Tushar Teredesai wrote:
I am with Archaic. If the stable releases of some packages (especially
something as critical as glibc) are not gcc4 ready, perhaps we have
been hasty in upgrading to gcc4?
I know you placed emphasis on glibc, but waiting for all packages to
release gcc4 compatible vers
Hi guys,
As you know, I'm still a little unsure of how the udev and hotplug
things all hang together (or not as the case may be!). Recent
developments in udev suggest that the hotplug package might not be
required anymore as udev can handle hotplug events itself.
However, RELEASE-NOTES says
Matthew Burgess wrote:
> Incidentally, I'd love for someone to draw a nice looking graphic to
> show how kernel events, udev, hotplug, modules, etc. are all related and
> how they function together. If a similar graphic could be drawn without
> the hotplug component in there, a direct comparison
Richard A Downing wrote:
No, but I'll buy beer (possibly even Vodka) for anyone who does it (you
travel to my pub).
Ah, funny you should mention that...see lfs-chat for the details!
Isn't it strange how every other engineering disipline goes in for lots
of useful diagrams, but as soon as you
Matthew Burgess wrote:
As you know, I'm still a little unsure of how the udev and hotplug
things all hang together (or not as the case may be!). Recent
developments in udev suggest that the hotplug package might not be
required anymore as udev can handle hotplug events itself.
Right. But it
Hi guys,
As reported and confirmed in the thread at
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/blfs-support/2005-September/056510.html,
cpio-2.6 fails to build the testsuite using a gcc-4.0.1 compiler. A
solution is also given in that email, which has also been verified as
correct by Alexande
Richard A Downing wrote these words on 09/19/05 09:21 CST:
> Isn't it strange how every other engineering disipline goes in for lots
> of useful diagrams, but as soon as you get to the OpenSource movement
> everything MUST BE just words. Nuts. Understanding is more important
> than Sacred Gnus !
Randy McMurchy([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 09:54:08AM -0500:
> Richard A Downing wrote these words on 09/19/05 09:21 CST:
>
> > Isn't it strange how every other engineering disipline goes in for lots
> > of useful diagrams, but as soon as you get to the OpenSource movement
> > everythi
Matthew Burgess wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> As reported and confirmed in the thread at
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/blfs-support/2005-September/056510.html,
> cpio-2.6 fails to build the testsuite using a gcc-4.0.1 compiler. A
> solution is also given in that email, which has also been v
On 9/19/05, Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Richard A Downing wrote:
...
> Ah, but now we have the catch-22. One needs the understanding in order
> to be able to draw the diagram. Those that have the understanding don't
> need the diagram!
>
> Regards,
>
> Matt.
that just sings po
On 9/19/2005 10:54, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> http://www.gtkmm.org/jhbuild_dot_gnomemm.png
That's sick man!
~Jason
--
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Richard A Downing wrote these words on 09/19/05 09:21 CST:
>
>
>>Isn't it strange how every other engineering disipline goes in for lots
>>of useful diagrams, but as soon as you get to the OpenSource movement
>>everything MUST BE just words. Nuts. Understanding is more i
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 05:24:01PM +0100, Richard A Downing wrote:
> Anyone got a similar KDE photo?
Not exactly, but this is a lame ASCII-art version, based on current BLFS
(SVN) dependencies:
| | ||
+---+---+---++
|
kdebase
Hey Guys,
The FAQ needs some attention. And it would be nice if we had someone to
maintain it regularly again. For example:
"Kernel panic: VFS: unable to mount root fs
There are several reasons why the kernel might be unable to mount
the root filesystem.
* Did you specify the c
Jeremy Huntwork wrote these words on 09/19/05 13:55 CST:
> There are others that are just as outdated. Anyway, just thought I'd
> mention it. I don't have the time to put into it, but perhaps someone
> else does?
Months ago I volunteered to Matt to maintain the FAQ, but he politely
said that it
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
There are others that are just as outdated. Anyway, just thought I'd
mention it. I don't have the time to put into it, but perhaps someone
else does?
