Am Sonntag, 25. Mai 2008 17:03:18 schrieb Dan Nicholson:
> On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 7:34 AM, Mag. Leonhard Landrock
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So I believe to have
> >
> > 1.) 00:04.0 Ethernet controller: nVidia Corporation nForce2 Ethernet
> > Contr
Hello!
When starting my LFS I have the problem, that I have no eth0 or eth1.
Yes, I took a look at the FAQ. :-)
I have started my LFS from Debian Lenny. So I tried to get the necessary
information for the device drivers there.
Here is what lspci from Debian says:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lspci
0
Am Sonntag, 18. Mai 2008 07:22:35 schrieb morfast:
> Mag. Leonhard Landrock wrote:
> >
> > In "5.6. Glibc-2.7" make doesn' work as expected.
> >
> > If I understand it right something with "mawk -f scripts/gen-sorted.awk"
> > went wrong.
&
Hi all!
Some time ago I got a LFS up and running. :-)
Now I take another try with the latest version. My base system is Debian
Lenny.
In "5.6. Glibc-2.7" make doesn' work as expected.
As I have no idea so far where the problem is I post the whole output of make
after a second invocation.
[E
Hi!
In August 2006 I successfully completed my first and (so far) only one LFS.
Allready back at that time I made myself bash scripts to make life easier. Now
I started a new attempt with LFS for some special reason.
To obtain all packages I want to use an perl script and a bash script. The
id
Am Dienstag, 3. Oktober 2006 20:54 schrieb Simon Needham:
> I am getting stuck while adjusting the toolchain. When I try to move
> the files with:
>
> mv -v /tools/$(gcc -dumpmachine)/bin/{ld,ld-old}
>
> I get an error message:
>
> mv: cannot stat '/tools/bin/ld' : No such file or directory
>
> Th
Am Dienstag, 19. September 2006 05:34 schrieb Ellis Wilson:
> First of all, thanks to everyone for all the help. I realized yesterday
> that when I cfdisk'd, the partition was unfortunately fat16 (I think it
> is due to creating the partitioning in the ms2k and wrongly thinking
> mke2fs changed th
Hi Dan!
Am Donnerstag, 7. September 2006 18:27 schrieb Dan Nicholson:
> I've been looking into getting another box at home, but I really don't
> have the space to support another full desktop setup. So, I figured I
> could just get a KVM switch and save some space.
Good idea. :-)
> The question
Am Donnerstag, 7. September 2006 18:19 schrieb Luca:
> Hi there!
Hi Luca!
[...]
> Now I tried various times to boot but
> had no success, always ended up with a kernel panic.
> The error message is " VFS: Cannot open root device "sdb3" or
> unknown-block (0,0)
> Please append a c
Am Montag, 4. September 2006 06:56 schrieb Bruce Dubbs:
> Mag. Leonhard Landrock wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > When is the following expression true?
> >
> > if [ -z "$INPUTRC" -a ! -f "$HOME/.inputrc" ] ; then
> > INPUTRC=/etc/inputrc
Am Sonntag, 20. August 2006 11:07 schrieb Mag. Leonhard Landrock:
> Hi!
>
> I'm nearly finished with my fisrt LFS installation. :-) Nevertheless I
> still have some problems booting the new system. :-(
>
> My problem:
>
>
> When trying to boot my LFS ke
Am Sonntag, 20. August 2006 16:40 schrieb S. Anthony Sequeira:
> On Sun, 2006-08-20 at 16:36 +0200, Mag. Leonhard Landrock wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, 20. August 2006 14:37 schrieb S. Anthony Sequeira:
> > > USB drives are supported by the SCSI drivers. Make sure you have the
&
Am Sonntag, 20. August 2006 14:37 schrieb S. Anthony Sequeira:
> USB drives are supported by the SCSI drivers. Make sure you have the
> relevant SCSI options compiled into the kernel.
These options are?
> S. Anthony Sequeira
Leonhard.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
Am Sonntag, 20. August 2006 14:46 schrieb Ken Moffat:
> On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 02:40:08PM +0200, Mag. Leonhard Landrock wrote:
> > As I said: My boot device for LFS is an external USB hard disk. In fact,
> > it is a Western Digital WD2500BB in an external USB case.
>
> I&
Am Sonntag, 20. August 2006 14:27 schrieb kriss:
> kriss a écrit :
> > leonhard
> > your root point to the partition #3 of the second disk
> > what is the number of the lfs partition ?
