bsquared wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can anyone recommend some resources for troubleshooting a kernel panic.
>
> I have been built LFS 6.8 on a USB stick, and moved it to a disk
> partition using 'dd'. I modified the grub.cfg file and rebooted.
> Then got a kernel panic.
Hello,
Can anyone recommend some resources for troubleshooting a kernel panic.
I have been built LFS 6.8 on a USB stick, and moved it to a disk
partition using 'dd'. I modified the grub.cfg file and rebooted.
Then got a kernel panic.
--
Thank you,
-Brian
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman
In case anyone has interest. I was able to use jhbuild to install xorg
7.6 on LFS 6.8 w/ package users fairly easily.
I installed jhbuild as pkguser jhbuild. copied modulesets to ~.
I had issues running it as intended for two reasons:
1. I did not want to use /opt as a prefix.
2. using /usr as
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:22 AM, bsquared wrote:
>
> At what step are the rules installed? I could not locate 50*, 55*
> above in /etc. /etc/udev/rules.d has contains two files
> (70-persistent*.rules). Did I miss an instruction?
I see that I did. I some how missed the instu
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Andrew Benton wrote:
> It seems that /dev/rtc0 is matching this rule in 50-udev-default.rules
> which is why it's making the symlink:
>
> SUBSYSTEM=="rtc", DRIVERS=="rtc_cmos", SYMLINK+="rtc"
>
> The question is, why doesn't it match the 55-lfs.rules:
>
> SUBSYSTE
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 4:55 PM, bsquared wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>
>> Does /dev/rtc exist on your system? As Andy said, setclock is run by
>> udev. It's been that way in LFS since May, 2009 (revision 8902). We are
>> now at
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Does /dev/rtc exist on your system? As Andy said, setclock is run by
> udev. It's been that way in LFS since May, 2009 (revision 8902). We are
> now at revision 9518.
>
> -- Bruce
> --
Yes, I rebooted and checked /dev/rtc is a link to /de
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:18:05 -0700
> bsquared wrote:
>
>> egrep ^CONFIG_RTC config-2.6.37
>> CONFIG_RTC_LIB=y
>> CONFIG_RTC_CLASS=y
>> CONFIG_RTC_HCTOSYS=y
>> CONFIG_RTC_HCTOSYS_D
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Andrew Benton wrote:
>
> zgrep CONFIG_RTC /proc/config.gz
>
egrep ^CONFIG_RTC config-2.6.37
CONFIG_RTC_LIB=y
CONFIG_RTC_CLASS=y
CONFIG_RTC_HCTOSYS=y
CONFIG_RTC_HCTOSYS_DEVICE="rtc0"
CONFIG_RTC_INTF_SYSFS=y
CONFIG_RTC_INTF_PROC=y
CONFIG_RTC_INTF_DEV=y
CONFIG_RTC_IN
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:56 AM, wrote:
> Apr 28, 2011 01:14:02 PM, Brian wrote:
>> I may have the same problem,
>> ...
>> if I manually run 'setclock start' time is correct.
>
> You seem to go in the same direction as I;
> setclock has to be activated automatically.
> Check your /etc/rc.d/rcsys
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:00 AM, wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm confused about 'setclock' script activation in the boot sequence.
> Maybe I'm missing something:
> seems to have disappeared from '/etc/rc.d/rcsysinit.d/'
>
> Thanks,
> -- Alex
> --
> http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-suppo
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 9:53 AM, fuflono wrote:
> Good day.
> I had reached ch.6.63 of LFS-6.8, but now all week I am afraid go ahead
> without a copy the done work onto CDs. My CDs has capacity 700MB. May I
> to copy parts the lfs-directory onto separate CDs?
> ---fuf
>
> --
> http://linuxfromscr
Hello,
I have set my issue file to simply display:
^[[H^[[2J
Welcome to \n on \o
Current time: \d, \t
But I must have missed something because the domain is displayed
'(none)' and the time is UTC time, but hwclock --localtime --show
displays the correct local time. date command displays UTC as we
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 1:20 PM, bsquared wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Sorry if this is wrong list.
>
> The first package errors on install
>
> libxrender configure log:
> ...
> checking for RENDER... configure: error: Package requirements (x11
> renderproto >= 0.9) were
Hello,
Sorry if this is wrong list.
