The mirrors listed at
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/packages.html#packages have
one-big-tarball versions of the packages and patches for all the
previous releases... but not this one.
Is the current tarball anywhere?
Rob
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://w
On 06/27/2011 10:47 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Rob Landley wrote:
>> The mirrors listed at
>> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/packages.html#packages have
>> one-big-tarball versions of the packages and patches for all the
>> previous releases... but not this one.
&
In the "LFS and Standards" part of the 6.8 preface, it lists the Single
Unix Specification Version 3. A couple points:
A) SUSv4 shipped in 2008.
B) SUSv4 actually comes from (and is approved by) other standards
bodies, it's also known as POSIX-2008, IEEE Std 1003.1, and The Open
Group base speci
I'm automating LFS 6.8, and two of the patches don't apply with busybox
patch:
1) gcc-4.5.2-startfiles_fix-1.patch
Requires "fuzz" support, which I didn't implement because it tends to
mis-apply patches. (This is not the same as applying at an offset, this
is discarding context lines in order to
On 07/08/2011 11:00 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> 2) rm "$SRCDIR"/procps-3.2.8-fix_HZ_errors-1.patch || exit 1
>
>> The path has a "//" which means -p1 winds up with an absolute path after
>> discarding one "/".
>
> I'm not sure what you mean here with the 'rm ... |exit 1', but the patch
> applies c
On 04/01/2013 04:59:50 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
> > I'd seen comments on the kernel list about bc being required in
> > 3.9, and then forgotten about them (on my desktops I have it anyway,
> > for xscreensaver). It gets used for kernel/timeconst.h
> > https://patchwork.kernel.o
On 04/01/2013 04:59:50 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I don't mind adding it to LFS. It's one of the first things I build
> because I use it in my scripts for measuring build size.
>
> An additional package to move from LFS might be lsb_release-1.4 to
> complement what we have in Section 9.1.
And I ha
On 05/03/2013 09:54:42 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I'm going to write a program to automatically identify out of date
> packages for LFS. Has anyone already done such a beast?
>
> As I review the packages, it seems that the only constant is
> inconsistency. Trying to parse versions is quite package
On 05/14/2013 01:59:08 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> 2. Also, I did a test of setting /etc/mtab as a symlink to
> /proc/mounts
> and it seems to work properly although the output of 'mount' is a bit
> more verbose. My objection of 'mount' not specifying the device for
> the
> rootfs is fixed. I th
On 05/31/2013 05:49:45 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Armin K. wrote:
> > On 06/01/2013 12:27 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> >> Is there any interest in LFS for the Pi?
>
> > From what I've heard - it's an ARM board.
>
> That's right.
>
> > LFS only supports x86/x86_64
> > and it doesn't support cross-
10 matches
Mail list logo
