Re: LFS 6.2 toolchain versions

2006-04-11 Thread Matt Darcy
Archaic wrote: Let me answer that with an example. gcc-4.0.x and mysql 5.0.{16,18,19} produce problems. I'd be interested in seeing the problems [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc-4.0.2/configure --prefix=/usr --libexecdir=/u

Re: Adding newer headers to llh (Was Re: merging udev_update branch)

2006-04-11 Thread Matt Darcy
Archaic wrote: I would like to hear from Jim and everyone working on the header project regarding this possibility: Find the headers that llh currently lacks that glibc-2.3.6 and linux-2.6.16.x both support and patch them into llh. The only thing that comes to mind is inotify support. Headers t

Re: Adding newer headers to llh (Was Re: merging udev_update branch)

2006-04-11 Thread Matt Darcy
Jim Gifford wrote: Another option here is to use the headers package I've been working with a lot of people. It compiles a base LFS and CLFS with no issues at all.http://ftp.jg555.com/headers/linux-headers-2.6.16.2.tar.bz2, or roll your own by using http://ftp.jg555.com/headers/headers. For

Re: Adding newer headers to llh (Was Re: merging udev_update branch)

2006-04-11 Thread Feldmeier Bernd
Hi All, as for educational purpose I think I would be good to use an original kernel and then apply the header script. This shows that there is some magic around that stuff. Releasing "only" a package is only useful for advanced users I think. regards Bernd Jim Gifford wrote: > Another option

Re: Adding newer headers to llh (Was Re: merging udev_update branch)

2006-04-11 Thread Matt Darcy
Feldmeier Bernd wrote: Hi All, as for educational purpose I think I would be good to use an original kernel and then apply the header script. This shows that there is some magic around that stuff. Releasing "only" a package is only useful for advanced users I think. regards Bernd Surly that

Re: LFS 6.2 toolchain versions

2006-04-11 Thread Archaic
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 08:20:31AM +0100, Matt Darcy wrote: > > I'd be interested in seeing the problems http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/1879 -- Archaic Want control, education, and security from your operating system? Hardened Linux From Scratch http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hl

Re: Adding newer headers to llh (Was Re: merging udev_update branch)

2006-04-11 Thread Archaic
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 10:11:19AM +0100, Matt Darcy wrote: > > b.) multiple platforms to support - eg system built from 2.6.15 2.6.16 > and 2.6.17-rc2 headers - then couple that with users deviating from the > book's package versions, well, it will just become unsupportable and not > help LFS'

Re: Enscript Security Patch

2006-04-11 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Randy McMurchy wrote: Hi Alexander, Hello! Could you look at http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/1799 and review the report I put in it yesterday? Thanks. When trying to recreate and reatach the patch, I got: === Trac detected an internal er

Re: Adding newer headers to llh (Was Re: merging udev_update branch)

2006-04-11 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Archaic wrote: On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 10:11:19AM +0100, Matt Darcy wrote: b.) multiple platforms to support - eg system built from 2.6.15 2.6.16 and 2.6.17-rc2 headers - then couple that with users deviating from the book's package versions, well, it will just become unsupportable and not hel

Re: Build order rationale page

2006-04-11 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
M.Canales.es wrote: Some days ago I send to Jeremy a patch with XML templates to describe all that stuff and to add in each package file the testsuite dependencies. Maybe both you should to work on that together ;-) Sorry for not replying on this thread before. A few things: 1) Manuel can

Re: Build order rationale page

2006-04-11 Thread M.Canales.es
El Martes, 11 de Abril de 2006 16:55, Jeremy Huntwork escribió: > > 1) Manuel can you re-send that email? I can't seem to find it right now. > I might have deleted it accidentally... :/ Searching it ... > 2) I think the page should be in the Appendix - not everyone will need > or want to read it

Get richer than your neighbor

2006-04-11 Thread support
Quit your job and invest with us http://1and1.com/blackprofitshyip.com Call us: +1 16305575612 Fax: +1 16035145563 Call us: Phone: 1-800-561-2656 x 106 Call us: Phone: 1-800-561-2656 Visit us: 700 Commerce Drive 5th Floor Oak Brook, IL 60523 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-d

LFS needs a new server.

2006-04-11 Thread Bruce Dubbs
This is a request for donations. The LFS server is creaking along poorly. It is a 750MHz/512MB Ram/2 x 9G SCSI system. It frequently has high load factors and out of memory problems. Right now, Gerard is funding the server hosting fees from the meager PayPal donations he receives and supplement

Server load on Belgarath

2006-04-11 Thread Bruce Dubbs
To all Editors: I've noticed that several Editors build one or more of the books on Belgarath. Since the performance of the system is marginal, I request that all builds be done on an external system. If you want to make the builds public, just tar the files and upload those. If you want to use

Re: Build order rationale page

2006-04-11 Thread M.Canales.es
El Martes, 11 de Abril de 2006 16:55, Jeremy Huntwork escribió: > 2) I think the page should be in the Appendix - not everyone will need > or want to read it. But we should definitely point to it within the main > text. Have a paragraph somewhere that stresses the importance of the > build order a

Re: Adding newer headers to llh (Was Re: merging udev_update branch)

2006-04-11 Thread Andrew Benton
Jim Gifford wrote: Another option here is to use the headers package I've been working with a lot of people. It compiles a base LFS and CLFS with no issues at all. http://ftp.jg555.com/headers/linux-headers-2.6.16.2.tar.bz2 I tried this and glibc failed to compile (in chapter 5) like this

Re: LFS needs a new server.

