TheOldFellow wrote: > On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 08:30:50 +1100 > Greg Schafer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > <snip> Having said that, I believe >> PM should be a personal thing, which is why I would never advise anyone >> "you must XYZ as your PM". ie: I would never select a default PM for LFS. > > On the other hand, being of the educative-objective brigade, there's no > harm in showing a fully worked example. That's how I always view > SysVinit and the bootscripts in LFS. Maybe using Pacman as the example > would be better that RPM, given many people's (inexplicable, IMO) > antipathy to RedHat.
Excellent point. This has caused me to change my mind about including PM in the book. However, I'll probably not use it myself. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