> > /dev/sdb3 ???
>
> i miss myself
> forget my stupid question please
No problem. :-)
> another : why chainload
Am Sonntag, 20. August 2006 12:51 schrieb Brandon Peirce:
> Mag. Leonhard Landrock wrote:
> >When trying to boot my LFS kernel, it starts and finally gets stuck with
> >the
> >following error:
> >
> >VFS: Cannot open root device "sdb3" or unknown-block (
Am Sonntag, 20. August 2006 13:58 schrieb kriss:
> leonhard
> your root point to the partition #3 of the second disk
> what is the number of the lfs partition ?
> /dev/sdb3 ???
Exactly. My LFS partition is "/dev/sdb3".
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.li
Hi!
I'm nearly finished with my fisrt LFS installation. :-) Nevertheless I still
have some problems booting the new system. :-(
My problem:
When trying to boot my LFS kernel, it starts and finally gets stuck with the
following error:
VFS: Cannot open root device "sdb3" or unknown-blo
Am Freitag, 18. August 2006 21:06 schrieb Dan Nicholson:
> On 8/18/06, Mag. Leonhard Landrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Next, I have a look at de_AT and its friends.
> >
> > root:/# LC_ALLL=de_AT locale charmap
> > ANSI_X3.4-1968
>
> First, it'
Am Samstag, 19. August 2006 00:41 schrieb Brandon Peirce:
> Mag. Leonhard Landrock wrote:
> >Why does "find / -name syslogd -exec pwd ;" not work?
>
> You need to protect the last ; from the shell so it is passed
> as an argument to find, not seen as the end of the find
Hi again!
This time a more important question. ;-)
Invoking "locale -a" I get the following output:
root:/# locale -a
C
POSIX
de_AT
de_AT.iso88591
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
de_DE
de_DE.iso88591
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
en_HK
en_HK.iso88591
en_PH
en_PH.iso88591
en_US
en_US.is
Hi!
I was searching for the sysklogd script.
My first try:
root:/# find / -name syslogd -exec pwd ;
find: missing argument to `-exec'
My sucessful try:
root:/# find / -name syslogd
/usr/sbin/syslogd
Question:
--
Why does "find / -name syslogd -exec pwd ;" not work?
Kind regards
Am Dienstag, 15. August 2006 23:33 schrieb keith meyer:
> Hello all,
>
> My first time posting to any mailing list and I'm not sure if I need to
> post this here.
>
> I want to create an installation program so I can actually send my distro
> that I have made through LFS and have others install it
Am Dienstag, 15. August 2006 21:24 schrieb Dan Nicholson:
> On 8/15/06, Mag. Leonhard Landrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > BTW: Is there a suimple an well known way to remove the "wrong" perl
> > installation?
> >
> > For my first working (!) LFS
Am Montag, 14. August 2006 23:37 schrieb Dan Nicholson:
> On 8/14/06, Mag. Leonhard Landrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Can't locate File/Glob.pm in @INC (@INC
> > contains: /sources/autoconf-2.59/tests/../lib
> > /tools/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i686-linux /tools/lib/
Hi everyone!
Once again I'm stucked (a little). ;-( Below is the output from make (package
autoconf).
make[1]: Leaving directory `/sources/autoconf-2.59'
Making all in lib
make[1]: Entering directory `/sources/autoconf-2.59/lib'
Making all in Autom4te
make[2]: Entering directory `/sources/autoco
Am Montag, 14. August 2006 20:03 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Hi,
>
> I follow the instruction to mount a LFS 6.2 system inside a VMware.
> I use the LFS ISO to boot and everything is fine until the chapter 6.12.1.
>
> The compilation of gcc end by this error :
>
> [url=http://imageshack.us][img=ht
Hi all!
The link in the LFS book ("Results can be compared with those located at
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/build-logs/6.2/.";) does not show any
results for me.
I did "../gcc-4.0.3/contrib/test_summary | grep -A7 Summ" to take a closer
view at the test results. To me they seem quite
Am Montag, 7. August 2006 01:32 schrieb Brandon Peirce:
> On Sun, 6 Aug 2006, Mag. Leonhard Landrock wrote:
> >Am Sonntag, 6. August 2006 16:52 schrieb Mag. Leonhard Landrock:
> > > I did some simple investigation based on what Dan Nicholson told in his
> > > e-mail. It
Am Sonntag, 6. August 2006 16:52 schrieb Mag. Leonhard Landrock:
> I did some simple investigation based on what Dan Nicholson told in his
> e-mail. It definitely looks as if the binutils package tries to use the gcc
> compiler of "GCC-4.0.3 - Pass 1".
