Hello,
What about packages with 'make install' scripts that do not respect
the DESTDIR variable?
Cheers.
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Frank Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello LFS users,
>
> The easy management of installed software packages is always
>
ground'. Afterwards you
can just pack the whole directory full of changes, and you got
yourself a package.
But there are other very good packaging techniques. Unix/GNU/Linux is
a blessing, because it is the multitude of these little smart tools,
that together make so much possible ;-)
On W
ough..
My question was about caveats and experiences from installing LFS from
inside a virtual machine.
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 10:03 PM, Scott Castaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have seen in the archives mention of installing VirtualBox on a system
> created by LFS. I am wonder
on Friday 20 June 2008 11:27:02 Ag. D. Hatzimanikas wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 20, at 09:53 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> On Thursday 19 June 2008 09:28:44 Wilco Beekhuizen wrote:
> >> > Is it not called eth1 instead of eth0?
> >> > Please post the output of:
>
On Friday 20 June 2008 09:53:23 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> it appears that ifconfig is not installed.
> An ls of /usr/bin/ifconfig yields "no such file or directory"
>
> does anyone knows which of the lfs package installs the ifconfig
> utility?
>
I subseque
it appears that ifconfig is not installed.
An ls of /usr/bin/ifconfig yields "no such file or directory"
does anyone knows which of the lfs package installs the ifconfig
utility?
Original Message----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 19/06/2008 15:06
To: "LFS Support
On Thursday 19 June 2008 09:28:44 Wilco Beekhuizen wrote:
> Is it not called eth1 instead of eth0?
> Please post the output of:
> $ dmesg | grep eth
> $ dmesg | grep real -i
$ dmesg | grep eth gives:-
Parsing all Control Methods:
Table [DSDT](id 0001) - 493 Objects with 48 Devices 143 Methods
welcomed
reply From: "Wilco Beekhuizen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "LFS Support List"
Reply to: LFS Support List
eth0 is given by the kernel. You are probably missing t
greetings,
I built an lfs system (kernel-2.6.23 based) few months ago. I only
now got round to try to use it. I noticed that on bootup I get the
message
Device "eth0" does not exist.
(I have /etc/sysconfig/network-devices/ifconfig.eth0/ipv4 configured.
I re-installed iproute2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying my first LFS-6.3. I use LiveCD as host
>
> In chapter 6.16 Coreutils... the command
>
> su-tools nobody ...
>
> give me the error
>
> bash : su-tools : command not found
>
> Could somebody help me
> Th
Hi,
I'm trying my first LFS-6.3. I use LiveCD as host
In chapter 6.16 Coreutils... the command
su-tools nobody ...
give me the error
bash : su-tools : command not found
Could somebody help me
Thank for advices
Renaud
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://ww
Hi everybody
During step 6.9.1 after make test I've got the following results (I add
the line's numbers)
1 make[2]: *** [/root/glibc-build/dlfcn/bug-atexit3.out] Error 1
2 make[1]: *** [dlfcn/tests] Error 2
3 make[2]: [/root/glibc-build/posix/annexc.out] Error 1 (ignored)
4 make[2]: *** [/root/g
Hello all,
I've made it up to Section 6.21, which builds procps. When I run make
I encounter the following:
root:/procps-3.2.7# make
D_GNU_SOURCE -I proc -I/usr/include/ncurses -MM -MG proc/alloc.c
proc/devname.c proc/escape.c proc/ksym.c proc/pwcache.c
proc/readproc.c proc/sig.c proc/slab.c pro
>Ursprungligt meddelande
>Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Datum: 2008/04/09 23:18
>Till:
>Ärende: Re: Automake 1.10 make check error section 6.27 LFS 6.3
>
>Dan Nicholson wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 12:13 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
Hello
I get this error running make check
1 of 566 tests failed
(38 tests were not run)
*** [check-TESTS] Error 1
Leaving directory /sources/autoconf-1.10/tests
*** [check-am] Error 2
Leaving directory /sources/autoconf-1.10/tests
*** [check-recursive] Error 1
i cant figure out how to solve
On Thursday 03 April 2008 13:59:20 Wilco Beekhuizen wrote:> I remember
/dev/pts is for secure shells or something like that. There> is a
kernel option for that. But do you use the correct bootscripts?> The
default udev configuration should work. Have you installed the> default
rules?it was a pr
Greetings,On Wednesday 02 April 2008 09:30:12 you wrote:> You probably
forgot to mount /dev/pts.> Add to /etc/fstab:>> devpts
/dev/pts devpts gid=4,mode=620 0 0>> /dev/shm seems to be
automatically created on my system. Maybe you> missed a kernel option?
