Hi,
I am looking at the 6.4 release and the current development build
methods. Comparing Chapter 5.4 (toolchain/binutils - pass 1), 6.4 (and
6.3) have the line:
CC="gcc -B/usr/bin/" ../binutils-2.18/configure ...
whereas the development build has:
../binutils-2.19/configure --target=$LF
2008/12/16 Jeremy Huntwork :
> Reece Dunn wrote:
>> Is this an intentional change - for example, as a result of the new
>> build method - or is it an accidental result of the merge of Jeremy's
>> 64-bit support? That is, does the --target= remove the need for the
>>
Matthew Burges wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > So I think the project needs a challenge. Trouble is I can't think what
> > it is!
>
> Yep, and that's why I can both understand Randy's and the community's
> concerns about the lack of activity, but then wonder what activity it is
> they'
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 09:48:23PM +0100, Reece Dunn wrote:
> >
> > LFS is an ideal distribution for be, because:
> > * I already know how to use bash, rm, tar and the like from cygwin;
> > * it gives me the opportunity to discover Linux things
Hi,
These are some scripts I have written to auto-detect what network card
and cd drive udev rules to use:
cat > detect-cd << "EOF"
#!/bin/bash
# Written by Reece H. Dunn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
for block in `find /sys/block -maxdepth 1 -name [sh]d* | sed 's@/sys@@'`; do
udevtest ${block} > tmp/ud
On 30/09/2007, Bryan Kadzban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: RIPEMD160
>
> Reece Dunn wrote:
> > These are some scripts I have written to auto-detect what network
> > card and cd drive udev rules to use:
>
> Any reason you
Hi,
In the sections on building the Linux headers from the kernel sources,
the build instructions are (for section 6):
make mrproper
make headers_check
make INSTALL_HDR_PATH=dest headers_install
cp -rv dest/include/* /usr/include
What is the rationale behind the last two lines? W
On 21/11/2007, Thomas Trepl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Reece,
>
> On Wednesday 21 November 2007 21:35:48 Reece Dunn wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > In the sections on building the Linux headers from the kernel sources,
> > the build instructions are (fo
On 14/12/2007, Alexander E. Patrakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The problem for the LFS family of projects is that he was the only
> active jhalfs developer, thus, the ALFS project either needs
> additional developers, or has to be officially declared no longer
> existing. Any voluntee
Here are my answers for my current (and planned future) use of LFS:
On 03/03/2008, Alexander E. Patrakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [ ] I am an editor of LFS or one of the related projects
> [X] I use LFS as my primary Linux system
> [X] I use LFS on more than one PC (including virtual machin
2008/10/11 Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi all,
>
> There's a minor ticket about explaining what the installation
> commands in the Linux Headers installation do, and it occurred
> to me that is it possible that there's a redundant step?
...
> Now here is where I don't really see the need
11 matches
Mail list logo
