DJ Lucas wrote:
> On 04/13/2011 09:04 PM, Mike McCarty wrote:
>> There is an incompatibility with using udev and /usr being a
>> separate file system, which users of LFS need to be aware of.
>> It is presently not possible, in general, to use udev and have
>> /usr be a separately mounted file syste
On Monday 18 April 2011 17:49:16 Dave Hajoglou wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> > There is definitely something wrong. On a production LFS system running
> > in a virtual envronment, I get:
> >
> > real0m18.514s
> > user0m8.984s
> > sys 0m2.697s
>
> I'
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> There is definitely something wrong. On a production LFS system running
> in a virtual envronment, I get:
>
> real 0m18.514s
> user 0m8.984s
> sys 0m2.697s
I'm still having the same problems after recompiling the kernel a few
time
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> bsquared wrote:
>> Hello;
>> I got three different section mismatch warnings. I found patches for
>> two, but I am not finding any for this one.
>>
>> LD drivers/built-in.o
>> WARNING: drivers/built-in.o(.text+0x10539d): Section mismatc
On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 13:41 -0500, DJ Lucas wrote:
> On 04/17/2011 01:31 PM, DJ Lucas wrote:
>
> >
> > Anyway, udev starts 4th in the startup scripts, it runs across a uevent
> > that uses a rule found in /usr, and it fails to create the device node.
>
> Errit creates the device node, but fai
On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 12:33 +0100, Andrew Benton wrote:
> I think that the idea of doing away with /usr and just installing
> everything into / is interesting as it would simplify the structure of
> the directories. I also think that making the change would be like
> poking yourself in the eye with
