On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 17:35 +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 01:26:34PM +0800, xinglp wrote: > > I got it. We need to sed configure.ac instead of configure. > > configure was regenerated after ./configure .... > > Doh! Sometimes I'm a slow learner
You and me both, evidentally... > : Bryan explained this a little > while ago. In this case, sedding configure.ac and then manually > running autoreconf seems better Why is sedding configure not enough? I don't doubt it isn't, but can't think why. My understanding is that configure.ac is used as input to generate configure. Therefore, whatever Makefile rules are in place to regenerate configure should be triggered if configure.ac has a modification time later than configure. By sedding configure, you ensure that isn't the case and therefore the rebuild rules shouldn't be triggered, right? Anyway, thanks for fixing this, Ken. Is this suitable for submission upstream so we don't have to carry it around for too long? Thanks, Matt. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
