>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> On Fri, 2 Dec 2005, Andrew Benton wrote:
>>
>>> Slackware uses an obsolete 2.4 kernel. You'll need to compile a 2.6
>>> kernel
>>
>> Obsolete is a pretty strong word. Is it really obsolete?
Andy wrote:
>For the purpose of compiling LFS, a 2.4 kernel is obsolete.
N
Hello all,
please does anyone can help me how copy a livecd iso ppc image inside a
small pen-drive usb and start it at the boot? Is it possible to do
this?? I would like to start my stick with this environment??
Thanks at all
marco --
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
--
> --- Ian Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>> I agree the LiveCD really sucks
>> I disagree!!
"Edward Poe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would have to agree with you whole-heartedly. I
> recently performed my first install of LFS using the
> LiveCD. I really liked the idea that all of t
On 12/2/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Dec 2005, Andrew Benton wrote:
>
> Slackware uses an obsolete 2.4 kernel. You'll need to compile a 2.6 kernel
>
> Obsolete is a pretty strong word. Is it really obsolete?
Just for academic interest, I bought an 8 proc IBM eServe
--- Ian Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I agree the LiveCD really sucks
>
> I disagree!!
> I recently completed LFS for the first time, using
> the LiveCD, and everything worked perfectly. I would
> certainly advise anyone who is thinking of building
> LFS to use the LiveCD.
I
On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 22:04 +0100, Ian Armstrong wrote:
> >>
> >>> I agree the LiveCD really sucks
>
> I disagree!!
> I recently completed LFS for the first time, using the LiveCD, and
> everything worked perfectly. I would certainly advise anyone who is
> thinking of building LFS to use the Live
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Don't let him get to ya. He probably couldn't figure out how to use it
and was too lazy to read any of those docs we've put everywhere.
Heh, don't worry, he didn't get to me. Just sometimes want to slap
people around for complaining about something that does its job a
>>
>>> I agree the LiveCD really sucks
I disagree!!
I recently completed LFS for the first time, using the LiveCD, and everything
worked perfectly. I would certainly advise anyone who is thinking of building
LFS to use the LiveCD.
Ian
Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
Se
Justin Knierim wrote:
Dhaval Motghare wrote:
I agree the LiveCD really sucks
Then don't use it! Geez. And if you think it sucks, tell us why the
hell you think it sucks.
Don't let him get to ya. He probably couldn't figure out how to use it
and was too lazy to read any of those docs we
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:37:38 +0530
Dhaval Motghare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree the LiveCD really sucks
Another damn HTML Top-poster too. Are we being invaded by Windolts?
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Uns
Apologies, I had thought I disabled HTML; I guess I need to
increase my eyeglass prescription.
Im on Chapter 6.11 of LFS, where I am installing glibc-2.3.4 for
the basic system and when I ran make check I got the following
error. I checked out google and I found a site in german (which I
am no
I've been prepping an LFS 6.1.1 build using a Knoppix 3.7 Live CD as
the host and I'd like to note a couple of glitches.
The host disk was completely clean: no OS or partition table. I
booted Knoppix with "boot: knoppix26 2" to get a Linux 2.6.9 kernel
and a root command line.
Chapter 2.3:
"
hi, I want to be a bit more specific (or anal!), I wanted to make it
global. Upon reviewing the /etc/bashrc, it contains:
alias 'ls = ls --color=auto'
but it also contains:
source /etc/profile.d/tinker-term.sh
which in turn contains:
export TERM=xterm-color
If I type "export" it display
Richard Westfield wrote:
No, the LiveCD cannot be installed to the hard drive - that's the point of the
LiveCD.
That's not true. I've got the LiveCD installed on a partition, and have been using that for my builds. LFS 6.1 is the only distro I've found, in my very quick research, that met al
> No, the LiveCD cannot be installed to the hard drive - that's the point of
> the LiveCD.
