On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 01:41:21AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Robert Connolly wrote:
> > On Monday March 26 2007 01:11, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
What happened to trimming? I know gmail likes to hide quoted text,
but for the rest of us this is a bit of a pain. ;)
--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/
On 3/28/07, Jan Dvořák <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Connolly wrote:
> > Someone emailed me the fix for vimrc:
> >
> > if ("/usr/share/vim")
> > if has('syntax')
> > syntax on
> > endif
> > endif
> This snippet does not work for me.
>
> if (isdirectory("/usr/share/vim"))
>if has('synt
On Wednesday March 28 2007 10:20, Kevin Day wrote:
> Perhaps that is a test for syntax being supported in vim and not being
> available.
> In that case, have the /bin/vim built with syntax off and the
> /usr/bin/vim built with syntax.
>
> Hopefully the PREFIX has /usr/bin before /bin, this way the
Hello. With a small change to the vimrc file it looks like vim can be
installed to /bin without complaining about missing /usr:
if ("/usr/share/vim")
if has('syntax')
syntax on
endif
endif
Build Vim normally, then move /usr/bin/vim to /bin/vim. Some packages like
Sudo expect to find /usr/bi
Oops, sorry, I ment:
if (isdirectory("/usr/share/vim"))
syntax on
endif
On Wednesday March 28 2007 11:05, Robert Connolly wrote:
>...
> if ("/usr/share/vim")
> if has('syntax')
> syntax on
> endif
> endif
pgpH3mq4ausAK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman
Robert Connolly wrote these words on 03/28/07 10:09 CST:
> [snip top-posting]
I'm indifferent to your proposal, though I lean to doing it if
indeed it turns out that Vim works identically.
However, the reason I'm posting, Robert, is to ask you not to
top-post. We get on folks all the time about i
On Wednesday March 28 2007 11:17, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> However, the reason I'm posting, Robert, is to ask you not to
> top-post. We get on folks all the time about it, yet you as a
> developer in the community set a bad example when you do it.
Okay. I don't think I've read the faq/#netiquette b
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 11:05:51AM -0400, Robert Connolly wrote:
> It gives us an editor in /. I'm not sure about standards conformance, about
> moving vim to /bin, but its a pretty usefull thing to have in single user
> mode or whenever /usr isn't mounted.
That is true -- however, it'd be a goo
Hi there again,
reworked patch for Util-linux. The patch can be downloaded from
http://jh.gvn.cz/~jd870911/hlfs/openssl/util-linux-2.12r-openssl-2.patch
and patch to the book is attached for discussion. This relates to quite
old thread (can't find it right now) about making everything in the
On Wednesday March 28 2007 13:12, Jan Dvořák wrote:
> Hi there again,
>
> reworked patch for Util-linux. The patch can be downloaded from
> http://jh.gvn.cz/~jd870911/hlfs/openssl/util-linux-2.12r-openssl-2.patch
> and patch to the book is attached for discussion. This relates to quite
> old
I do apologize, some errors crawled in.
http://jh.gvn.cz/~jd870911/hlfs/openssl/util-linux-2.12r-openssl-3.patch
Index: chapter06/util-linux.xml
===
--- chapter06/util-linux.xml(revision 1042)
+++ chapter06/util-linux.xml(wor
11 matches
Mail list logo
