hi Ron
me to delete a directory i do :
$ rm -r name-of-dir/
without "/" at the end it don't work correctly
you don't misunderstand what is a source directory
for the problem of mkdir now ???
try to quit the terminal retry with a new one
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
AFAIK CLFS shall be used if the host system is 32 bit and target system is 64
bit, because that is not a native build.
you forget patchs, seds, ...
if you'r able to build lfs for 64bits just with your knowledge
you should be able to build a linux from the scratch
without any book
i think
--
http
hi
LFS cannot be used to build a 64-bit system. You must use CLFS.
I didn't know it. Where in the book is it pointed out?
it should be mentionned on the project page
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscra
hi Arnie
isn't it a protected dvd ?
also sorry but can you try mplayer ?
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
hi PV
i suggest you to devel a systeme management tool
that can handle differents versions
so you'll have no problems in futur
thanks
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Luca a écrit :
Hi there!
Just finished LFS SVN-20060906 with some modifications (Glibc-2.4
plus Glibc-LibIDN-2.4 built as per book and Linux-2.6.17.11 plus
Linux-Headers-2.6.17.11-08232006 from Cross-LFS SVN-20060906-x86) and
had no problems in compilation. Now I tried various times to
Andrei A. Voropaev a écrit :
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 04:46:19PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> And here I go again...
>>
>> Just thought about grub. Is all boot-loader part static? Is all of it in
>> the
>> MBR or does it need something from the host system it was installed from?
>> Can I
kriss a écrit :
leonhard
your root point to the partition #3 of the second disk
what is the number of the lfs partition ?
/dev/sdb3 ???
i miss myself
forget my stupid question please
another : why chainloader +1 ?
chainloader is for boot via an other bootloader no ?
--
http
leonhard
your root point to the partition #3 of the second disk
what is the number of the lfs partition ?
/dev/sdb3 ???
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Matthias B. a écrit :
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 22:00:39 +0200 kriss
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
cause i can't let the only thing i love in win
Maybe it'll run in Wine. Have you tried?
MSB
MSB
i know it run on winehq but i don't want to use it
i have amd 64 so
Ken Moffat a écrit :
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 03:06:55PM +0300, Angel Tsankov wrote:
A couple of seconds after `umount /$LFS` failed I issued the same
command again and it succeeded.
Seriously, could any of the previous umount commands not have completed
even though it has f
Angel Tsankov a écrit :
Angel Tsankov a écrit :
Angel Tsankov a écrit :
Angel Tsankov wrote:
>>> Why can't I unmount /$LFS?
And one more thing to mention:
A couple of seconds after `umount /$LFS` failed I issued the same
command again and it succeeded.
you said you can't and after you s
Angel Tsankov a écrit :
Angel Tsankov a écrit :
Angel Tsankov wrote:
>>> Why can't I unmount /$LFS?
And one more thing to mention:
A couple of seconds after `umount /$LFS` failed I issued the same
command again and it succeeded.
you said you can't and after you say you can !
Can you te
Angel Tsankov a écrit :
Angel Tsankov wrote:
>>> Why can't I unmount /$LFS?
And one more thing to mention:
A couple of seconds after `umount /$LFS` failed I issued the same
command again and it succeeded.
you said you can't and after you say you can !
joker
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org
Shane D. Johnson a écrit :
Couple of possibilities
You are in one of the directories or subdirectories (use pwd to find
out what directory you are in)
you have a window from the host open in one of the directories.
If you are in the su enviroment for building that would cause it to be
lock
Ambarish Mitra a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> I am on LFS 6.1.1 and have just started on LFS.
>
> My question is on chapter 2.3 - Creating a File System on the partition. It
> is mentioned in the documentation to
> run the command:
>
> debugfs -R feature /dev/[xxx]
>
>
>
> If the output contains fea
Chris Staub a écrit :
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>
>>> certainly can change instructions and versions, assuming that you
>>> actually know what you're doing. However, if you do something like
>>> change the location of /tools, then you clearly *do not* know what you
>>> are doing. It's that simpl
kriss a écrit :
> hi
> make bootstrap return :
> /tools/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/../lib/libc.so when
> searching for -lc
> /tools/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/../lib/libc.a when
> searching for -lc
> /tools/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libc.
hi
make bootstrap return :
/tools/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/../lib/libc.so when
searching for -lc
/tools/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/../lib/libc.a when
searching for -lc
/tools/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libc.so when searching for -lc
/tools/bin/ld: skipping inco
f.l. a écrit :
> On 7/3/06, kriss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> can you tell how you make gcc-4.1.1 pass1 ?
>> cause in it the doc say that bootstrap don't work anymore
>> --
>
> like this,
>
> ../gcc-4.1.1/configure --prefix=/tools \
>--l
can you tell how you make gcc-4.1.1 pass1 ?
cause in it the doc say that bootstrap don't work anymore
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
21 matches
Mail list logo
