Hey Jonathan,
I got your point man, and your are completely right.
It was not my objective to start a security discussion
over all aspects of LFS's security, I knew that this
could lead in a loose of focus.
But now I got what you mean and understood how the
projects deals with these issues.
Tha
> On Mon, 03 Mar2008 "Alexander E. Patrakov" wrote:
>
> Please reply to this message (please, limit this to the
> lfs-dev list only) and mark with "X" the items that apply.
> If the answer is not the same on your different Linux
> systems, write numbers of systems to which each
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 01:58:51AM -0600, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> If you mean that, then you won't go. Plain and simple.
I suppose I was a little rash and hasty. I've also been told that I'm
too sensitive and need a thicker skin. :)
The number of requests for me to stay (both here and in private)
TheOldFellow wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 08:30:50 +1100
> Greg Schafer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Having said that, I believe
>> PM should be a personal thing, which is why I would never advise anyone
>> "you must XYZ as your PM". ie: I would never select a default PM for LFS.
>
> On the other
Alexander E. Patrakov schrieb:
> Please reply to this message (please, limit this to the lfs-dev list
> only) and mark with "X" the items that apply. If the answer is not the
> same on your different Linux systems, write numbers of systems to
> which each answer applies instead of a simple "X" mark
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Jonathan Oksman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm working through the current development LFS book and one section
> struck me as a bit odd. In "6.9. Glibc-2.7":
>
> > The ldd shell script contains Bash-specific syntax. Change its default
> program interpreter
On 3/4/08, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This has been fixed upstream to use a better search for the bash
> interpreter that won't use the BASH variable, which is set by the
> shell. I don't recall when this went in, but the sed might not be
> needed anymore with glibc-2.7.
That's
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Jonathan Oksman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/4/08, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This has been fixed upstream to use a better search for the bash
> > interpreter that won't use the BASH variable, which is set by the
> > shell. I don't recall
First of all, I have to say the comments below are MHO. So if you're
disagree with them just ignore them.
On Monday 03 March 2008 12:55, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> [ ] I am an editor of LFS or one of the related projects
> [X] I use LFS as my primary Linux system
> [X] I use LFS on more than o
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I cut off part of your original message that I wished I hadn't. If, at
> the time of building glibc, /bin/sh points to dash, then configure
> will search for a bash program and set the variable BASH to that
> location. S
Do you have a running tally on this thread so-far, Alexander? I know,
some 30 replies hardly counts as a cross-section of the LFS community,
but at least it's a start by people who care to speak up so far.
I considered providing my own results but it seems I put an X in just
about every categor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 02/26/2008 09:15:07 PM:
> On Fri, Feb 22, at 11:53 Nathan Coulson wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 5:15 PM, DJ Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > > Nathan Coulson wrote:
> > > > I was playing w/ links in the linux framebuffer, and I came
> across this error
> > >
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 4:55 AM, Alexander E. Patrakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Please reply to this message (please, limit this to the lfs-dev list
> only) and mark with "X" the items that apply. If the answer is not the
> same on your different Linux systems, write numbers of systems to
> whi
2008/3/5, Gerard Beekmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Do you have a running tally on this thread so-far, Alexander? I know,
> some 30 replies hardly counts as a cross-section of the LFS community,
> but at least it's a start by people who care to speak up so far.
There is no intention to provide a ta
This thread is similar to the old thread by Gerard ("What if the book
wasn't a book anymore") by title, but not by intentions. The old
thread was just an invitation to brainstorming related to presentation
of ideas from the reader's viewpoint. This thread is meant to be more
technical and conservat
The more we discuss it, the more PM becomes a focal point. I agree with
Greg Schafer in that the actual choice of PM is a user's choice in the
end and shouldn't matter.
About all we should attempt to do is inform the user of all the main
stream and (perhaps) some of the not-so-mainstream option
DJ Lucas wrote:
> funopen.c:63:2: error: #error No known way to implement funopen.
It's looking for fopencookie(). Change in assuan took out their local
copy, and I guess the check is broken being it's not defined in
config.h, but since it's always in glibc, it's safe to work around it.
sed -
DJ Lucas wrote:
> sed -i "[EMAIL PROTECTED]@__GLIBC__@" \
> libkdenetwork/libgpgme-copy/assuan/funopen.c
Oops...needed for both assuan/funopen.c and gpgme/funopen.c
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsu
Jeremy relayed an idea in one of his emails that I brought up again.
Maybe you didn't see it, or maybe it just doesn't apply to the question
you posted. In which case, can you clarify what you are after as I must
have misunderstood.
A few years ago we had an idea that creates custom books for p
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 22:11:53 -0700
Gerard Beekmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The more we discuss it, the more PM becomes a focal point. I agree with
> Greg Schafer in that the actual choice of PM is a user's choice in the
> end and shouldn't matter.
>
> About all we should attempt to do is i
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
>
> So, please express your ideas in the following areas:
>
First and foremost, SLOW DOWN How about some baby steps instead of
leaps and bounds. The recent threads are going nowhere because we have
20 individual topics crammed into one thread. There have bee
21 matches
Mail list logo
