On 2/21/07, Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 2. Parallel bootscripts. Whilst the benefits and drawbacks of doing this are > unclear at the moment (or at least I think they are), I'm all for having > these worked on until such a point where folks interested in it can come to > the list with a hard-sell on why LFS should integrate them :-) If DJ and > everyone else are happy with having them in contrib, that's fine by me. If > you'd rather have a svn branch set up, just holler and it'll be yours.
I'd like to put these in a branch, lsb-bootscripts or something. I'd think there'd be more people hammering on them if there was a branch. Anyone interested? -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
