On Wed, Mar 19, at 11:52 J. Greenlees wrote:
[...]
> Both sections need to be made as simple and clear as possible, with the
> absolute minimum required for a functional system to be base system
> standard.
While I understand your points and I can't but I agree with you, I am
not sure if we can c
Ag. D. Hatzimanikas wrote:
> Example? The common usage of /usr. Convenient but fundamental broken.
>>From all the BLFS packages the half or even more, (they) really bellongs
> to /usr/local hierarchy.
Why should they be in /usr/local? If a package is in the book, it is
part of the "distro" and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ag. D. Hatzimanikas wrote:
>
>> Example? The common usage of /usr. Convenient but fundamental
>> broken. From all the BLFS packages the half or even more, (they)
>> really bellongs to /usr/local hierarchy.
>
> Why should t
On Fri, Mar 21, at 05:47 Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> Therefore, I believe that BLFS is fine installing stuff into
> /usr. But it depends on what you see as the definition of "the distro".
Yes, is a controversial material at the minimum and I guess we can also
interpret FHS differently and so on and so
