he installation should be
identical.
What if gcc-5 is released tomorrow and LFS upgrades to it but BLFS
says - "We are a different project and no one on blfs-dev wants to
upgrade to the new release so BLFS will just stick with gcc-4." The
situation you are mentioning is quite similar.
-
On 1/20/06, Jim Gifford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tushar Teredesai wrote:
> > On 1/20/06, Jim Gifford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> This discussion needs to happen on both lfs-dev and cross-lfs, everyone
> >> in lfs-dev seems to want it, but p
(which most users may install down the line
anyways), there is no extra space and memory being taken up. The
various language man-pages and various locales are already being
installed, the disk space is already taken up. Just check out the
/usr/share/locale and /usr/share/man dire
gh, I had assumed that the editors would have tested it out before
putting it in the book. But as Jermey said, he thought all that had
already been done.
--
Tushar Teredesai
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/
sed unless you have -B/usr/bin/.
Correct. Sorry I missed that when I posted. It was in my wrapper
script and is also in DIY.
--
Tushar Teredesai
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromsc
201 - 205 of 205 matches
Mail list logo
