Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Jeremy Huntwork wrote these words on 08/15/07 07:20 CST:
>
>
>> I would love to see some sort of proper support for PM go into LFS, but
>> that all depends on the community...
>>
>
> I'll go on record as -1.
>
> I feel we should mention it, provide links to the vari
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> david567 wrote these words on 08/15/07 10:56 CST:
>
>> Randy McMurchy wrote:
>>
>>> I feel we should mention it, provide links to the various alternatives,
>>> and drive on. We are not a distribution. We are a book that shows h
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> I can't see it happening in BLFS for the simple reason that it would
> be a monumental task (automating the proper inserts could perhaps be
> done, but we wouldn't do that until *every* package has been tested,
> which again would be monumental).
>
>
The 'BLFS' task is al
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> david567 wrote these words on 08/15/07 11:45 CST:
>
>> Randy McMurchy wrote:
>>
>
>
>> Indeed, the book would need to be the implementation.
>>
>
> My point exactly. You are suggesting a total implentation, where
I always backup $LFS/tools before changing ownership. Some undetected
errors can still be resolved before, but not after, changing ownership.
I suggest the 'Caution' before the command. Also the last paragraph
and the caution are redundant.
FWIW
---
David Jensen
--
http://linuxfromscratch.
