Please treat this with the proverbial pinch of salt - my
buildscripts can't build bison-3.0 on either x86_64 or i686, so it
is possible that something in them is also breaking this.
But ...
Trying to build i686 svn (from LFS-7.2) on a machine capable of
64-bits, gmp failed with
ABI=32: command
Ken Moffat wrote:
> Please treat this with the proverbial pinch of salt - my
> buildscripts can't build bison-3.0 on either x86_64 or i686, so it
> is possible that something in them is also breaking this.
>
> But ...
>
> Trying to build i686 svn (from LFS-7.2) on a machine capable of
> 64-bi
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 07:25:01PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
> > Please treat this with the proverbial pinch of salt - my
> > buildscripts can't build bison-3.0 on either x86_64 or i686, so it
> > is possible that something in them is also breaking this.
> >
> > But ...
> >
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 01:38:19AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 07:25:01PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> >
> > This is quite odd. I assume you are using bash. The man page clearly says:
> >
> > SHELL GRAMMAR
> > Simple Commands
> > A simple command is a sequence
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 01:38:19AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 07:25:01PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>>
>>> This is quite odd. I assume you are using bash. The man page clearly says:
>>>
>>> SHELL GRAMMAR
>>> Simple Commands
>>> A simple c
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 08:05:26PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
> >>
> > I'll also note that most of my non-LFS linux experience is with the
> > kernel. So, I know that documentation is not to be trusted.
> >
> > Maybe the bash version/patch we are using doesn't match the
> >
bdu...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote:
> Package LFS Upstream Flag
> glibc 2.17 2.18 *
> perl5.18.0 5.18.1 *
Two relatively important packages just changed. Looking at the change
logs, I didn't see anything that would change the book's instruction