I would volunteer but feel unfit for the job as I don't do much support
via lfs-support or #lfs-support. Until then I
Justin Knierim wrote these words on 09/19/05 14:20 CST:
[snip]
Is the clock on your machine perhaps running about 20 minutes fast?
--
Randy
rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3]
[GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686]
14:04:00 up 170 days, 13:
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Months ago I volunteered to Matt to maintain the FAQ, but he politely
said that it didn't need a maintainer and to just in patches to -dev
for any updates I felt might be needed.
Hrm. That sounds somewhat familiar. Though I had forgotten it if I had
read it.
Well, the
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Justin Knierim wrote these words on 09/19/05 14:20 CST:
[snip]
Is the clock on your machine perhaps running about 20 minutes fast?
Justin actually lives in the future. You didn't know? ;)
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromsc
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Jeremy Huntwork wrote these words on 09/19/05 13:55 CST:
There are others that are just as outdated. Anyway, just thought I'd
mention it. I don't have the time to put into it, but perhaps someone
else does?
Months ago I volunteered to Matt to maintain the FAQ, but he po
Matthew Burgess wrote these words on 09/19/05 14:29 CST:
> Wow, I must have been in an "Thou shalt not delegate anything" mood at
> the time! If you are still willing to maintain it, that'd be great, if
> not I'll open the position up for someone else to take on.
Not sure it was like that, but
Matthew Burgess wrote:
Wow, I must have been in an "Thou shalt not delegate anything" mood at
the time! If you are still willing to maintain it, that'd be great, if
not I'll open the position up for someone else to take on.
Randy would need to be added to the svnwww and lfswww groups.
--
J
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Anyway, sure, I'm volunteering again. :-)
OK, that's great, thanks. You've now got commit privs to the website
repository (www2), so feel free to tackle it whenever you have the time.
If you're not subscribed to website@linuxfromscratch.org, you might
want to do tha
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Randy would need to be added to the svnwww and lfswww groups.
Is lfswww still being used for website stuff? If so I'd rather it die a
quick death by having any scripts or other files to be owned by svnwww
instead.
Regards,
Matt.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailm
Matthew Burgess wrote:
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Randy would need to be added to the svnwww and lfswww groups.
Is lfswww still being used for website stuff? If so I'd rather it die a
quick death by having any scripts or other files to be owned by svnwww
instead.
Yes, I believe it's still b
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Is the clock on your machine perhaps running about 20 minutes fast?
Thanks a lot Randy, it was indeed fast. Fixed now.
Justin
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Jim Gifford wrote:
After some discussion with Gerard, he has requested I prepare a proposal
to the LFS community concerning the Cross-LFS book.
Have we reached any sort of decision with this? Gerard, Matt, Jim?
--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linux
"Do you still think the LSB has some value?"
http://www.livejournal.com/users/udrepper/8511.html
--
Alexander E. Patrakov
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> Matthew Burgess wrote:
>
>> Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
>>
>>> Randy would need to be added to the svnwww and lfswww groups.
>>
>>
>>
>> Is lfswww still being used for website stuff? If so I'd rather it die
>> a quick death by hav
Haven't heard anything except for the community's feedback. I know
Gerard has received the message and is reviewing it, per our
conversation over the weekend.
--
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
LFS User # 2577
Registered Linux User # 299986
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/li
Matthew Burgess wrote:
Incidentally, I'd love for someone to draw a nice looking graphic to
show how kernel events, udev, hotplug, modules, etc. are all related and
how they function together. If a similar graphic could be drawn without
the hotplug component in there, a direct comparison woul
Hi guys,
While building the ftp repo, I found a incorrectly built link, and also
a couple patches out of alphabetical order. Here is a svn diff.
Justin
Index: materials/sparc64/patches.xml
===
--- materials/sparc64/patches.xml
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
Note that /sbin/hotplug is NOT on this diagram, because we immediately
set the hotplug handler in /proc/sys/kernel/hotplug to /sbin/udevsend
In my experience it doesn't matter what's in /proc/sys/kernel/hotplug.
I've tested this with -
I switch the computer of
33 matches
Mail list logo
