RE: Building LFS without gcc, make, etc.

2005-04-12 Thread Winter Andreas
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > Alexander > E. Patrakov > Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 4:17 AM > To: LFS Support List > Subject: RE: Building LFS without gcc, make, etc. > > > Winter Andreas wrote: > > > Yes, good book. I have f

RE: Building LFS without gcc, make, etc.

2005-04-12 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Winter Andreas wrote: > Yes, good book. I have followed the book and everything worked. But now I > want to end up whith a system without any development tools. Of course I > can try to manually remove gcc, etc after the build. Why manually? Install some package manager. I had success with checki

RE: terrible kernel mistake

2005-04-12 Thread Gavin Jackson
make: warning: Clock skew detected. Your build may be incomplete. make: warning: Clock skew detected. Your build may be incomplete. Gavin Jackson wrote: The make warning is caused by make finding that the object files are newer than the source files it is trying to build them from. You'll n

Re: udev problems in LFS 6.0

2005-04-12 Thread Matthew Burgess
Donal Farrell top-posted the following: CONFIG_DEVFS_FS=y CONFIG_DEVFS_MOUNT=y CONFIG_DEVFS_DEBUG=y You certainly don't want these. Read 7.4.1 again. I'm not sure these have anything to do with your problem, but they certainly won't be helping things. Regards, Matt. -- http://linuxfromscratch.

terrible kernel mistake

2005-04-12 Thread Donal Farrell
Hi to all. To cut crap, this is what I did.. I'd been trying to het through the early stages (pre-X) of BLFS by using chroot. I knew that the minor versions of the host and lfs kernels were different. I got as far as autofs and i had to recompile the kernel here for SBM and NFS filesystem support.

Re: udev problems in LFS 6.0

2005-04-12 Thread Donal Farrell
# # Pseudo filesystems # CONFIG_PROC_FS=y CONFIG_PROC_KCORE=y CONFIG_SYSFS=y CONFIG_DEVFS_FS=y CONFIG_DEVFS_MOUNT=y CONFIG_DEVFS_DEBUG=y CONFIG_DEVPTS_FS_XATTR=y CONFIG_DEVPTS_FS_SECURITY=y CONFIG_TMPFS=y CONFIG_HUGETLBFS=y CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE=y CONFIG_RAMFS=y Regards, Donal On Tue, 2005-04-12 a

Re: udev problems in LFS 6.0

2005-04-12 Thread Ken Moffat
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Donal Farrell wrote: > Hi there. I'm having problems with udev in LFS 6.0 It's not a > compilation problem as such. When I run > > /etc/rc.d/init.d/udev start in the actual completed LFS system, > absolutely nothing happens > > However, when I try the same prompt under chroot,

udev problems in LFS 6.0

2005-04-12 Thread Donal Farrell
Hi there. I'm having problems with udev in LFS 6.0 It's not a compilation problem as such. When I run /etc/rc.d/init.d/udev start in the actual completed LFS system, absolutely nothing happens However, when I try the same prompt under chroot, /dev gets populated and I see a valid-looking /dev A

RE: Building LFS without gcc, make, etc.

2005-04-12 Thread Rainer Peter Feller
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 11:14 +0200, Winter Andreas wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > > Winter Andreas wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > after having successfully build a running LFS, I tried to > > build a system > > > without gcc, make and other development tools (the goal is > > to build a > > > minimal syst

RE: Building LFS without gcc, make, etc.

2005-04-12 Thread Winter Andreas
> > On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 11:14:29 +0200 > Winter Andreas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Yes, good book. I have followed the book and everything worked. But > > now I want to end up whith a system without any development > tools. Of > > course I can try to manually remove gcc, etc after the bui

Re: Building LFS without gcc, make, etc.

2005-04-12 Thread lanas
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 11:14:29 +0200 Winter Andreas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, good book. I have followed the book and everything worked. But > now I want to end up whith a system without any development tools. Of > course I can try to manually remove gcc, etc after the build. > And remember

RE: Building LFS without gcc, make, etc.

2005-04-12 Thread Winter Andreas
Hi Andrew, > Winter Andreas wrote: > > Hi, > > > > after having successfully build a running LFS, I tried to > build a system > > without gcc, make and other development tools (the goal is > to build a > > minimal system). So I started by skipping the corresponding > sections in chap > > 6. >

Re: Building LFS without gcc, make, etc.

2005-04-12 Thread Andrew Benton
Winter Andreas wrote: Hi, after having successfully build a running LFS, I tried to build a system without gcc, make and other development tools (the goal is to build a minimal system). So I started by skipping the corresponding sections in chap 6. Don't skip anything. Follow the book. Good book. Q