On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 08:37 +0300, lfs-...@whamra.com wrote:
> in 6.13, the binutils page, there are sed commands to fix the tests, one is:
>
> sed -i "/exception_defines.h/d" ld/testsuite/ld-elf/new.cc
>
> though it doesn't seem to change anything :S i can't find any
> "exception_defines.h" in t
On 06/05/2012 01:27 PM, Matt Burgess wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 08:37 +0300, lfs-...@whamra.com wrote:
>> in 6.13, the binutils page, there are sed commands to fix the tests, one is:
>>
>> sed -i "/exception_defines.h/d" ld/testsuite/ld-elf/new.cc
>>
>> though it doesn't seem to change anything
On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 13:33 +0200, Armin K. wrote:
> sed -i "s/-fvtable-gc //" ld/testsuite/ld-selective/selective.exp
>
> Also, if I remember correctly, this one only removes -fvtable-gc from
> comment. There isn't any line of code.
Yeah, I removed that in r9878 too. It's in a comment and als
On 6/5/12 2:05 AM, g@free.fr wrote:
> This make me smile a lot.
> There is much more dependencies in perl than just glibc and linux packages.
> Check a bit your log with
> grep -rl 'perl '
Getting perl hits in your logs does not always equate to actual
dependency. Configure scripts may check
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 01:26:34PM +0800, xinglp wrote:
> I got it. We need to sed configure.ac instead of configure.
> configure was regenerated after ./configure
Doh! Sometimes I'm a slow learner : Bryan explained this a little
while ago. In this case, sedding configure.ac and then manual
- Mail original -
> De: "Jeremy Huntwork"
> À: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
> Envoyé: Mardi 5 Juin 2012 16:09:51
> Objet: Re: [lfs-dev] popt in the book?
>
> On 6/5/12 2:05 AM, g@free.fr wrote:
> > This make me smile a lot.
> > There is much more dependencies in perl than just glib
On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 17:35 +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 01:26:34PM +0800, xinglp wrote:
> > I got it. We need to sed configure.ac instead of configure.
> > configure was regenerated after ./configure
>
> Doh! Sometimes I'm a slow learner
You and me both, evidentally..
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 09:51:23PM +0100, Matt Burgess wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 17:35 +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 01:26:34PM +0800, xinglp wrote:
> > > I got it. We need to sed configure.ac instead of configure.
> > > configure was regenerated after ./configure
>
The discussion is about the feasibility of removing perl from *LFS* - all of
the packages you listed except GCC are outside of LFS
Sent from my iThingy
On 6/06/2012, at 8:10, g@free.fr wrote:
>
>
> - Mail original -
>> De: "Jeremy Huntwork"
>> À: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
>>
I have built linux-3.4.1 in five machines. No problems, as with the
unstable 3.4.0, which required a patch or sed for one of the machines.
I repeat being grateful to all editors and contributors of (B)LFS. With
most respect, write the following lines to defend myself.
One can see in https://www.k
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 09:51:23PM +0100, Matt Burgess wrote:
>> Why is sedding configure not enough? I don't doubt it isn't, but
>> can't think why. My understanding is that configure.ac is used as
>> input to generate configure. Therefore, whatever Makefile rules
>> are in
- Mail original -
> De: "Steve Crosby"
> À: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
> Cc: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
> Envoyé: Mercredi 6 Juin 2012 03:53:43
> Objet: Re: [lfs-dev] popt in the book?
>
> The discussion is about the feasibility of removing perl from *LFS* -
> all of the packages
On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 08:07 +0200, g@free.fr wrote:
> Except I say there is more perl scripts as I reported only the one with a .pl
> name.
> automake scripts as reported by Bryan Kadzban need perl, autoreconf is a perl
> script.
That's fine. Nothing (well, nearly nothing) in LFS requires
13 matches
Mail list logo
