" command for the glibc package:
../sysdeps/x86_64/fpu/s_signbit.S: Assembler messages:
../sysdeps/x86_64/fpu/s_signbit.S:25
On 11/25/2013 03:38 PM, Kenan Regez wrote:
On 25.11.2013 06:14, Chris Staub wrote:
On 11/24/2013 04:01 PM, Kenan Regez wrote:
Hi,
It is my first try to build LFS im really excited about the project but
i have got a question about the step GCC 4.8.1.
I run into the same error many times when i
On 25.11.2013 06:14, Chris Staub wrote:
On 11/24/2013 04:01 PM, Kenan Regez wrote:
Hi,
It is my first try to build LFS im really excited about the project but
i have got a question about the step GCC 4.8.1.
I run into the same error many times when i run "make". I followed every
step in the bo
On 11/24/2013 04:01 PM, Kenan Regez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It is my first try to build LFS im really excited about the project but
> i have got a question about the step GCC 4.8.1.
>
> I run into the same error many times when i run "make". I followed every
> step in the book, i untared the gmp, mpfr and
Hi,
It is my first try to build LFS im really excited about the project but
i have got a question about the step GCC 4.8.1.
I run into the same error many times when i run "make". I followed every
step in the book, i untared the gmp, mpfr and mpc into my gcc-4.8.1 dir,
as written in the book
On 21/09/2013 12:48 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Geoff Swan wrote:
>> I recently proceeded with the LFS-7.4 build, using a FC16 bootstrap
>> host, which built nicely all the way to the grub-install part in chapter
>> 8.4.
>>
>> The FC16 bootstrap OS is on sda and the new LFS build is on sdb, so
>> eve
Op Fri, 20 Sep 2013 16:48:17 +0200 schreef Bruce Dubbs :
> Geoff Swan wrote:
>> I recently proceeded with the LFS-7.4 build, using a FC16 bootstrap
>> host, which built nicely all the way to the grub-install part in chapter
>> 8.4.
>>
>> The FC16 bootstrap OS is on sda and the new LFS build is on
Geoff Swan wrote:
> I recently proceeded with the LFS-7.4 build, using a FC16 bootstrap
> host, which built nicely all the way to the grub-install part in chapter
> 8.4.
>
> The FC16 bootstrap OS is on sda and the new LFS build is on sdb, so
> eventually sda can be removed and replaced with the LFS
I recently proceeded with the LFS-7.4 build, using a FC16 bootstrap
host, which built nicely all the way to the grub-install part in chapter
8.4.
The FC16 bootstrap OS is on sda and the new LFS build is on sdb, so
eventually sda can be removed and replaced with the LFS drive.
I have mounted the v
On Sep 8, 2013, at 1:20 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
The Linux From Scratch community announces the release of LFS Stable
I've updated the Updated LFS 6.3 livecd.
It meets or exceeds the host system requirements (outside of gawk as
an update to gawk isn't needed), and have updated Make, wget, su
The Linux From Scratch community announces the release of LFS Stable
Version 7.4. It is a major release with toolchain updates to
binutils-2.23.2, glibc-2.18, and gcc-4.8.1. In total, 32 packages (of
62) were updated from LFS-7.3 and changes to bootscripts and text have
been made throughout the
The Linux From Scratch community announces the release of LFS Version
7.4-rc2. This is the second release candidate on the road to LFS-7.4.
The changes from 7.4-rc1 include a one-line revision to glibc to revert
an upstream change that causes problems on some architectures. The linux
kernel has
Baho Utot wrote:
> I am pulling the SVN book version from svn repos and building html and
> pdf versions. It also builds the bootscripts.
>
> When LFS-7.4 is released will this go from SVN- to 7.4?
>
> Or will the final book/bootscripts versions just be placed online?
I'll copy svn to /tags/7.4 a
I am pulling the SVN book version from svn repos and building html and
pdf versions. It also builds the bootscripts.
When LFS-7.4 is released will this go from SVN- to 7.4?
Or will the final book/bootscripts versions just be placed online?
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-
The Linux From Scratch community is pleased to announce the release of
LFS Version 7.4-rc1. This is the first release candidate on the road to
LFS-7.4. It is a major release with toolchain updates to binutils,
glibc, and gcc. In total, 32 packages were updated from LFS-7.3 and
changes to bootsc
73 matches
Mail list logo