thanks for your suggestio
Greetings,I seem to have a problem with udev with an LFS build I did in
January. I used kernel-2.6.23.12 (then development lfs).I get to boot
prompt but the booting reports:mount: mount point /dev/pts does not
existmount: mount point /dev/shm does not existhelp will be
appreciatedblux
>Ursprungligt meddelande
>Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Datum: 2008/03/28 20:46
>Till: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "LFS Support List"
>Ärende: Re: Re: problem perl section 6.23 LFS 6.3
>
>On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 12:11 P
>Ursprungligt meddelande
>Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Datum: 2008/03/27 21:37
>Till: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "LFS Support List"
>Ärende: Re: problem perl section 6.23 LFS 6.3
>
>On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 08:58:06PM +0100, [EM
Hello!
I have a problem i cannot solv on my own, therfor i am turning to you guys and
hope for a little help :-)
make test is ending with an lib/Net/hostent FAILED at test 4
when i do ./TEST /lib/Net/hostent.t it says Failed test `gethostbyaddr(`127.
0.0.1) in /lib/Net/hostent.t at line 42.
Im
I going on deleting and recreating on and on all used directories, may
be I do need some elses packeges?
On mar, 2008-03-04 at 20:22 +0100, Martin Faecknitz wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 07:06:13PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi!
> > recompiling kernel API I get m
Hi!
recompiling kernel API I get many errors like this:
make[2]: Circular /LFS/ROOT/sources/linux-2.6.22.5/include/scsi/scsi.h <-
/LFS/ROOT/sources/linux-2.6.22.5/include/scsi/scsi.h dependency dropped.
what should I do?
signature.asc
Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digit
hi,
thanks a lot for your help.
the specified file is already there:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/LFS/ROOT/sources$ ls -la /tools/include/asm/errno.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 lfs lfs 84 Mar 3 23:38 /tools/include/asm/errno.h
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/LFS/ROOT/sources$
On mar, 2008-03-04 at 08:54 +0100, Martin Faecknitz
5: error: for each function it appears in.)
make[2]: *** [/LFS/ROOT/sources/glibc-build/csu/check_fds.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/LFS/ROOT/sources/glibc-2.5.1/csu'
make[1]: *** [csu/subdir_lib] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/LFS/ROOT/sources/glibc-2.5.1'
make: *** [all] E
On 1 feb 2008 00:38 Ag. D. Hatzimanikas wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, at 06:27 Wilco Beekhuizen wrote:
> > 2008/1/31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Hello all!
> > >
> > > while i'm trying to make e2fsprogs-1.40.2 on step 6.15 of LFS i'
Hello all!
while i'm trying to make e2fsprogs-1.40.2 on step 6.15 of LFS i've got an
error:
make[2]: Entering directory «/sources/e2fsprogs-1.40.2/build/doc»
MAKEINFO libext2fs.info
make[2]: makeinfo: Command not found
make[2]: [libext2fs.info] Error 127 (ignored)
make[2]: Leaving direct
Chapter 4.3 - 4.4: Is there any particular crucial reason why the bash
startup scripts for lfs user have to be created and subsequently sourced
("source ~/.bash_profile" instruction) by user after having logged in? It is
not a big deal with the book, but is a problem if the host has persistent
stor
On Sunday 06 January 2008 19:54:00 Ken Moffat wrote:
> Re: amd64-build problems//now problem with TCL
> Date: Today 19:54:00
> From: Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, LFS Support List
> Reply to: LFS Support List
On Sunday 06 January 2008 13:45:55 Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 11:19:52AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > checking for gcc... gcc
> > checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out
> > checking whether the C compiler works... configure: err
On Saturday 05 January 2008 20:59:15 Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 09:11:23PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > lieee -lm -Wl,-rpath,/tools/lib
> > fixstrtod.o: In function `fixstrtod':
> > fixstrtod.c:(.text+0x0): multiple definition of `fixstrtod
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 06:20:06PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I am experiencing some difficulty with a build for an amd64. Both
> target and host are amd64-based. Theattached file shows the
> problem. I am using LFS svn book a week or so old. ( I h
Greetings,
I am experiencing some difficulty with a build for an amd64. Both
target and host are amd64-based. Theattached file shows the
problem. I am using LFS svn book a week or so old. ( I have built
a few LFS 32 bit setups before) Help would be appreciated.