The first package errors on install
libxrender configure log:
...
checking for RENDER... configure: error: Package requirements (x11
renderproto >= 0.9) were not met:
renderproto install log:
make[1]: Entering directory `/sources/xorg-proto/renderproto-0.11.1
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 12:30 AM, DJ Lucas wrote:
> On 04/21/2011 02:58 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
>
>> Personally, I would be very reluctant to turn off acpi. Let's step
>> back and take another look - in ubuntu, the messages exist in the
>> log and everything seems to work fine, but in LFS they ju
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Mike McCarty
wrote:
> Is the version 6.8 wget-list not yet available?
>
> Mike
> --
> p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
> Oppose globalization and One World Governments like the UN.
> This message made from 100% recycled bits.
> You
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 4:03 AM, Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 19:02:00 -0700
> bsquared wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am not sure if these errors are related or not, but all three popup
>> in the terminal and are logged.
>>
>> Apr 20 09:46
Hello,
I am not sure if these errors are related or not, but all three popup
in the terminal and are logged.
Apr 20 09:46:29 lfs_usb kernel: [ 246.500071] ACPI Error:
[\_TZ_.THRM] Namespace lookup failure, AE_NOT_FOUND
(20101013/psargs-359)
Apr 20 09:46:29 lfs_usb kernel: [ 246.500148] ACPI Err
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> bsquared wrote:
>> Hello;
>> I got three different section mismatch warnings. I found patches for
>> two, but I am not finding any for this one.
>>
>> LD drivers/built-in.o
>> WARNING: driv
Hello;
I got three different section mismatch warnings. I found patches for
two, but I am not finding any for this one.
LD drivers/built-in.o
WARNING: drivers/built-in.o(.text+0x10539d): Section mismatch in
reference from the function parport_pc_probe_port() to the function
.init.text:plat
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 9:43 AM, bsquared wrote:
>
> It seems that there is a script in the kenel src tree that may do this
> (./scripts/kconfig/streamline_config.pl), I will report back when I
> have tried it.
>
I followed the steps indicated in the header comments of the scri
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 19:53:18 -0700
> bsquared wrote:
>
>> There is a dead? project out there (kcheck, kautoconfig, autokernconf)
>> all the same I think.
>>
> Yeah, I found this old thread http://lkml.org/lkml
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 16:58:26 -0400
> Neal Murphy wrote:
>
>> If the specific kernel option is enabled, one can 'zcat /proc/config.gz' to
>> obtain the config used to build the running kernel.
>
> Yes, but it's a chicken and egg situation. The
Thanks for replys. Currently re-reading kernel configuration chapters
of lkn
(http://www.linuxtopia.org/online_books/linux_kernel/kernel_configuration).
My host is Ubuntu, and it does not have config stored in kernel, but
i did find one in /boot.
Anyone try using configuration targets "allconfi
Hello,
Can anyone help determine what may be wrong with kernel config.
The last message is:
[ 15.448606] [] ? 386_start_kernel + 0x79/0x7b
It looks like several drivers have loaded as I noticed SDA, USB and
ATH5K related messages were displayed.
There are no error messages, but the Caps Lock a
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 7:09 AM, xinglp wrote:
> I created it by learning the Official LFS LiveCD, but my version has
> no desktop.
>
> jhalfs can run in it.
>
> With pkgs ssh, apache, svn, php, nginx, sqlite, mysql, gdb, valgrind
>
> Introduction
> http://smartutils.sf.net/livecd.html
>
> Do
> The .mono project was created by the owner of the Gnome project and some of
> their apps must use the .mono runtime in order to use the app, like the
> Banshee application requires the .mono to run and the .mono was at one time
> a project in work with Microsoft's .net so that some apps that is f
2011/3/30 Özgür KURU :
>
>
> 2011/3/30 fuflono
>>
>> Dood day.
>> Can I use, this were copied, "tools" to another drives, this same
>> machine, or even on different operating system (the same machine , the
>> OS is family of "Linux")?
>> --Fuf
>>
>
> Yes you can use tools directory (aka toolc
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Carl Thorn wrote:
>
>
>
> From: Kuangyu Jing
> To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
> Sent: Wed, March 30, 2011 7:10:27 AM
> Subject: Kernel config, how to find which kernel driver I need?
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to build kernel wit
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> bsquared wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I think there may be a problem with this chapter.
>>
>> $ sed -i '1289i\\tfilter.cloned = 2;' ip/iproute.c
>> The instruction ^ in the chapter, changes
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Kef wrote:
> Hi there !
