ave any build dependencies (only
run-time dependencies) it can be the first package to be installed in
chroot. I do that in my installation.
Of course if you have a package manager that has build-time
dependencies, the package manager should be installed later in the
process.
--
Tushar Teredesai
os) provide an
option to compile and install a minimal version of the package.
Most of the discussions on PM in LFS tend to end with using DESTDIR
for package installation which does not affect what packages and what
dependencies the user wants to install.
--
Tushar Teredesai
mailto:tus...@linu
ogram need to be
recompiled, and issue the commands to recompile them."
What you mention as critical is only for critical for a LFSer.
--
Tushar Teredesai
mailto:tus...@linuxfromscratch.org
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lf
n faults occur from that library and not from the binary
> itself.
>
That is correct. The way I understood your previous e-mail was different.
--
Tushar Teredesai
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/
one can also use linker
optimization (LDFLAGS=-0n).
--
Tushar Teredesai
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On 2/5/07, Jorge Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is if safe to just recompile shadow? (I mean, is there some post-install
> to do?)
Recompiling shadow should do it. There are no additional steps involved.
--
Tushar Teredesai
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linuxfro
e man page says a group name has 16 characters maximum.
> However, I had groups with longer names in gentoo.
> Any idea?
>
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/downloads/shadow/shadow-4.0.13-naming_convention_fixes-1.patch
--
Tushar Teredesai
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://
most
(all?) major distros. So it is easy to find workarounds when you get
stuck with a package that does not have straight forward commands for
fakeroot installation.
--
Tushar Teredesai
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mai
On 10/17/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bad misstake, the stripping of debug went ok but the strip with the
unneeded flag gave me;
Please re-read the second paragraph in
<http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/chapter05/stripping.html>.
--
Tush
.
In the former case should /boot be made an installation directory?
Yes.
What about grub that needs to have some of its files
(/usr/lib/grub/i386-pc/{stage{1,2},*stage1_5}) copied to
/boot/grub?
User grub.
--
Tushar Teredesai
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~
On 10/9/06, Rainer Peter Feller
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 12:38 -0500, Tushar Teredesai wrote:
> Hi:
>
> Please refer to Alexander's e-mail at
>
<http://archives.linuxfromscratch.org/mail-archives/hints/2006-August/003360.html>.
> I
ou have any objections.
Thanks.
--
Tushar Teredesai
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
y internets floating
around, it is hard to keep track ;-) BTW, looks like I am on the same
internet as you are:)
--
Tushar Teredesai
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscrat
iles from one installation on another unless you are
using exactly the same packages on both systems.
--
Tushar Teredesai
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.ht
On 2/1/06, Luca Dionisi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/1/06, Tushar Teredesai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > During installation of perl, I add the option
> > -Dotherlibdirs=/usr/lib/perl-addons to Configure. This allows me to
> > keep the perl package and pe
ou are installing to / then you may just provide pkg users write
permissions to /usr/lib/perl-addons/perllocal.pod and
/usr/lib/perl-addons.
--
Tushar Teredesai
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: ht
://www.gnu.org/software/binutils/manual/html_chapter/binutils_14.html>.
--
Tushar Teredesai
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
he devs do.
:-) So basically guys who know how to upgrade the toolchain packages
don't need to read the LFS book :)
--
Tushar Teredesai
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
ppreciate a link.
Most of the times I have seen it mentioned by folks who were burnt by
glibc upgrades on binary distros.
--
Tushar Teredesai
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.lin
On 10/18/05, Andrew Benton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tushar Teredesai wrote:
> > I remember reading on the glibc mailing list that glibc is always
> > backward compatible, i.e. an application compiled for glibc-2.2 should
> > work on a glibc-2.3 system.
> >
>
On 10/18/05, Tushar Teredesai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yep, lot of times. If I remember correctly, my glibc-2.2 -> glibc-2.3
> was like that, and so were many glibc-2.3 upgrades.
I take the first sentence back. I don't remember my glibc-2.2 ->
glibc-2.3 upgrade (
ion.
In the scenario you mentioned, though the vendor says glibc-2.3.4 it
is in reality glibc-2.3.4 + patches from glibc cvs + vendor specific
patches. So installing a prisitine glibc-2.3.4 is probably a downgrade
rather than an upgrade :)
--
Tushar Teredesai
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
On 10/18/05, Jeremy Byron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tushar Teredesai wrote:
> >
> > For your current problem, one thing you could do is to use the
> > following to install the new gcc:
> > make DESTDIR=/var/tmp/gcc install
> > This will install every
On 10/18/05, Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tushar Teredesai wrote:
>
> > As long as you are upgrading the toolchain packages (not downgrading)
> > everything should be ok, especially if they have the same major (and
> > minor version?)
>
> I th
y should not be removed until the executables
linked to that library are recompiled.
--
Tushar Teredesai
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscri
gcc &&
tar cf - . | (cd / ; tar xf - )
--
Tushar Teredesai
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
make other dependent pacakges link against the
installed versions.
Has anyone tried this?
--
Tushar Teredesai
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
ld scripts as and when I install the pacakges.
I see that there is some interst on the list in using MSB's package
user hint, this is my small contribution to the excellent package
management concept that he created. I hope folks find it useful.
Thanks.
Have fun,
Tushar.
--
Tushar Teredesa
u won't see any output on the
console.
Personally, I have two functions compilePkg and installPkg, each of
them independent of each other. If I need a var that needs to be
shared between the two, I set it globally.
--
Tushar Teredesai
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tush
On 9/1/05, Tarek Ghaleb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> BTW, what's the n after the sequence?
>
$ ls /usr/share/man/
man1 man3 man4 man5 man7 man8 mann
--
Tushar Teredesai
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/
--
http://linuxfro
I think conforming to standards is not a bad thing. I'll go
> ahead and toy around with relocating man pages, and report back in a
> couple of weeks.
>
Maybe this will work:
for i in `seq 1 9` n
do
install -d /usr/share/man/en/man$i
ln -sf en/man$i /usr/share/man/man$i
done
--
me to create a nice installation tree. The
pkg-user approach allows me to maintain a sepration between the
various packages (by not allowing files to be overwritten, e.g
hemidial or libiconv overwriting critical glibc headers).
--
Tushar Teredesai
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linuxf
ean that the lines were shifted.
Fuzz could potentially cause problems but I don't remember seeing a
patch that did.
BTW, if the guidelines for patch submission had been followed, there
would not have been a "better" patch ;-)
--
Tushar Teredesai
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http:/
en.
The reasons that patches are not rediffed is so that someone who has
downloaded the previous previous patch knows by looking at the Initial
Package Version field that the patch has not changed.
That said, I don't have any problems if we make it a policy to rediff
patches if they apply wi
ople know of
their existence.
Thanks.
--Tushar.
PS: CCing -support lists for wider audience. Please reply to the hints group.
--
Tushar Teredesai
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-suppo
On 7/29/05, David Rosal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tushar Teredesai wrote:
> > On 7/29/05, David Rosal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>Hi again.
> >>
> >>Continuing to reduce the size of my LFS, I've found a quite strange
>
u sure they are not hardlinks?
--
Tushar Teredesai
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
37 matches
Mail list logo