blux
___
hi everybody!
i got stuck here, but i got no idea why the linker is missing,
the earlier two commands in 6.10 of the stable lfs-book all
worked:
> mv -v /tools/bin/{ld,ld-old}
> mv -v /tools/$(gcc -dumpmachine)/bin/{ld,ld-old}
but it seems as i do not have a ld-new to be moved to ld..
where cou
I'm a beginner of LFS and a beginner of Linux world, starting from LFS LiveCD
6.2.5 I have start to build my first Linux system.
Following the instruction on LFS Book I have sucessfully compiled the BinUtils
but when I try to build the GCC I get the following error message:
Bootstrapping the
warning sign saying "It takes at least a day for fastest systems to
build LFS, you dont gain anything by jumping straight to commands!"
-Armen.
On Dec 6, 2007 10:03 AM, Luuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 08:47 +0100, Andreas Hofer wrote:
> >
>
en one can script the process and/or save an image of the target
installation.
On Nov 27, 2007 11:21 PM, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 26, 2007 10:55 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > One of the things i find difficult to script
only have a theory or two..
On Nov 27, 2007 8:47 AM, Alan Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am building my own little automated LFS install script in Bash.
> > Basically its a copy-paste job from LFS book, of cour
Hi all,
I am building my own little automated LFS install script in Bash.
Basically its a copy-paste job from LFS book, of course, with minor
corrections for function.
One of the things i find difficult to script is a "nice" (read pretty)
way of continuing the install script after doing "su - lfs
re. I remember
wondering if that mightn't be a good failsafe for the book.
Paul Rogers ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
Rogers' Second Law: "Everything you do communicates."
(I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANSTAAFL :-)
--
I use jhalfs and the live CD to build my base LFS platform and nALFS to
build on that, but I find it less than ideal and quite cumbersome.
Because I have "invested" in a number of scripts to augment the default
blfs nALFS config I feel compelled to continue using it, but I really don't
like the XM
n, while you're at it, httpd also spawns children.
Paul Rogers ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
Rogers' Second Law: "Everything you do communicates."
(I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANSTAAFL :-)
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Send bl
, go for it! One of the problems any project's documentation has is it's
written by people who know too much about it. They leave out assumptions, and
overlook the "obvious". It all has to be read and questioned by newbies a few
times to fix it.
Paul Rogers ([EMAIL P
y to read the BLFS book for instructions! Catch 22.
HAHAHAHAHA
Paul Rogers ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
Rogers' Second Law: "Everything you do communicates."
(I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANSTAAFL :-)
--
http://linuxfr
nstall 2>&1
echo "Copying kernel image" ; cp -v arch/i386/boot/bzImage /boot/test
A=`cat .version`
echo "Copying system map" ; cp -v System.map /boot/System.map-$A
echo "Copying kernel config" ; cp -v .config /boot/config-$A
echo "OK, check logs. New ker
something like ttylinux or Tom's RooTBooT and create a stanza & initrd
that would boot into a tiny rescue system.
2. Any other system
3. A swap partition.
4. Your LFS partition
And you could swap 2 & 4 if you please.
Paul Rogers ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.xprt.net/~pgroge
>Messaggio originale
>Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Data: 3-ott-
2007 12.34 PM
>A:
>Ogg: Re: R: Re:
problem with my host system
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Acc! My Fedora
system is really crashed. The rescue CD don't find my
>> sistem. I'll
t
you?