2006-04-11 Thread Matt Darcy
Bruce Dubbs wrote: This is a request for donations. The LFS server is creaking along poorly. It is a 750MHz/512MB Ram/2 x 9G SCSI system. It frequently has high load factors and out of memory problems. Right now, Gerard is funding the server hosting fees from the meager PayPal donations he re

Re: Adding newer headers to llh (Was Re: merging udev_update branch)

2006-04-11 Thread Andrew Benton
Andrew Benton wrote: Looking at linux/socket.h in the tarball, it looks like this #ifndef LINUX_SOCKET_H #include #endif Renaming the variable $new_header in some places fixes the issue for me. (I haven't had time to build with it yet) Andy --- /home/andy/headers 2006-04-11 07:24:04.

Re: LFS needs a new server.

2006-04-11 Thread Bryan Kadzban
Matt Darcy wrote: > Bruce Dubbs wrote: > >> I am soliciting donations to the LFS Server Fund. We only need >> $1000 US. Please consider giving whatever you can afford. > > Bruce, > > After speaking to Archaic, I understand your about $500 short of the > new dell box. > > I think - through my

Re: LFS needs a new server.

2006-04-11 Thread Robert Connolly
On April 11, 2006 05:39 pm, Bryan Kadzban wrote: > Matt Darcy wrote: > > Bruce Dubbs wrote: > >> I am soliciting donations to the LFS Server Fund. We only need > >> $1000 US. Please consider giving whatever you can afford. > > > > Bruce, > > > > After speaking to Archaic, I understand your about

Re: LFS needs a new server.

2006-04-11 Thread Gerard Beekmans
Robert Connolly wrote: I'm in for one hundred. It's pending at paypal until the 21st. Meaning it's pending on your end? I haven't seen anythign on my end here. -- Gerard Beekmans /* If Linux doesn't have the solution, you have the wrong problem */ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listi

Re: LFS needs a new server.

2006-04-11 Thread Robert Connolly
Paypal is processing it. Its a bank account transfer. Paypal should take it tommorrow, then they hold it for another week. Its like waiting for a check to clear. robert On April 11, 2006 06:20 pm, Gerard Beekmans wrote: > Robert Connolly wrote: > > I'm in for one hundred. It's pending at paypal

New server specs

2006-04-11 Thread Gerard Beekmans
Hi guys, First off, thank you all so very much for the support. Within just a few short hours of Bruce emailing earlier today I've received a lot of support in the form of donations and pledges. It means a lot to me personally as well. And it's still trickling in. I'll give all of you guys so

Re: LFS needs a new server.

2006-04-11 Thread Gerard Beekmans
Robert Connolly wrote: Paypal is processing it. Its a bank account transfer. Paypal should take it tommorrow, then they hold it for another week. Its like waiting for a check to clear. Ah I see. I've noted your pending donation down then in the budget so it'll be taken into account already.

Re: New server specs

2006-04-11 Thread Carsten Gehrke
My $0.02 on the drives: I have somewhere in the neighborhood of two dozen computers in my home office, mostly older generation servers bought on e-Bay. Aside from one SCSI drive that was DOA when I bought it, I have not had any failures, including the used drives. I have had a number of IDE

RE: New server specs

2006-04-11 Thread Jeremy Herbison
> As far as CPUs go, we have some options. Pentium 4, Pentium D, and Intel > Xeons are my three choices at the moment (I'm still not an AMD fan but > I'll consider it too) as they offer nice amounts of speed for reasonable > prices. The question is if we really need dual CPUs or not. They are > nic

Re: New server specs

2006-04-11 Thread Archaic
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 04:41:14PM -0600, Gerard Beekmans wrote: > > SCSI vs. SATA. I'm a SCSI fan but I've had lots of good success with > SATA too. Plus sides being that we can get more space for much less money. If going 1U, I recommend SCSI and the best fans you can buy. > As far as CPUs go

Re: Adding newer headers to llh (Was Re: merging udev_update branch)

2006-04-11 Thread DJ Lucas
Jim Gifford wrote: Another option here is to use the headers package I've been working with a lot of people. It compiles a base LFS and CLFS with no issues at all.http://ftp.jg555.com/headers/linux-headers-2.6.16.2.tar.bz2, or roll your own by using http://ftp.jg555.com/headers/headers. Jim

Test, please ignore.

2006-04-11 Thread DJ Lucas
Please ignore. -- DJ Lucas -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: Adding newer headers to llh (Was Re: merging udev_update branch)

2006-04-11 Thread Jim Gifford
DJ Lucas wrote: Jim Gifford wrote: Another option here is to use the headers package I've been working with a lot of people. It compiles a base LFS and CLFS with no issues at all.http://ftp.jg555.com/headers/linux-headers-2.6.16.2.tar.bz2, or roll your own by using http://ftp.jg555.com/headers

Tripwire

2006-04-11 Thread Bruce Dubbs
I've been working on Tripwire. The latest version is 2.4.0.1 (Dec 05) but it is still pretty crappy. It won't compile with GCC4. I created a patch and will use that. It still generates a huge number of warnings. The problem is that it won't install without what appears to be extraordinary effo

Re: Adding newer headers to llh (Was Re: merging udev_update branch)

2006-04-11 Thread DJ Lucas
Jim Gifford wrote: Yes, building both GCC 4.1 and Glibc 2.4 with them. I also have a few others that have built it also. Add another. Only minor changes to the LFS build, lsb patch for util linux, glibc-libidn dir change, gcc specifics taken from Greg, groff 1.19.2, and probably a couple o

Re: [alpha + udev_update] ICA Results In

2006-04-11 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 4/10/06, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'll make another run later. I'm doing a run with all the testsuites. > In automake right now. I'll be crossing my fingers that this won't > be a problem. The issue with pruning too much of the filesystem has been resolved. ICA and test