On Feb 12, 2008 9:39 PM, Sharif Oerton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:01:06 Mark Olbert wrote:
> > Quick question: I have 3 SATA hard disks, a PATA DVD-R/W, and a PATA Zip
> > drive in my LFS6.3 system. All five devices show up as SCSI devices (e.g.,
> > sda, sdb, sdc, sdd, sr0
Sharif Oerton wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:47:13 Sharif Oerton wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm a bit further along this time, but
>>
>> make
>>
>> for Perl is failing, saying
>>
>> makefile:954: *** missing separator. Stop.
>>
>> I searched the mailing list archives, and most of the replies referenc
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:19:06 John Gnew wrote:
> I had the missing separator problem. It turned out to be my /dev/null
> file was not setup correctly.
>
> Issue the following to test it.
>
> test -c /dev/null && echo Ok
> Ok
> If you do not get "OK" back, then something is wrong with /dev/null
Oka
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:01:06 Mark Olbert wrote:
> Quick question: I have 3 SATA hard disks, a PATA DVD-R/W, and a PATA Zip
> drive in my LFS6.3 system. All five devices show up as SCSI devices (e.g.,
> sda, sdb, sdc, sdd, sr0).
>
> That's not a big deal -- although it took me a little while to figu
Quick question: I have 3 SATA hard disks, a PATA DVD-R/W, and a PATA Zip
drive in my LFS6.3 system. All five devices show up as SCSI devices (e.g.,
sda, sdb, sdc, sdd, sr0).
That's not a big deal -- although it took me a little while to figure out
how the DVD-R/W was named -- but it strikes me as
Thanks to everyone who made suggestions on what might be wrong with my LFS
6.3 system.
I'm now able to connect to the new LFS box over either telnet or ssh. The
solution involved paring away some complexity, which I'd probably
misconfigured (e.g., reverting to an unwrapped sshd), and then realizin
Sharif Oerton wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:47:13 Sharif Oerton wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm a bit further along this time, but
>>
>> make
>>
>> for Perl is failing, saying
>>
>> makefile:954: *** missing separator. Stop.
>>
>> I searched the mailing list archives, and most of the replies ref
Mark Olbert wrote on 12-02-08 16:54:
> Oops, forgot to include this:
>
> When attempting to connect to ssh on the new LFS system (from the old
> system):
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/mark# ssh -v -l mark wiggle_butt
> OpenSSH_4.1p1, OpenSSL 0.9.8c 05 Sep 2006
> debug1: Reading configuration data /
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:47:13 Sharif Oerton wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm a bit further along this time, but
>
> make
>
> for Perl is failing, saying
>
> makefile:954: *** missing separator. Stop.
>
> I searched the mailing list archives, and most of the replies reference a
> FAQ entry that now seems to
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Mark Olbert wrote:
> Can someone tell me how I can get xinetd, or telnetd, or
> something!!! to log some additional error messages to some log
> about connection attempts against telnetd? I've tried using
> server_args=telnetd -D options -debug in the xinetd.d config file
? For
example, if you have a firewall blocking telnet, the daemon will
never see the connection attempt and consequently not log anything.
--
Theodore (Ted) Heise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bloomington, IN, USA
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of vir
Hi Everyone,
Sorry to be a pain but I am obviously missing something here and
haven't got a clue as to what it is. I have a Samsung ML-1210 Laser
printer. I have installed many different distros that used CUPS and
without a hitch I have been able to tell CUPS to set up the printer and
every
you select? I have a similar issue with nvidia, I switch to
VESA and then its function.
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 2868 (20080212) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__ Information from ESET NOD32
tandalone. sshd requires too much overhead on startup to run from
within xinetd.
Steve
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 2868 (20080212) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__ Informat
f port
22.
Regards,
Jeremy Henty
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 2868 (20
On Tuesday 12 February 2008 13:52:16 Mark Olbert wrote:
> I've built an LFS 6.3 system, it boots fine (with one oddity; see below),
> but am running into several issues that are preventing me from deploying it
> (it's destined to be a firewall/router).
>
> 1) I compiled framebuffer support into the
> These messages occur at the end of the boot process (I'm now running
sshd
> outside of xinetd to see if I can figure out what's causing the connectivity
> failure I reported in an earlier email).
You don't want to run sshd from xinetd, you should always run it
standalone. sshd requires too
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 08:59:38AM -0800, Mark Olbert wrote:
> sshd[2417]: Server listening on :: port 22.
> sshd[2417]: error: Bind to port 22 on 0.0.0.0 failed: Address already in
Plausible guess: you are trying to start sshd in standalone mode,
whereas inetd thinks it is still respon
an figure out what's causing the connectivity
failure I reported in an earlier email).
- Mark
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 2868 (20080212) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
--
ht
Maybe one of these will help:
1. Back up .ssh from the old machine and try again. Maybe the old key
is still cached on the old machine.
2. Remove all .ssh directories
3. Is it possible to ssh to localhost, e.g. on the new machine ssh -v localhost?
4. You could try recompiling ssh without tcp wr
:
ifconfig eth0 down
/sbin/ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.101 broadcast 192.168.1.255 netmask
255.255.255.0
/sbin/route add -net default gw 192.168.1.100 netmask 0.0.0.0 window
16384 metric 1
Can't help you with the framebuffer issues.
Good luck!
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Ant
2008/2/12, Mark Olbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Oops, forgot to include this:
>
> When attempting to connect to ssh on the new LFS system (from the old
> system):
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/mark# ssh -v -l mark wiggle_butt
> OpenSSH_4.1p1, OpenSSL 0.9.8c 05 Sep 2006
> debug1: Reading configuration d
When trying to telnet:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/mark# telnet -d wiggle_butt
Trying 192.168.1.101...
telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused
- Mark
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 2868 (20080212) __
The message
ream
wait= no
user= root
server = /usr/sbin/tcpd
server_args = sshd
bind= 127.0.0.1
log_on_failure += USERID
}
- Mark
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus,
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:17:27 Chris Staub wrote:
> I believe that answer is no longer valid, because LFS now changes the
> test script to use the glibc in /lib. I'd want to see more of that
> output, like the previous 10 or 15 lines. If that output actually did
> come from the "test-installation.pl"
Hi all,
I'm a bit further along this time, but
make
for Perl is failing, saying
makefile:954: *** missing separator. Stop.
I searched the mailing list archives, and most of the replies reference a FAQ
entry that now seems to not exist. One reply suggested to check for the
existence of /de
26 matches
Mail list logo