Thanks
Massimo
Messaggio originale----
Da:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Data: 2-ott-2007 10.33 AM
A:
Ogg: Re: problem with my host system
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi, my name is Massimo, I'm going to install a
LFS system next my host
> system, a Fedora core 4 distribution.
> I
Hi, my name is Massimo, I'm going to install a LFS system next my host
system, a Fedora core 4 distribution.
I followed the instructions by
LFS-book and the 'lfs_next_to_existing_system.txt', creating a
directory in /home/LINUX_FROM_SCRATCH, mount --bind etc.
I compiled and
installed succesfull
oot:~# gcc -dumpspecs | \
> perl -p -e 's@/tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2@/lib/[EMAIL PROTECTED];' \
> -e '[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/usr/lib/ @g;' > \
> `dirname $(gcc --print-libgcc-file-name)`/specs
root:~# echo 'main(){}' > dummy.c
root:~# cc dumm
#x27;s in the LFS-6 /dev directory, but do you have /dev/agpgart? Try
"mknod c 10 175" if not.
Paul Rogers ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
Rogers' Second Law: "Everything you do communicates."
(I do not personally endorse any additions after this l
Hi,
Have a problem. after re-adjusting tool chain in section 6.10
sanity check gives following error:
root:/sources/glibc-build# echo 'main(){}' > dummy.c
root:/sources/glibc-build# cc dummy.c -Wl,--verbose &> dummy.log
root:/sources/glibc-build# readelf -l a.out | grep ': /lib'
readelf: Error: '
Hi,
Can anyone help with the following error obtained following make
install of glibc-2.3.6 Chapter 6 of LFS version 6.2
CC="gcc" /usr/bin/perl scripts/test-installation.pl /sources/glibc-
build/
gcc: _L/usr/lib: No such file or directory
Execution of gcc failed!
The script has found some proble
Yes, indeed, now I see where i read too fast.
Darn. Thanks a lot, Chris.
On 9/24/07, Chris Staub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have followed thru with LFS 6.3 thru chapter 5 and now at chapter 6.
> > I boot from LFS
Hi all,
I have followed thru with LFS 6.3 thru chapter 5 and now at chapter 6.
I boot from LFS Live CD, and have downloaded all package tarballs t
to the $LFS/sources directory.
What the book apparently doesnt specify at all, is whether one has to
re-unpack the tarballs (read: re-create sources)
e,
and adaptable, but not be a Procrustean Bed for sysadmins with their own
particular requirements. I think the reason many of us avoid RPM, apt, yum, et
al., is they try to take too much control.
What would be the characteristics of a PM that was in the LFS mold of doing
things?
Paul R
he keyboard.
>I can't ^c out of the service though.
Check everything pertaining to hostname & IP address, and who's supposed to
handle the log. It could be trying to contact a "logging host".
Paul Rogers ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
Rogers
ues in the new environment. No markers, no skipping around. KISS. I
suppose if I just HAD to have one script I could wrap them in a script that
setup the first environment, called the first half, on return changed the
environment and called the second.
Paul Rogers ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http:/
X-233 has an SBU
about 25min. I have my share of hours-long compiles! Xorg-6.8.2 is around
6hrs, Firefox 6.5hrs, kdelibs 8hrs, kdebase 9.5hrs. I just start them before I
go to bed, and let it work while I sleep.
Paul Rogers ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
Rogers' Se
o nothing that could require a new module to be loaded while
you: install the "new" modules into /lib/modules/x.y.z, tar those, then restore
the system's own modules. If the kernel of the system you build on has
everything it needs built in, and not itself using modules, then that
n questions it needs. Did
you check config.log? That has more details.
Paul Rogers ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
Rogers' Second Law: "Everything you do communicates."
(I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANSTAAFL :-)
--
http://
that time. You should have
all your BLFS, etc., tarballs downloaded, ready for compilation. At least have
your "essentials" ready, a favorite editor, security tools, favorite downloader
(snarf, ftp, et al).
Paul Rogers ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
Rogers
git without having to redo
everything. No complex spec files to work out like RPM. If you can't find it,
or want my version with some improvements, I can send it to you--it's one
script (a thousand line script more or less, but still one easy to handle
script).
