On 8/9/05, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I created it, and applied it, for the BLFS instructions, and all BLFS > patches must also be in the LFS repo.
Probably would have been better to use the original patch in the BLFS instructions rather than just re-diffing to follow the patch submission guidelines. > I didn't want to have to field all the support questions for why the > patch applies with fuzz and stuff and just rediffed it so that these > types of issues (this thread mentions the fuzz could be a problem > for the OP) don't happen. The reasons that patches are not rediffed is so that someone who has downloaded the previous previous patch knows by looking at the Initial Package Version field that the patch has not changed. That said, I don't have any problems if we make it a policy to rediff patches if they apply with a fuzz. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
