Am 21.11.2012 14:38, schrieb Fernando de Oliveira:
> I thought in stripping it, but I am still not sure if any problem would
> appear. What is the command you used to strip?
i use DESTDIR on all packages, so i can loop thru all files in DESTDIR
to (re)compress all manpages, strip all binaries a
(replying from gmail in midori, to test that, sorry if the line
lengths are erratic :)
I mentioned 188 because that is what is in the 7.2 book, and therefore
udev-lfs-188-3.tar.bz2 is accessible (unlike patches, the lfs udev
tarballs can be
hard to locate).
Once you are using the current bootscri
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 01:23:30PM -0500, alex lupu wrote:
>
> > And if it does solve it, *please* be wary of updating udev to a
> > newer version in a completed system! Do it if you have to, but
> > expect problems :)
>
> Can you elaborate on that a little bit (*please* add more sweet music)?
>
--- Em qua, 21/11/12, Ken Moffat escreveu:
> De: Ken Moffat
> Assunto: Re: [lfs-support] How is 'dev/pts' created (or not)?
> Para: "LFS Support List"
> Data: Quarta-feira, 21 de Novembro de 2012, 10:40:55 MST 2012
> I now think that Bruce fixed the /dev/pts problem (ticket #3102) in
> r9868 by a
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 11:52:58AM -0500, alex lupu wrote:
>
> --
> A few asides (if I may).
> 1. I have a perfect backup of my now shaky system.
> It's a 3.6.1 with 182 and /dev/pts.
> I'll start messing it up and troubleshooting from there
> on my now restored test system.
>
I now think
--- Em qua, 21/11/12, Bruce Dubbs escreveu:
> De: Bruce Dubbs
> Assunto: Re: [lfs-support] How is 'dev/pts' created (or not)?
> Para: "LFS Support List"
> Data: Quarta-feira, 21 de Novembro de 2012, 12:45
[...]
> In 3.6.2, I have:
>
> #
> # Character devices
> #
> CONFIG_VT=y
> CONFIG_CONSOLE_T
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 09:31:48PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>
>> I'm pretty sure udev has nothing to do with mounting /dev/pts.
>>
> That was my initial thought too, but I've now remembered that I had
> the exact same problem in my own testing of some of the ways to cope
> w
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 09:31:48PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> I'm pretty sure udev has nothing to do with mounting /dev/pts.
>
That was my initial thought too, but I've now remembered that I had
the exact same problem in my own testing of some of the ways to cope
with systemd's takeover of ud
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:10:39PM -0500, alex lupu wrote:
> Hi Ken:
>
> Thank you very much, considering that it must be
> cold and late out there!
>
Late, yes (normal for me), but actually it was quite warm and
anyway I was waiting for one of my revised buildscripts to complete.
>
> Maybe I'
--- Em ter, 20/11/12, Tobias Gasser escreveu:
> De: Tobias Gasser
> Assunto: Re: [lfs-support] A startup quesion
> Para: "LFS Support List"
> Data: Terça-feira, 20 de Novembro de 2012, 21:31
> > Reading back, my sentence could
> be misleading, so, to be clear, I was
> > referring LO to build size,
--- Em ter, 20/11/12, Bruce Dubbs escreveu:
> De: Bruce Dubbs
> Assunto: Re: [lfs-support] A startup quesion
> Para: "LFS Support List"
> Data: Terça-feira, 20 de Novembro de 2012, 19:06
> Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> > --- Em ter, 20/11/12, Ken Moffat escreveu:
> >
> >> De: Ken Moffat
> >> Assun
--- Em qua, 21/11/12, alex lupu escreveu:
> De: alex lupu
> Assunto: [lfs-support] How is 'dev/pts' created (or not)?
> Para: lfs-support
> Data: Quarta-feira, 21 de Novembro de 2012, 2:05
> Hi Bruce:
>
> == Alex:
> 'dev/pts' has also disappeared (kernel 3.6.7 BUT udev
> 182!).
This machine is
12 matches
Mail list logo
