Randy McMurchy wrote: > Jeremy Huntwork wrote these words on 08/15/07 07:20 CST: > > >> I would love to see some sort of proper support for PM go into LFS, but >> that all depends on the community... >> > > I'll go on record as -1. > > I feel we should mention it, provide links to the various alternatives, > and drive on. We are not a distribution. We are a book that shows how > to compile Linux from scratch. Let's don't forget that. > No, lets not forget that. However, showing an implementation of package management is not in any way detrimental to the education of readers. > Package management is beyond the scope of showing how to compile > packages (and which packages to compile). > > I'm not convinced one way or the other. PM is not what makes linux tick, but it may help keep it ticking.
--- David Jensen -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
