On Sun, Nov 23, at 09:51 Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> The Linux From Scratch community is pleased to announce the release of LFS
> Version 6.4. This release includes numerous changes to
> LFS-6.3 (including update to Linux-2.6.27.4, GCC-4.3.2, Glibc-2.8) and
> security
> fixes. It also includes editorial
Hi,
Is the following command correct in the db page, or I am missing
something obvious?
chown -Rv root:root /usr/share/doc/db-4.7.25
~
Regards,
Ag.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above inf
On Sun, Dec 14, at 10:10 Agathoklis D. Hatzimanikas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is the following command correct in the db page, or I am missing
> something obvious?
>
> chown -Rv root:root /usr/share/doc/db-4.7.25
> ~
>
Please disregard. I am trying a new metho
- Forwarded message from William Immendorf
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 21:35:41 -0500
Hey Ag,
A while back, Colin Watson (Debian's Groff maintainer and the
maintainer of Man-DB) and I had an email relay between each other about
the update to Groff 1.20.1. Recently, Colin responded with more info
On Mon, Mar 23, at 07:12 Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> If you were looking at a system (not just a computer system) and you
> found that one part took twice the resources and twice as long to
> start up as another part offering similar functionalit
On Mon, Mar 23, at 05:52 Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Agathoklis D. Hatzimanikas wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 23, at 07:12 Dan Nicholson wrote:
> >> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> >>
> >> If you were looking at a system (not just a computer system) a
On Mon, Mar 23, at 05:45 Archaic wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:02:07PM +0200, Agathoklis D. Hatzimanikas wrote:
> >
> > Yes, this came up a few times and there is no reason to repeat
> > ourselves. I think the consensus was that following established standards
> >
On Wed, Apr 01, at 07:19 Spencer Collyer wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:40:30 -0600, Archaic wrote:
> > The vimrc that LFS creates is very spartan. There is a default
> > configuration that isn't bad plus it gives new users a quick idea of
> > how powerful the rc can be.
> >
> > cp runtime/vimrc_
On Wed, Apr 01, at 04:50 Archaic wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 09:22:47PM +0300, Agathoklis D. Hatzimanikas wrote:
> >
> > Actually Tony answered me, that the most
> > sane solution is to source mswin.vim which offers a more nice environment.
>
> Was he referrin
On Sat, Apr 25, at 10:00 Dan Nicholson wrote:
> Hi everyone,
Hi Dan,
It's little bit difficult to me to find the right words and to speak
about you ...
anyway we have a quite expressive word down here (Χαρμολύπη - that I can't
find the definition in English, I don't think there is a single englis
On Sat, Jul 18, at 10:44 Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Matthew Burgess wrote these words on 07/18/09 10:05 CST:
>
> > The Linux From Scratch community is pleased to announce the release of
> > LFS Version 6.5 Release Candidate 1.
> > [snip]
> > It is our intention to release LFS-6.5 final within 2 week
Hi Andy,
On Wed, Jan 06, at 12:12 Andrew Benton wrote:
> Hello,
> I've been using one of the newer file systems in the kernel, NILFS2, on
> my Dell netbook. It has some features which work well on flash memory
> but it also has some quirks which made it difficult to set up at first.
> When you m
Hi Ken,
On Tue, Jan 19, at 08:03 Ken Moffat wrote:
> We've always used current kernels in the book, but many of our users
> seem to have a distinct unwillingness to upgrade to newer kernels.
> This week, Greg KH formally announced that he intends to maintain
> 2.6.32 long-term
> http://www.kroah.c
On Wed, Jan 27, at 12:41 ICMP Request wrote:
> Hello guys! I haven't had time to see much of the discussions of the
> list, so sorry if it was asked recently, but either on stable and also
> on dev versions of the book you are still creating an ext3 filesystem
> instead of ext4. I would like to
On Sun, Feb 21, at 02:05 William Immendorf wrote:
> Hey all...
>
> Since Nouveau appeared in Linux-2.6.33, many distros backported the
> Nouveau patches (including Fedora) to the 2.6.32.* kernel. I was think
> LFS should do this two, and I was planning on making a split Trac
> ticket for Nouveau:
On Sat, Mar 13, at 03:37 stosss wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 7:13 PM, +Jan wrote:
> >
> > I stopped reading right here. It is their book.
Absolutely disagree.
This book doesn't belong to none specific. It has been written to show
to the world how to make a usable operating system from plain
On Sun, Oct 05, at 03:00 DJ Lucas wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> > I have added a new milestone, 6.4, for the current effort. It can be
> > removed if
> > the consensus is that what we are currently working should be 7.0.
> >
> > My understanding is that we are updating the packages currently i
Hi Bruce,
On Sun, Oct 05, at 12:49 Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> That seems reasonable.It
> would not be hard to branch a 6.3.1 from 6.3 and commit changes to that as
> appropriate. I'm not sure what the release procedures should be. Do we do
> a
> -rc1, etc for a minor errata change? I am thin
On Sun, Oct 12, at 11:56 Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 10/12/08 11:46 CST:
>
> > Usually the reason is because the path to the tools gets built into
> > another script/program. In the dependencies appendix, it says that sed
> > must be built before e2fsprogs. I think i
19 matches
Mail list logo
