$reeHari wrote:
> Hi , thanks 4 the replies . I used version 6.3 of the book coz the livecds
> of lfs contained only packages for version 6.3 of the book . since version
> 6.6 uses newer versions of packages and livecd with all the required
> packages are not available , i would have to download ea
Hi , thanks 4 the replies . I used version 6.3 of the book coz the livecds
of lfs contained only packages for version 6.3 of the book . since version
6.6 uses newer versions of packages and livecd with all the required
packages are not available , i would have to download each package
separately .
littlebat wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 10:41:38 -0500
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> That's a script, not a patch.
>>
>> For an example of a patch, see
>> http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/attachment/ticket/2371/program-list-update.patch
>
> Here is a patch, you can apply it if it is helpful.
>
> T
On Thursday 01 July 2010 20:57:33 Face wrote:
> Ken,
> Well, I am really sorry for all the trouble i caused. I start over b/c
> i could not fix the earlier Problem, really sorry.
Sometimes, deleting everything and starting anew is all you *can* do. After
you've built LFS 10-20 times, you'll recog
On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 10:41:38 -0500
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> That's a script, not a patch.
>
> For an example of a patch, see
> http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/attachment/ticket/2371/program-list-update.patch
Here is a patch, you can apply it if it is helpful.
Ticket #2702 (new enhancement)
Ken,
Well, I am really sorry for all the trouble i caused. I start over b/c
i could not fix the earlier Problem, really sorry.
section 5.8 went Ok (I think) here is the out
lfs:/mnt/lfs/sources$ echo 'main(){}' > dummy.c
lfs:/mnt/lfs/sources$ $LFS_TGT-gcc -B/tools/lib dummy.c
lfs:/mnt/lfs/sources
On 1 July 2010 23:12, Face wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> lfs:/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils-2.20.1$ CC="$LFS_TGT-gcc -B/tools/lib/" \
>> AR=$LFS_TGT-ar RANLIB=$LFS_TGT-ranlib \
>> ../binutils-2.20.1/configure --prefix=/tools \
>> --disable-nls --with-lib-path=/tools/lib
>
Simon Geard wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 13:25 -0500, Mike McCarty wrote:
>> Simon Geard wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 10:25 -0500, al...@verizon.net wrote:
>> You were ok up to here...
>
> A combination of trying to simplify, and trying to remember stuff I last
> played with in college, back
Hello All,
lfs:/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils-2.20.1$ CC="$LFS_TGT-gcc -B/tools/lib/" \
> AR=$LFS_TGT-ar RANLIB=$LFS_TGT-ranlib \
> ../binutils-2.20.1/configure --prefix=/tools \
> --disable-nls --with-lib-path=/tools/lib
checking build system type... x86_64-unknown-
$reeHari wrote:
> hi ,
> i've just started my lfs adventure , but unfortunately got a problem right
> from the start . i'm following lfs book version 6.3 . I'm on chapter 5.3.1 -
> installation of binutils . I first installed binutils and it was okey .
> after that when i try recompile ld with LIB_
On 01/07/10 20:12, $reeHari wrote:
> hi ,
> i've just started my lfs adventure , but unfortunately got a problem
> right from the start . i'm following lfs book version 6.3
Why are you using such an old version? The current book is 6.6. Most
people probably can't remember much about 6.3. Certainl
hi ,
i've just started my lfs adventure , but unfortunately got a problem right
from the start . i'm following lfs book version 6.3 . I'm on chapter 5.3.1 -
installation of binutils . I first installed binutils and it was okey .
after that when i try recompile ld with LIB_PATH=/tools/lib , i get er
littlebat wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 21:07:06 -0500
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>
>> It's just not important enough to fix. If someone creates a patch,
>> I'll apply it.
>
> Here is a patch, you can apply it if it is helpful.
That's a script, not a patch.
For an example of a patch, see
http://
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 21:07:06 -0500
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> It's just not important enough to fix. If someone creates a patch,
> I'll apply it.
Here is a patch, you can apply it if it is helpful. Change "the
package" into "every package" base on the last email.
#!/bin/bash
# usage: fixa.sh sourc
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 21:07:06 -0500
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> It's just not important enough to fix. If someone creates a patch,
> I'll apply it.
Here is a patch, you can apply it if it is helpful.
#!/bin/bash
# usage: fixa.sh source_top_directory_full_path
# e.g., ./fixa.sh ~/LFS-DEV/BOOK
# For f
On 1 July 2010 05:24, Face wrote:
> configure: error: could not find a working compiler, see config.log for
> details
> --
So, what does config.log say about this ?
Also, I'm mildly surprised that your compiler doesn't support '-m32
since you seem to be building on 32-bit (pentium2). What d
On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 20:46 -0500, al...@verizon.net wrote:
> Simon, Trent, Mike:
>
> Thank you very much for the rich, detailed, interesting
> theories and explanations about video drivers, booting,
> X, fonts, pixels, my boot-up component steps, etc.
> All this knowledge and experience is obviou
On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 13:25 -0500, Mike McCarty wrote:
> Simon Geard wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 10:25 -0500, al...@verizon.net wrote:
>
> You were ok up to here...
A combination of trying to simplify, and trying to remember stuff I last
played with in college, back when accelerated graphics
al...@verizon.net wrote:
[...]
> post, ALL I'm interested in - for the moment - is someone
> who HAS "nouveau" active on the machine and has a boot-up
> experience different than mine (or even identical -
> the point is to compare notes and for me to "steal" a few
> ideas :):
Thus endeth the thr
19 matches
Mail list logo