>
> -> I'll
Hi Dan!
Am Sonntag, 6. August 2006 16:24 schrieb Dan Nicholson:
> Why don't you try the above again with:
>
> $ gcc -v -Wl,--verbose SOMEFILE.c
>
> That should tell you a lot more information about what gcc and
> binutils are doing.
Thanks for your answer. I did "gcc -v -Wl,--verbose SOMEFILE.c"
Am Sonntag, 6. August 2006 13:48 schrieb Chris Staub:
> Mag. Leonhard Landrock wrote:
> > The first try (with LFS Version 6.2) went one step further. -> GCC-4.0.3
> > - Pass 1
> >
> > There (GCC-4.0.3 - Pass 1) an error ocoured and I started the build
> > p
Am Sonntag, 6. August 2006 13:11 schrieb Chris Staub:
> Mag. Leonhard Landrock wrote:
> > Am Samstag, 5. August 2006 16:09 schrieb Chris Staub:
> >> More information is needed. What do you mean "failed GCC build"? Is this
> >> binutils pass 1 or pass 2?
&
First of all thanks for the helpful answer!
Am Samstag, 5. August 2006 18:50 schrieb Vladimir A. Pavlov:
> On Saturday 05 August 2006 18:03, Mag. Leonhard Landrock wrote:
> > checking whether the C compiler (gcc ) works... no
> > configure: error: installation or configura
Am Samstag, 5. August 2006 16:18 schrieb Randy McMurchy:
> Mag. Leonhard Landrock wrote these words on 08/05/06 09:03 CST:
> > I am writing some scripts for my LFS build.
>
> I would abandon that effort until you know it works by simply
> following the book. People asking for su
Am Samstag, 5. August 2006 16:09 schrieb Chris Staub:
> Mag. Leonhard Landrock wrote:
> > Hi everyone!
> >
> > Note, that I just realized that error after I tried to build gcc.
> > Probably the (failed) gcc build broke something.
> >
> > BTW: My binutils
Hi everyone!
Now, that LFS-BOOK 6.2 is out I did a new try on LFS.
I am using Debian testing (etch) and here the problem starts. The system has
some tools in an version to new for the book.
I am writing some scripts for my LFS build. Here is the output of my first
script (NOTE: It tells for ea
Hi Raj!
Am Dienstag, 6. Juni 2006 06:30 schrieben Sie:
> Hi,
>
> I'm getting exactly the same glibc errors with
> SVN-20060531. Did you end up finishing the build? How did
> it work out?
Sorry, I didn't work it out. I've started a try with LFS 6.1.1 but did not
reach that position so far.
BTW:
Am Samstag, 20. Mai 2006 17:20 schrieb Dan Nicholson:
>
> OK. So, it seems that you are pseudo-scripting. Do you just copy and
> paste the commands from the text file to the shell?
Well, I copy and paste the commands from the LFS book in to the shell and
afterwards in my personal log file.
Aft
Hi!
Sorry for the delay of my response. :-(
Am Donnerstag, 18. Mai 2006 23:37 schrieb Dan Nicholson:
> On 5/18/06, Mag. Leonhard Landrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sorry to ask, but what are the important symlinks?
>
> These guys:
OK. Obviously not a smart question
Am Donnerstag, 18. Mai 2006 22:39 schrieb Dan Nicholson:
> On 5/18/06, Mag. Leonhard Landrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > root:/# strings /sources/gcc-build/gcc/cppdefault.o
> >
> > /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.0.3/include
> > /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linu
Hi Dan!
Am Donnerstag, 18. Mai 2006 01:05 schrieb Dan Nicholson:
> On 5/17/06, Mag. Leonhard Landrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is the result:
[snip]
> It looks like what I got. Unfortunately, that didn't explain
> anything. Just as a last ditch effort,
Hi Dan!
First of all: Thank you for so much care.
Am Dienstag, 16. Mai 2006 22:57 schrieb Dan Nicholson:
> On 5/16/06, Mag. Leonhard Landrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > echo | /sources/gcc-build/gcc/cc1 -v
> > ignoring nonexistent directory
> > "/usr/lib/gcc
Am Montag, 15. Mai 2006 23:52 schrieb Dan Nicholson:
> On 5/15/06, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > $ /sources/gcc-build/gcc/xgcc -v dummy.c | grep include
>
> I just figured out something simpler to see the header search path.