That's not true. I've got the LiveCD installed on a partition, and have been
using that for my builds. LFS 6.1 is the only distro I've found, in my very
quick research, that met all of the host require
On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 15:15:38 -0600
Kevin Barnard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You could try a port knocker. http://www.portknocking.org/
>
> This is designed for exactly what you are trying to do.
>
> On 12/1/05, Matt Darcy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kevin,
PLEASE STOP sending top-posts in HTML
Dhaval Motghare wrote:
I agree the LiveCD really sucks
Then don't use it! Geez. And if you think it sucks, tell us why the
hell you think it sucks.
If you want documentation for the livecd, look at the livecd page:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/livecd/
On the front page is a link to th
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 17:51:09 -0500
"Andy Kalenderian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
in HTML. So he should be ignored. He hasn't read either the FAQ or
the Essential Pre-Reading Hint.
R.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
On 12/1/05, Kevin Barnard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/1/05, Andrew Benton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey, Kevin. Please don't top post and trim your reply to only what's relevant.
--
Dan
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/f
Kevin Barnard wrote:
I think you are right about GCC most of that I think is around GCJ
(loads of fun)
1) Please don't post in HTML
2) Please don't top-post
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/index.html#netiquette
--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http:/
You could try a port knocker. http://www.portknocking.org/This is designed for exactly what you are trying to do.On 12/1/05,
Matt Darcy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Gerard Beekmans wrote:> Hey guys,>> Just wondering who else has been getting these. I have a /24 IP space> that seems to be targeted l
Hello,
while compiling file i get this error:
/bin/sh ../libtool
--mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I..
-DMAGIC='"/usr/share/file/magic"' -g -O2 -c -o compress.lo `test -f
'compress.c' || echo './'`compress.c
rm -f .libs/compress.lo
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -
I think you are right about GCC most of that I think is around GCJ (loads of fun) I'll play around with the newer bintools and gcc and see if I get anywhere with this. Worst case is I run into another wall and have to start over with a more sane distro. In either case I'll let you know the resul
I used 6.1.1 that has the patch. (http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter05/binutils-pass1.html) This patched 2 files I think, I'm at work away from the machine so I can't check for sure until later.
The normal make works fine and ld does compile and install. It's the secondary
Thanks for the tip. Late at night I must of missed the FAQ and for that matter the entire support page. Reinstall to a different disro no problem. I have a debian copy sitting around. Guess this is what I get for being lazy and not wanting to reinstall the toy/learning machine. :-)
On 12/1/05,
2005/12/1, Syòndil Boscoverde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi all,I followed the procedure of creating a brand-newaccount named 'lfs', and I tried to unpack thebinutils source code (.tar.gz) using its privileges.Unfortunately, I've got the following error:
tar: gzip: Cannot exec: Too many levels of symboli
I’m on Chapter 6.11 of LFS, where I am installing glibc-2.3.4 forthe basic system and when I ran “make check” I got the following error. I checked out google and I found a site in german (which Iam not fluent in) that had this, so I translated it but still couldn’t understand it but there wer
I agree the LiveCD really sucks
On 11/29/05, John Benes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:> Can't find anywhere...and shouldn't be so damn hidden...Have you read the FAQ and/or the book?> (1) Installation command for the livecd to start the project from
The livecd is the host syste
On Fri, 2 Dec 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Obsolete is a pretty strong word. Is it really obsolete?
For the purpose of compiling LFS, a 2.4 kernel is obsolete.
I've built with 2.4. :)
Steven
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/prologue/hostreqs.html
I have to assume that
On Fri, 2 Dec 2005, Andrew Benton wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2 Dec 2005, Andrew Benton wrote:
Slackware uses an obsolete 2.4 kernel. You'll need to compile a 2.6
kernel
Obsolete is a pretty strong word. Is it really obsolete?
For the purpose of compiling LFS, a 2.4 kernel is
Hi all,
I'm compiling glibc-2.3.4 in chapter 5.
