Hello,
It seems that the linux-libc-headers package isn't being updated as
frequently as it once was. Two questions:
1) I realize it may not be absolutely necessary to have matching
linux-libc-headers and kernel versions, but wouldn't it be more
advantageous to have up-to-date sanitized head
On 11/10/05, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It seems that the linux-libc-headers package isn't being updated as
> frequently as it once was. Two questions:
>
> 1) I realize it may not be absolutely necessary to have matching
> linux-libc-headers and kernel versions, but wouldn't it
Tushar Teredesai wrote:
On 11/10/05, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It seems that the linux-libc-headers package isn't being updated as
frequently as it once was. Two questions:
1) I realize it may not be absolutely necessary to have matching
linux-libc-headers and kernel versions,
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
It seems that the linux-libc-headers package isn't being updated as
frequently as it once was.
I thought that too, and also found the svnweb interface that Tush linked
to. Now, whether they actually release something based on 2.6.14
remains to be seen - maybe someone
On 11/10/05, Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
>
> > It seems that the linux-libc-headers package isn't being updated as
> > frequently as it once was.
>
> I thought that too, and also found the svnweb interface that Tush linked
> to. Now, whether they actually re
On 11/10/05, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tushar Teredesai wrote:
> > On 11/10/05, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > BTW, looks like they made a 2.6.12.0 release but it is not on thier
> > download site.
>
> Sure it is. :) And it's what we've been using in trunk for a w
On Thursday 10 November 2005 18:48, Tushar Teredesai wrote:
> Does someone have an idea on what the source based distros are using?
Gentoo uses 2.6.11-r2 (as of lkast weekend).
--
Mid-Twenties Breakdown:
A period of mental collapse occurring in one's twenties,
often caused by an inability
Tushar Teredesai wrote:
Does someone have an idea on what the source based distros are using?
Gentoo appears to be using their own, I think -
http://packages.gentoo.org/ebuilds/?linux-headers-2.6.11-r2. I can't
see any links to the actual tarball though that would enable a full
comparison,
> I was just curious about how many have tried jhalfs at this point and
> what comments they might have as to its functionality and/or usefulness.
I just finnished building the SVN Book, everything went fine (except
some gcc-patches the script tried to download, which weren't there. [and
weren' n
Matthew Burgess wrote:
Tushar Teredesai wrote:
Does someone have an idea on what the source based distros are using?
Gentoo appears to be using their own, I think -
http://packages.gentoo.org/ebuilds/?linux-headers-2.6.11-r2. I can't
see any links to the actual tarball though that would e
On 11/10/05, Thomas Pegg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matthew Burgess wrote:
> > Tushar Teredesai wrote:
> >
> >> Does someone have an idea on what the source based distros are using?
> >
> >
> > Gentoo appears to be using their own, I think -
> > http://packages.gentoo.org/ebuilds/?linux-headers-2
On 11/10/05, Tushar Teredesai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/10/05, Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> >
> > > It seems that the linux-libc-headers package isn't being updated as
> > > frequently as it once was.
> >
> > I thought that too, and also found the
12 matches
Mail list logo
