Ag. D. Hatzimanikas wrote: > Example? The common usage of /usr. Convenient but fundamental broken. >>From all the BLFS packages the half or even more, (they) really bellongs > to /usr/local hierarchy.
Why should they be in /usr/local? If a package is in the book, it is part of the "distro" and should be in /usr (or /bin or /sbin). If a user installs something that is *not* in the common blfs, then /usr/local (or /opt) is available for that. Then again, a user can put things wherever they want. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