> I am just compiling gcc 4.5.2 (chapter 6.16). Everything seems ok but
> at the end we have to type the following command to check if the
> linker is correclty configured :
>
> grep 'SEARCH.*/usr/lib' dummy.log |sed 's|; |\n|g'
>
> Here is
Hello,
I think there may be a problem with this chapter.
$ sed -i '1289i\\tfilter.cloned = 2;' ip/iproute.c
The instruction ^ in the chapter, changes the file.
the actual change to the file was:
tfilter.cloned = 2;
which caused this error:
iproute.c: In function 'iproute_list_flush_or_save':
ip
Hello,
This is not dpkg install-info anymore, but GNU install-info. See the
man page for ginstall-info for command line arguments.
I see this in the logs of many installs
--
Thank you,
-Brian
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/f
> There are also a host of things that we do in pass 2 of gcc, but my
> guess is that you missed something in the second pass of binutils.
You are correct sir.
--
Thank you,
-Brian
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Uns
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:38:03AM -0700, bsquared wrote:
>> > I tried to recreate the directory per ch. 5.10 instructions and it
>> > failed complaining about gmp.h also. However, I don't know if the
>> >
> I tried to recreate the directory per ch. 5.10 instructions and it
> failed complaining about gmp.h also. However, I don't know if the
> toolchain adjustment has any effect. I may have to wipe /tools and
> start over.
>
I was able to recreate the gcc-build directory, and the build still
failed
> grep -3 gmp config.log
> COLLECT_GCC=gcc
> COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/tools/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.2/lto-wrapper
> Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
> Configured with: /sources/gcc-4.5.2/configure --prefix=/tools
> --with-local-prefix=/tools --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-shared
> --enable-threads=po
Hello,
I got this error when building coreutils.
expr.c:54:18: fatal error: gmp.h: No such file or directory
As far as I can tell this file is not in the archive. The only
reference to it has been in 5.10. I don't recall this issue from book
6.7.
These are the exact commands I entered:
./conf
Hello,
I wanted to post this in case anyone else run across this issue.
I refactored my scripts and missed a hyphen on the su line.
'su - lfs' became 'su lfs'
This caused the "no more pttys" error which cause packages above
to fail their tests.
Hope this saves someone else the headache it caus
> WARNING: drivers/video/built-in.o(.devinit.text+0xb0): Section
> mismatch in reference from the function efifb_probe() to the (unknown
> reference) .init.data:(unknown)
> The function __devinit efifb_probe() references
> a (unknown reference) __initdata (unknown).
> If (unknown) is only used by e
Hello,
I am wondering if this is anything to be concerned about. I googled
some, and what I found did not seem to apply (using old config file),
or indicated it may be normal.
I have a pretty generic kernel configuration -- actually tried two
different. I get the following message when I make.
I recall that I had these errors in one of my failed attempts. I did
not find a cause, so I reformatted the target partition and started
chapter six over. I attributed it to user error since I eventually
got past it.
-Brian
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http:/
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:04 AM, bsquared wrote:
> You need to describe the problem, provide output from commands etc..
Oh, I see that you had previously.
Are you building on clean source?
make clean
-Brian
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: h
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Karthik Bhuvanagiri
wrote:
> md5 checksum of grub-1.98 tar ball is matching with the md5 checksum given
> in 3.2 section.
> What else could be the problem?
>
You need to describe the problem, provide output from commands etc..
As far as I know,
tar -xavf [sourc
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Drew Ames wrote:
>
> Congrats on making it through chapter 6!
Thanks.
> The permissions you have are the same as what I have except for
> /bin/passwd.
> I've got -rwsr-xr-x for passwd.
>
> I'm not sure that these commands need to be group writable -- although
> t
Drew,
I had another question about the tips you had posted for shadow. I
wonder if you could verify the permissions, it seems to me that they
should be group writable as well.
-rwsr-xr-x "/bin/su" root:shadow
-rwsr-xr-x "/usr/bin/chage" root:shadow
-rwsr-xr-x "/usr/bin/chfn" root:shadow
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 6:56 AM, Anand Arumugam wrote:
> Hello all,
> The machine in which I am trying to get LFS built was running the latest
> version of debian. But I changed the distro to Xubuntu 10.10 while retaining
> the /mnt/lfs partition. I was not able to login to /mnt/lfs since the lfs
48 matches
Mail list logo
