On 07/28/2010 10:36 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
>
>> On Jul 28, 2010, at 1:07 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>
>>> Section 6.3 discusses PM. It says why we don't have PM in the
>>> book.
>>>
>>> There are six hints on PM.
>>>
>> These sorts of replies are discouragin
This is a continuation of a discussion that began on lfs-support.
I think that using the wiki is a great idea *once we have something to
put there.* I think that the first thing we need to do is update the
hint sans any of the "neat" stuff we've thought about. For example,
incorporating the s
On 08/01/2010 05:29 PM, Timothy Rice wrote:
> No, I'm not currently building a base system. You're correct that we
> should focus on updating the hint first. I can probably still contribute
> to Part I of the hint, and to the scripts.
>
> There are three more ideas I want to put out there before we
On 08/01/2010 05:29 PM, Timothy Rice wrote:
> Well, that has about laid on the table all my thoughts on package users to
> date. Opinions? How much should go in the core hint, and how much should
> be relegated to an appendix or to an "advanced" section of the wiki?
>
I forgot about your last
On 08/02/2010 10:33 AM, jxa...@verizon.net wrote:
>> Aug 2, 2010 10:03:02 AM, Dan wrote:
>>
>>
>> For the sake of this discussion let's assume that basic LFS and a "no
>> frills" package users system comprise a "first build." If we update the
>> hint properly, then this build should go without a hi
On 08/02/2010 12:34 PM, jxa...@verizon.net wrote:
> .How do you back out of a problematic installation
> to trouble-shoot? Let's say I run into a permissions problem and make install
> only partially works and then spits out a bunch of errors. Obviously, the
> package
> is not fully installed,
On 08/04/2010 10:38 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Not that it makes any difference to this discussion, but I prefer to use
/usr/src/(pkgname)/ for source tarballs. I sometimes build there and
sometimes in /tmp
e.g.
DIR=`pwd`
PROGRAM=xchat-2.6.2
LOG=$DIR/$PROGRAM.log
TITLE=$PROGRAM
TIMEFORMAT="$TIMEFM
On 02/18/2011 10:46 PM, Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> When doing chapter 6 as a non-root user (package-user hint), pt_chown is
> being run due to the options we use to mount $LFS/dev/pts early in
> chapter 6. Since it's not installed setuid-root, it doesn't work.
>
> But it shouldn't be needed; if we cha
In adjusting to retiring--yes I'm bragging--I got lazy and didn't stay
involved in LFS. After ruining three laptops with Ubuntu because of
video drivers, I'm up and running again and want to do an LFS build.
I want to build along side Windows 8 and am interested in grub and
UEFI. I wanted to
On 10/04/2013 12:47 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Dan McGhee wrote:
>> In adjusting to retiring--yes I'm bragging--I got lazy and didn't stay
>> involved in LFS. After ruining three laptops with Ubuntu because of
>> video drivers, I'm up and running again and want
DJ Lucas wrote:
Well, I was successful with jdk-1.5.0_05 build from source and OOo
build. Unfortunately, the configure check is broken for BDB in
OOo-2.0.1, so I used the internal version without the db4.4 patch.
Configure couldn't determine the version string, but I don't imagine
that'll be
On 12/21/2013 02:55 PM, Armin K. wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> After many months since lfs systemd branch was created, I am pleased to
> announce that I consider it being usable for everyone that wants to use it.
>
> I've managed to add missing bits to the branch today and doing that I've
> finished wh
12 matches
Mail list logo