On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 08:39:13PM -0600, robert wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> > robert wrote:
> >
> >> Does this mean, then, that I am supposed to receive the message:
> >> FAIL: test/udev-test.pl
> >
> > Do you have the filesystems mounted in the chroot environment? (Section
> > 6.2.3)
> >
>
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> robert wrote:
>
>> Does this mean, then, that I am supposed to receive the message:
>> FAIL: test/udev-test.pl
>
> Do you have the filesystems mounted in the chroot environment? (Section
> 6.2.3)
>
>-- Bruce
yes, in chroot environment.
when I de-archive the bz2 files
robert wrote:
> Does this mean, then, that I am supposed to receive the message:
> FAIL: test/udev-test.pl
Do you have the filesystems mounted in the chroot environment? (Section
6.2.3)
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org
6.59.1 says, in part:
Create some devices and directories that Udev cannot handle due to them
being required very early in the boot process, or by Udev itself:
$install -dv /lib/{firmware,udev/devices/{pts,shm}}
$mknod -m0666 /lib/udev/devices/null c 1 3
Does this mean, then, that I am supposed
at 6.59. Udev-161
+
$tar jxf udev-161.tar.bz2
$cd udev-161
$tar -xvf ../udev-config-20100128.tar.bz2
$tar -xvf ../udev-161-testfiles.tar.bz2 --strip-components=1
$install -dv /lib/{firmware,udev/devices/{pts,shm}}
$mknod -m0666 /lib/udev/devices/null c 1 3
$./configure --prefix=/usr
Oooh I'm sorry , use :
gcc-4.4.3 as u will , i don't test if gcc-4.5.1 will be compatible with other
packages .So it's better to use gcc-4.4.3 .
Adjust command to be for gcc-4.4.3 instead of gcc-4.5.1 .
---Fady
> Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 16:04:46 -0500
> Subject: Re: error: fenv.h: No such fil
piper.guy1 wrote:
> The 6.6. book calls for gcc-4.4.3. Is it necessary to use gcc-4.5.1
> instead?
No. LFS-6.6 used gcc-4.4.3, but LFS-6.7 is the current stable version.
> If so, is gcc-4.5.1 compatible with the rest of the packages
> in 6.6?
Not checked.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscr
The 6.6. book calls for gcc-4.4.3. Is it necessary to use gcc-4.5.1
instead? If so, is gcc-4.5.1 compatible with the rest of the packages
in 6.6?
/carl h.
2010/12/6 Fady Fawzy :
> Hello,
>
> Ensure that your command using --disable-multilib & --disable-decimal-float
> options.
>
> So the whole co
Daryl Lee wrote:
> On 12/06/2010 11:34 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Daryl Lee wrote:
>>> I am off and running with my newly repartitioned drive and have
>>> something to report, but not sure where to send it, so here goes.
>>>
>>> I'm using version 6.7 of the LFS book, and one of the files in wget-lis
Daryl Lee wrote:
> On 12/06/2010 11:34 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Daryl Lee wrote:
>>> I am off and running with my newly repartitioned drive and have
>>> something to report, but not sure where to send it, so here goes.
>>>
>>> I'm using version 6.7 of the LFS book, and one of the files in wget-lis
On 12/06/2010 11:34 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Daryl Lee wrote:
>> I am off and running with my newly repartitioned drive and have
>> something to report, but not sure where to send it, so here goes.
>>
>> I'm using version 6.7 of the LFS book, and one of the files in wget-list
>> ( has a broken link
Daryl Lee wrote:
> I am off and running with my newly repartitioned drive and have
> something to report, but not sure where to send it, so here goes.
>
> I'm using version 6.7 of the LFS book, and one of the files in wget-list
> ( has a broken link.
>
> Broken:
>http://sethwklein.net/iana-
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Eliot Gable wrote:
>
> Just like mentioned here:
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lfs.support/31452
> I seem to be stuck in the same build loop in glibc-2.12.1 in Section 6.9 of
> LFS version 6.7. Things I have tried:
> rm /etc/localtime
> ln -s /usr/share/
I am off and running with my newly repartitioned drive and have
something to report, but not sure where to send it, so here goes.
I'm using version 6.7 of the LFS book, and one of the files in wget-list
( has a broken link.
Broken:
http://sethwklein.net/iana-etc-2.30.tar.bz2
The domain
On Mon, 6 Dec 2010 02:13:08 -0700
Dax Mickelson wrote:
> Well, I've made it this far! :-)
>
> I'm attempting to check that I've properly pointed to the new dynamic
> linker (in /tools) with the test shown on page 42. I'm failing the
> test.
>
> This is my first time going through the LFS book
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 4:13 AM, Dax Mickelson wrote:
> This is my first time going through the LFS book. Can someone
> interpret the output of the "specs" code and the "test dynamic
> linker" code and see what is wrong? (My guess is the too many
> "../../../" shown but if so I don't know how to
Hello,
Ensure that your command using --disable-multilib & --disable-decimal-float
options.
So the whole command must be in this form :
../gcc-4.5.1/configure \
--target=$LFS_TGT --prefix=/tools \
--disable-nls --disable-shared --disable-multilib \
--disable-decimal-float --disable-threads \
Well, I've made it this far! :-)
I'm attempting to check that I've properly pointed to the new dynamic
linker (in /tools) with the test shown on page 42. I'm failing the
test.
This is my first time going through the LFS book. Can someone
interpret the output of the "specs" code and the "test d
On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 11:45 -0500, Neal Murphy wrote:
> On Sunday 05 December 2010 10:55:13 Rosario Turco wrote:
> > ../glibc-2.12.1/configure - prefix = / tools \
> > - Host = $ LFS_TGT - build =$(../ glibc-2.12.1/scripts/config.guess) \
> > - Disable-profile - enable-add-ons \
> > - Enable-kernel
19 matches
Mail list logo
