On Friday 23 February 2007 00:14, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Vladimir A. Pavlov wrote:
> > 2. May be it would be better if /etc/rc.d/rc (I mean the main rc
> >script. I don't remember how it's called in LFS) will run each
> >bootscript using
> >
> > script_name 2>&1 |tee -a /var/log/bootlog
> >
On 2/21/07, Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 2. Parallel bootscripts. Whilst the benefits and drawbacks of doing this are
> unclear at the moment (or at least I think they are), I'm all for having
> these worked on until such a point where folks interested in it can come to
> the lis
Hi folks.
At least Manuel and I are experiencing segfaults when using jhalfs. It occurs
during chapter06/stripping-again. I've narrowed the problem down
to /lib/lib{history,readline}.so.5.2. Can anyone else confirm that
performing the following command fails (either segfaults, or causes the
On 2/23/07, Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If anyone can confirm the above, could you also suggest an explanation as to
> why the above two libraries are problematic? I initially thought it was a
> problem specific to jhalfs, because of the way it executes scripts
> under /bin/bash
El Viernes, 23 de Febrero de 2007 19:39, Matthew Burgess escribió:
> If anyone can confirm the above, could you also suggest an explanation as
> to why the above two libraries are problematic? I initially thought it was
> a problem specific to jhalfs, because of the way it executes scripts under
El Viernes, 23 de Febrero de 2007 19:53, Dan Nicholson escribió:
> I think the issue in jhalfs may be because progress-bar.sh is using
> /bin/bash. Just a guess, but I saw the same issue before and that was
> what initially struck me.
Not, reducing the Makefile target to just:
116-strippingagain
On Friday 23 February 2007 19:08, M.Canales.es wrote:
> But Matthew confirmed that while testing the updates to GCC-4.1.2 and glibc
> branch_update patch, running the stripping command manually from inside the
> chroot jail hangs the shell, thus maybe there is other issues involved
> here.
Ah, sl
El Viernes, 23 de Febrero de 2007 20:18, Matthew Burgess escribió:
> Ah, slight clarification here! I'm actually running the command via the
> following (from chapter06/revisedchroot.html):
>
> sudo chroot $LFS /usr/bin/env -i \
> HOME=/root TERM=\"$TERM\" PS1='\u:\w\$ ' \
> PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/s
El Viernes, 23 de Febrero de 2007 20:26, M.Canales.es escribió:
> That should corfim that the issue is in jhalfs, not related with the book
> or the GCC/Glibc planned updates.
And fixed.
After knowing what was causing the segfault in both a full build and later in
my partial build tests, the fi
M.Canales.es wrote:
> El Viernes, 23 de Febrero de 2007 20:26, M.Canales.es escribió:
>
>> That should corfim that the issue is in jhalfs, not related with the book
>> or the GCC/Glibc planned updates.
>
> And fixed.
>
> After knowing what was causing the segfault in both a full build and later
Trying to clean out my inbox a bit and came upon this.
On 2/9/07, M.Canales.es <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> El Jueves, 8 de Febrero de 2007 21:49, Matthew Burgess escribió:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > Do you think it's worth creating a branch so we can work on updating the
> > book rendering infrastruct
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> Is this still going to happen. Manuel is obviously going to drive any
> changes, but I think any branches have to be created by Matthew or
> Bruce.
Actually, anyone with commit privs can create a tag or branch. It's
just a svn command away.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfrom
On 2/21/07, M.Canales.es <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> El Martes, 20 de Febrero de 2007 09:22, Dan Nicholson escribió:
>
> > > 3. Is m4 really needed in Chapter 5? I thought the only reason it was
> > > there was because of Binutils, but it doesn't need m4 now...
> >
> > Is that why? I have no idea,
On 2/20/07, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/19/07, Chris Staub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 1. Perhaps it should be made somewhat clearer that the "Linux-Headers"
> > installation comes from the kernel tarball. More than one user has come
> > into the IRC chat asking if it was the
14 matches
Mail list logo
