Re: locales, nls - supportable or not?

2006-11-21 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Dan Nicholson wrote: No one here understands glibc. Should that be removed from the book? No, because the current level of understanding (explanation of ./configure switches, list of installed files and trivial configuration instructions) is complete enough for LFS purposes. Almost nobody as

Re: locales, nls - supportable or not?

2006-11-21 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Dan Nicholson wrote: On 11/18/06, Alexander E. Patrakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Didn't work for input or for output? Please paste your /etc/sysconfig/console and $LANG, and let me see if anything is wrong. Here's what I was using before I commented it out: #FONT="lat1-16 -m 8859-1" #UNICOD

Re: locales, nls - supportable or not?

2006-11-21 Thread Vladimir A. Pavlov
On Saturday 18 November 2006 18:37, Dan Nicholson wrote: > On 11/18/06, Alexander E. Patrakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thus, I insist that for every little thing that is present in the > > book, there must be an editor who understands it fully. If there is > > no such editor, this thing has t

Use of unionfs to build lfs in stage 5 en 6.

2006-11-21 Thread Stef Bon
Hello all, well I've posted a howto on howtoforge with something about LFS: http://www.howtoforge.com/ihlfs_full_control_over_what_youre_installing It's about the control you can get over a installation (or everything that does modifications on your system) with the use of unionfs and chroot. Y

Re: blowfish patch

2006-11-21 Thread Robert Connolly
The md5sum was wrong, that may be why it wasn't put in patches/hlfs/svn/. I fixed the md5sum, hopefully it will show up tommorrow. robert On Thursday 16 November 2006 11:47, DHAJOGLO wrote: > Under 20061016 it calls for the optional glibc blowfish patch. However, > its not in the group of patch

BLFS Project

2006-11-21 Thread Randy McMurchy
Hi all, I know I'm guilty as much as anyone for lack of contribution recently, though I *have* tried a couple of times to get something done, but Belgarath ended up being down, or I could not send mail, or whatever. I don't believe this Belgarath upgrade is going to happen, and the project is com

Re: BLFS Project

2006-11-21 Thread Jim Gifford
Randy McMurchy wrote: Hi all, I know I'm guilty as much as anyone for lack of contribution recently, though I *have* tried a couple of times to get something done, but Belgarath ended up being down, or I could not send mail, or whatever. I don't believe this Belgarath upgrade is going to happen,