> xgcc is just a frontend for the actual driver, cc1. This
Hi Dan!
I noticed your second post, but just to make sure I try both tests (the one
from this mail and the one from the other mail).
Am Montag, 15. Mai 2006 23:30 schrieb Dan Nicholson:
> On 5/15/06, Mag. Leonhard Landrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi once again!
> >
Hi once again!
Am Sonntag, 14. Mai 2006 23:05 schrieb Mag. Leonhard Landrock:
> Am Sonntag, 14. Mai 2006 20:41 schrieb Dan Nicholson:
> > That's correct.
> >
> > Can you try this other sanity check that will actually tell us
> > something useful about ho
Am Sonntag, 14. Mai 2006 20:41 schrieb Dan Nicholson:
> That's correct.
>
> Can you try this other sanity check that will actually tell us
> something useful about how it's searching for the headers.
>
> cat > dummy.c << "EOF"
> #include
> main(){}
> EOF
>
> cc -H dummy.c
>
> That should show you
Am Freitag, 12. Mai 2006 23:03 schrieb Dan Nicholson:
> On 5/12/06, Mag. Leonhard Landrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > /sources/gcc-build/gcc/xgcc -B/sources/gcc-build/gcc/
> > -B/usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem
> > /usr/i686-pc
Hello again!
First, sorry for the late reply. I just had no time.
Am Freitag, 12. Mai 2006 21:47 schrieb Jim Gifford:
> Mag. Leonhard Landrock wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I am once again at this point where compilation of gcc fails. :-(
> >
> > In file included from
Hi!
I am once again at this point where compilation of gcc fails. :-(
What did I so far in this chapter?
cd /sources
cd ./gcc-4.0.3
sed -i 's/install_to_$(INSTALL_DEST) //' libiberty/Makefile.in
sed -i 's/^XCFLAGS =$/& -fomit-frame-pointer/' gcc/Makefile.in
sed -i '[EMAIL PRO
Hi everybody!
Once again I return to this list to check wheter I've got a serios problem.
This is still my second try to get LFS up and running and I am near to the
point where it failed the first time.
Here comes what I did so far in the chapter 6.9:
cd /sources/
cd glibc-2.3.6/
t
Hi everybody!
Two days ago I started a second try of building LFS. ;-)
At the chapter "5.16 Coreutils-5.94" I did the following:
1.) ./configure --prefix=/tools
2.) make
3.) make RUN_EXPENSIVE_TESTS=yes check
4.) make install
This is the first test of packages I run. And before I did the insta
Am Donnerstag, 20. April 2006 21:13 schrieb Dan Nicholson:
> On 4/20/06, Mag. Leonhard Landrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, so your PATH is correct. Now we need to figure out why you're
> using the host GCC. What is the output from these commands?
>
> $ type -p gcc
Am Donnerstag, 20. April 2006 21:17 schrieben Sie:
> > --
> > Dan
>
> Kind regards,
> Leonhard.
>
> PS: Yesterday I took another try. For whatever reason did the not get
> through. => I'll post it (with the result of the second try) once again.
Sorry, I just took a look at the web page and noticed
Hi Dan!
Am Donnerstag, 20. April 2006 00:16 schrieb Dan Nicholson:
> On 4/19/06, Mag. Leonhard Landrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gcc -v
> > Using built-in specs.
> > Target: i486-linux-gnu
> > Configured
> > with: ../src/configu
Hi once again!
Am Mittwoch, 19. April 2006 23:54 schrieb Mag. Leonhard Landrock:
> Hi!
>
> Well, I will take just another try.
>
> root:/sources/gcc-build# ../gcc-4.0.3/configure --prefix=/usr \
> --libexecdir=/usr/lib --enable-shared \
> --enable-threads=posix
Hi!
First of all: Thank you for the quick response!
Am Dienstag, 18. April 2006 21:40 schrieb Dan Nicholson:
> On 4/18/06, Mag. Leonhard Landrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So I did "gcc dummy.c --verbose" and received the following result:
> >
> > U
Hello all!
I downloaded LFS Version SVN-20060406 (some time ago) and startet building my
own linux system. Yesterday I once again found time to continue and
encountered the first problem:
As I have no idea where the interesting part starts, I just post quite a lot
of text:
FPBIT='' \
FPBIT_FU
58 matches
Mail list logo
