Hi all,
As those of you who have been following ticket #2205 have already seen, DJ &
Randy have been doing stirling work in getting some much needed life injected
back into the LFS book. Although they've had commit privs to the LFS repo for
a while, out of what I can only assume is down to she
CC'ing to lfs-dev, if I've remembered to change to a subscribed
address.
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 04:54:33PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 03:48:50PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:27:09PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > I've been looking into the ad
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 09:39:16AM -0600, Matthew Burgess wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As those of you who have been following ticket #2205 have already seen, DJ &
> Randy have been doing stirling work in getting some much needed life injected
> back into the LFS book. Although they've had commit privs
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 09:39:16AM -0600, Matthew Burgess wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> As those of you who have been following ticket #2205 have already seen, DJ &
>> Randy have been doing stirling work in getting some much needed life
>> injected back into the LFS book. Alth
Ken Moffat wrote:
> Pleased to see you guys have accepted this. I'm not sure that
> offering you a welcome is appropriate, you've both been here longer
> than I have, but for sure you have my support.
Actually, just for the record, I'm a newbie in LFS compared
to Ken. He's overestimating my time
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Actually, just for the record, I'm a newbie in LFS compared
> to Ken. He's overestimating my time here. I remember my first
> post to an LFS list and was drilled my an ex-member (who I
> won't name) for "which list", when he thought that my post
> didn't belong in LFS-Dev. :
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 04:54:33PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 03:48:50PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:27:09PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
>>>
Modern versions of man-db default to expecting UTF-8 for ma
Matthew Burgess wrote:
> As those of you who have been following ticket #2205 have already seen, DJ &
> Randy
Congrats guys! I wouldn't say I've been monitoring LFS in the past few
months, but now and then I'd look around to see what's going on and it's
nice to see that there's still some bit o
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> Matthew Burgess wrote:
>> As those of you who have been following ticket #2205 have already seen, DJ &
>> Randy
>
> Congrats guys! I wouldn't say I've been monitoring LFS in the past few
> months, but now and then I'd look around to see what's going on and it's
> nice t
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> To me, I'd like to see two things. First, an update to the packages. This
> is
> relatively straight forward, but of course has a lot of detail.
I think DJ and Randy are handling that so far? I wouldn't mind lending
some fingertips and half a brain here but I've not yet c
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> To me, I'd like to see two things. First, an update to the packages. This
>> is
>> relatively straight forward, but of course has a lot of detail.
>
> I think DJ and Randy are handling that so far? I wouldn't mind lending
> some fingertips and ha
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> The new page would introduce the issues and provide information for a user to
> use to decide if they want a 32-bit system or a 64-bit system. Yes, I think
> that page is necessary.
Hmmm. Alright. That will require some thought and a bit of research, I
think. I suppose I c
-----
PACKAGE="GLibC" VERSION="2.8-20080930" /tools/bin/lfsinst
--
./configure {...}
--
make
--
make install
--
exit 0
DJ Lucas wrote:
> Probably after the next release, but I was driving down the road a few
> minutes ago, and I had a very simple idea on that. It involves a little
> scripting, added to the book for each supported PM. "supported PM" ==
> "A developer is interested in maintaining it" It would a
On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 19:07:26 -0500
Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
> > Pleased to see you guys have accepted this. I'm not sure that
> > offering you a welcome is appropriate, you've both been here longer
> > than I have, but for sure you have my support.
>
> Actua
15 matches
Mail list logo
