The commit for -rc1 was on Feb 16. Since then there have been text
changes plus the following:
Update kmod to install man pages properly.
Delete symlinks in /usr and add /usr/libexec.
Add a patch for glibc FHS issues.
There is also ticket #3705. It really looks like a user error to me,
but I'
> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 13:15:10 -0600
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> To: LFS Developers Mailinglist
> Subject: [lfs-dev] Are we ready for LFS-7.5?
>
> The commit for -rc1 was on Feb 16. Since then there have been text
> changes plus the following:
>
> Update kmod to install man pages properly.
> Delet
On 28.2.2014 20:15, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> The commit for -rc1 was on Feb 16. Since then there have been text
> changes plus the following:
>
> Update kmod to install man pages properly.
> Delete symlinks in /usr and add /usr/libexec.
> Add a patch for glibc FHS issues.
>
> There is also ticket #370
akhiezer wrote:
>> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 13:15:10 -0600
>> From: Bruce Dubbs
>> To: LFS Developers Mailinglist
>> Subject: [lfs-dev] Are we ready for LFS-7.5?
>>
>> The commit for -rc1 was on Feb 16. Since then there have been text
>> changes plus the following:
>>
>> Update kmod to install man
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 01:15:10PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> So the questions is whether we should release 7.5 tomorrow or not. We
> could wait for BLFS, but I'm not sure that's really necessary.
>
As far as I am concerned, LFS -rc1 seems fine : but I've only built
it on x86_64 desktops (t
Em 28-02-2014 18:23, Ken Moffat escreveu:
> i686, nor if we should care.
Is i686 gong to be deprecated?
--
[]s,
Fernando
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> Em 28-02-2014 18:23, Ken Moffat escreveu:
>
>> i686, nor if we should care.
>
> Is i686 gong to be deprecated?
I don't think so. My main system is still a 686, but I don't normally
do a full development on it. If we don't have the hardware, then we
could always bu