Paul Rogers ([EMAIL
.1.110 panda.lan panda
# IPv6 version
::FF:192.168.1.110 panda.lan panda
Paul Rogers ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
Rogers' Second Law: "Everything you do communicates."
(I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANS
or some live-CD, Knoppix, et al, do your copy, take the IDE
drive away and go with the SCSI.
Paul Rogers ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
Rogers' Second Law: "Everything you do communicates."
(I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANST
line of its own. That and "0 errors
occured" after "make test" led me to assume the error
was prior.
Bottom line, still my mistake. Sorry for posting.
--- Original Message ---
>From :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 4/29/2007 10:58:23 AM
To
I'm receiving the following errors compiling Udev-096
with LFS 6.2:
cp: target `/dev/udev/rules.d/` is not a
directory: No such file or directory
install: target
`/usr/share/doc/udev-096/index.html` is not a directory
It appears the errors are a response to the following
commands:
Much better now. Thanks.
Paul Rogers ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
Rogers' Second Law: "Everything you do communicates."
(I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANSTAAFL :-)
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-su
>Bruce, if you check the mailman section in root's fcrontab you'll them
>commented out. I don't recall having installed a fcrontab file for the
blfs also, please.
Paul Rogers ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
Rogers' Second Law: "Everything
Rogers ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
Rogers' Second Law: "Everything you do communicates."
(I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANSTAAFL :-)
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.o
Sorry for replying only now:
On Fedora Core 6:
Let's take the dummy.c from the Adjusting the Toolchain phase:
echo 'main(){}' > dummy.c
cc dummy.c
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# readelf -l a.out
Elf file type is EXEC (Executable file)
Entry point 0x8048280
There are 7 program he
Hi,
I am building with the LiveCD and have made it to Chapter 5.11.1 GCC
build Phase 2.
I am at the point of running the commands for the fixinclude scripts.
I have entered it as provided in the book, but would like to check that
the command was actually successful.
I am worried as I do see the
Subj: Hello
Hello my name is Michael L. Richardson I just signed up on this list and am
introducing myself. I am the secretary of NYLXS (New York Linux Scene)
www.nylxs.com our server is down at the moment (it got fried while being
reconfigured) should be up shortly. I read the LFS book ab
From: Chris Staub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> ptys. I've checked the things in the FAQ, and most seem OK. I
>> depart from the book by installing /dev on the real FS, rather
>>than a tempfs.
>What exactly do you mean by that last sentence?
Exactly? This is my ve
From: Steven Vancoillie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Why can't you continue to use your host system?
I will be using my host system, I want to run Chap 6 now. But if I get
the drift of your question, the host system runs with a real /dev on
the root filesystem. It's a LFS-4.1
Hey, I wanted to thank you for signing up and helping me out. Don't forget,
you only need to complete one offer.
If you do not want to receive these notices, use this link:
http://www.mygiftresource.com/?PC=EMAIL
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
Hey, I wanted to thank you for signing up and helping me out. Don't forget,
you only need to complete one offer.
If you do not want to receive these notices, use this link:
http://www.mygiftresource.com/?PC=EMAIL
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
Hey, I wanted to thank you for signing up and helping me out. Don't forget,
you only need to complete one offer.
If you do not want to receive these notices, use this link:
http://www.mygiftresource.com/?PC=EMAIL
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
Hey, I wanted to thank you for signing up and helping me out. Don't forget,
you only need to complete one offer.
If you do not want to receive these notices, use this link:
http://www.mygiftresource.com/?PC=EMAIL
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
archaic, is much better than one that doesn't. And, no, I'm NOT
going to install KDE-3.5 and its bloated dependency chain.
Paul Rogers ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
Rogers' Second Law: "Everything you do communicates."
(I do not pers
>You can't. It is a kernel bug. As a workaround, don't use the "find"
>command in the proc filesystem.
>--
>Alexander E. Patrakov
Thanks Alex. I guess I'll make an alias then with -xdev.
Paul Rogers ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
R
rched.
How can I fix this? TIA
Paul Rogers ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
Rogers' Second Law: "Everything you do communicates."
(I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANSTAAFL :-)
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/l
>Not to be rude, but do you really need w98?
When Intuit makes a version of Turbo Tax that runs on Linux/X, then maybe not.
