Archaic wrote:
I would like to hear from Jim and everyone working on the header project
regarding this possibility:
Find the headers that llh currently lacks that glibc-2.3.6 and
linux-2.6.16.x both support and patch them into llh. The only thing that
comes to mind is inotify support. Headers that have become drastically
different are a concern, though, as that adds to the testing time.
I've had excellent results with the headers produced by the headers
script, really good, however bottom line is it still being developed
(changes to the output headers are still happening), which as fast as it
matures is still not really solid enough to start looking at a release.
However as in your pervious message moving them into trunk could be a
good idea.
I've been using them for cross-builds for a while which it pretty much a
constatnt trunk at the moment, and I've had few serious problems.
Another issue is while these headers are progressing at an excellent
speed - the direction / use of headers (what is LFS going to do for
headers in the future) has not really been discussed properly yet.
Matt
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