Everything has gone ok in 'configure' and 'make', but
doing 'make check' I've got this error:
Failed to kill test process: No child processes
make[2]: ***
[/LFS/sources/glibc-build/nptl/tst-eintr2.out] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/LFS/source
Hi Chris,
> No, don't use that hint - it gives bad advice. Just boot from the
> livecd, copy source files from /sources to $LFS/sources, and do
> everything else by the book.
OK. Noted with tks.
BR
SL
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratc
Stephen Liu wrote:
Hi Chris,
No, the LiveCD cannot be installed to the hard drive - that's the
point
of the LiveCD.
Tks for your advice. I found the document;
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hints/downloads/files/install-lfs-from-livecd.txt
By Joseph M. Dupré
DATE: 2005-08-13
SYNOPSIS: How
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2 Dec 2005, Andrew Benton wrote:
Slackware uses an obsolete 2.4 kernel. You'll need to compile a 2.6
kernel
Obsolete is a pretty strong word. Is it really obsolete?
For the purpose of compiling LFS, a 2.4 kernel is obsolete.
Andy
--
http://linuxfromscratch.
Hi Chris,
> No, the LiveCD cannot be installed to the hard drive - that's the
> point
> of the LiveCD.
Tks for your advice. I found the document;
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hints/downloads/files/install-lfs-from-livecd.txt
By Joseph M. Dupré
DATE: 2005-08-13
SYNOPSIS: How to build a LFS 6
Stephen Liu wrote:
Hi Hari,
Why don't you just use the LiveCD?
Oh, yes. I have LFS-LiveCD 6.1-3 here. I can't remember exactly
whether it is necessary to intall it on the HD. OR just run it on the
PC to install LFS on the empty HD, preformatted. I suppose I saw
this posting before, inst
On Fri, 2 Dec 2005, Andrew Benton wrote:
Slackware uses an obsolete 2.4 kernel. You'll need to compile a 2.6 kernel
Obsolete is a pretty strong word. Is it really obsolete?
Steven
--
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.htm
> try as a test setting the term type to TERM=linux
>
> see how that goes.
>
> Matt
Thanks for the replys (Jeremy and Matt), unfortunately I have been
dragged off to work so will try it later on :( Have a good afternoon.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://ww
On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 17:02 +0530, Nupur wrote:
> >
> > Try /sbin/ldconfig -v | grep xslt
> > --
> > S. Anthony Sequeira
>
> The output is as follows:
>
> libxslt.so.0 -> libexslt.so.0.8.12
> libxslt.so.1 ->libxslt.so.1.1.14
Try recompiling now.
--
S. Anthony Sequeira
++
>From the moment I pick
Karl wrote:
Hi, this is my first post as it is my first lfs build.
My install went very well and am now on the blfs stuff. I installed xorg
and minimal dependancies (libpng & fontconfig). ls colours work fine in
a tty but I can't seem to get a colour terminal in X, also I installed
the midnight c
On 12/2/05, Karl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can see scripts which add "xterm-color" to my exports
> (eg. /etc/profile.d/tinker-term.sh) but I can't seem to get them to work
> - if I do "export TERM=xterm-color" then open a new xterm, still no
> color.
> I can't see the relationships going on
>
> Try /sbin/ldconfig -v | grep xslt
> --
> S. Anthony Sequeira
The output is as follows:
libxslt.so.0 -> libexslt.so.0.8.12
libxslt.so.1 ->libxslt.so.1.1.14
Nupur
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: S
Hi, this is my first post as it is my first lfs build.
My install went very well and am now on the blfs stuff. I installed xorg
and minimal dependancies (libpng & fontconfig). ls colours work fine in
a tty but I can't seem to get a colour terminal in X, also I installed
the midnight commander (mc)
Stephen Liu wrote:
is there any opinon on this
newly released Slackware 10.2.
Slackware uses an obsolete 2.4 kernel. You'll need to compile a 2.6 kernel before you start. http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/prologue/hostreqs.html
Andy
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/list
Dan Nicholson wrote:
I don't think, blah, blah...
probably not the place to ask.
Why are you posting this to LFS-Dev?
Andy
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
45 matches
Mail list logo