Unfortunately there is a real world out there.
Paul Rogers ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
Rogers' Second Law: "Everything you do comm
>When I got back and tried it out , the boot just skips over it and goes
>to my regular hd grub loader.
Did you change the boot order in the BIOS?
>So anyhow, did I burn the cd correctly?
Hard to say. Can you boot it on other boxes? Can your son boot it?
Paul Rogers ([EMAIL
eally need :)
Greetz.
Dan Nicholson napisał(a):
On 3/6/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
mount: wrong fs type, blabla
Cannot mount a tmpfs onto /dev
The most obvious thing is, do you have TMPFS support in your kernel?
Here's what my .config looks like for 2
ackage default, coming along on the ride.
Paul Rogers ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
Rogers' Second Law: "Everything you do communicates."
(I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANSTAAFL :-)
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/
Hi
I have just finished the LFS Book, everything seemed to be ok, but the
system failed to boot. Here's what I got:
mount: wrong fs type, blabla
Cannot mount a tmpfs onto /dev
I pressed Enter and the system halted.
I don't have a clue where a mistake can be, because everything were
going fi
not checking for USB bus support before it tries to do
anything is really sloppy coding. It does here now--I borrowed the same kind
of test pci.rc uses.
Paul Rogers ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
Rogers' Second Law: "Everything you do communicates."
(I do n
her running programs might think it's OK to write here or there and could
corrupt the disk. fsck needs control, so it demands an unmounted, or at least
R/O, file system.
What did you use to create your partition and initialize the file system?
Paul Rogers ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.
5735263
E_mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
网址：http://www.9500.net 致礼！ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
ssues)
>That's a really good suggestion. 80MB is definitely not enough to
>build large programs like gcc.
So how much real/swap does a LFS 2.6 kernel need? I wonder if that could be
causing my usb.rc segfaults. I've got 64MB/256MB. Hey, it runs LFS-4.1 just
fine!
Paul Rogers
>> Intel 233MMX
>> 80Mb RAM
>> 2.6Gb HDD
>> Debian Sarge (Kernel: 2.6.8-2)
>That's not a lot, but I know people have built LFS with less.
Of course. What else would we use? Bloatware? ;-)
Any ideas what would cause segfaults in usb.rc?
Paul Rogers ([EMAIL
s
difficult to answer. The only answer I could suggest is the equally vague, "as
a point of departure", because when readers begin BLFS the systems begin to
scatter like rabbits.
Paul Rogers ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
Rogers' Second Law: "Ev
ith --prefix= and --prefix=/ and it came
>out the same.
It's repeatable for me too. "", and a few other options I tried, goes into
/usr/local. --prefix=/ was the only one that got it into /sbin.
>What version of module-init-tools are you using? IIRC, this was an
>issue in 3
networking but no sound or
USB, for this P-1 system but that seemed to get the same segfaults as
2.6.11.12. What's going wrong?
p.s. erratum for module-inits build: --prefix=/ not ""
Paul Rogers ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
Rogers' Second Law: "
eCD 6.2-Pre2 and it actually does use Perl-5.8.7
>along with a patch to remove the preset glibc search path... sooo...
>any other ideas? Anyone? Please...
OK, your problem is a little different. Still, mtrace apparently depends on a
clean Perl install. Look there.
Paul Rogers ([EMAIL PROT
with the chroot environment to build out with BLFS until you get enough extras
to make it functional stand-alone. Your host is still useful.
Paul Rogers ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
Rogers' Second Law: "Everything you do communicates."
(I do not personally
I can't believe I reposted the whole digest. Apologies to all.
Paul Rogers ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
Rogers' Second Law: "Everything you do communicates."
(I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANSTAAFL :-)
--
http://linuxfro
aul Rogers ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
Rogers' Second Law: "Everything you do communicates."
(I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANSTAAFL :-)
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Send lfs-support mailing list submissions to
lfs-support@
hat
>would guarantee a short exec time for the script each time we run it
>(and we would run it often with a lfs ;-) ).
A "destdir=" could help. But seriously, I'm running with a P1-233 and I don't
find the time that onerous.
Paul Rogers ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
