Re: Section 3.3 - Required Patches

2005-09-11 Thread Matthew Burgess
Bruce Dubbs wrote: I was checking my list of patches against the book and found it a bit difficult to check the names because they are not in alphabetical order: Thanks Bruce, this should be sorted out in r6834. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromsc

Re: Sed assumptions

2005-09-11 Thread Thomas Trepl
Ken Moffat wrote: > OK, you guys have finally dragged me kicking and screaming towards > building with gcc4 (well-known old compilers? I love 'em!). And sitting > in the chapter 5 gcc pass 2 instructions I see some 'sed -i' commands. > Me, I love these, but have we agreed to raise the bar for h

libmad pkgconfig

2005-09-11 Thread Thomas Trepl
Hi, I knew there was a thread about the libmad-pkgconfig issue. Tushar has created a patch but it disappeared. Manually creating the /usr/lib/pkgconfig/mad.pc file lets cdrdao see the the libmad as installed, otherwise mp3 support in cdrdao gets disabled. I have created the mad.pc with following

Misspell? :)

2005-09-11 Thread David Fix
I'm not sure if this is the right list to do this in, but I noticed that in the netiquette section of the book (http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/#netiquette), publicly is mis-spelled... :) It is currently spelled "publicaly". :) Dave -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/

Re: Misspell? :)

2005-09-11 Thread Archaic
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 11:04:17AM -0400, David Fix wrote: > I'm not sure if this is the right list to do this in, but I noticed that in > the netiquette section of the book > (http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/#netiquette), publicly is > mis-spelled... :) It is currently spelled "publicaly".

Re: Misspell? :)

2005-09-11 Thread Matthew Burgess
David Fix wrote: publicly is mis-spelled... :) It is currently spelled "publicaly". :) No it's not - http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=publicly. There's a synonym of "publically", but nowhere can I find your "corrected" spelling of "publicaly"! Matt. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org

Re: Misspell? :)

2005-09-11 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Matthew Burgess wrote: David Fix wrote: publicly is mis-spelled... :) It is currently spelled "publicaly". :) No it's not - http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=publicly. There's a synonym of "publically", but nowhere can I find your "corrected" spelling of "publicaly"! Er. Matt.

Re: Misspell? :)

2005-09-11 Thread Matthew Burgess
Jeremy Huntwork wrote: Er. Matt. Read his message again. I'm afraid you misread it. Well, in my defense the OP could have been worded much better. I'll admit to not having actually visited the link, which would have pointed out which way round David was mentioning the words. Oh well, guess

Re: Misspell? :)

2005-09-11 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Matthew Burgess wrote: Jeremy Huntwork wrote: Er. Matt. Read his message again. I'm afraid you misread it. Well, in my defense the OP could have been worded much better. I'll admit to not having actually visited the link, which would have pointed out which way round David was mentioning t

RE: Misspell? :)

2005-09-11 Thread David Fix
> The correct list would be [EMAIL PROTECTED] I've forwarded > your original message. Thanks. > > -- > Archaic Thanks Archaic. :) Dave -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: Misspell? :)

2005-09-11 Thread Archaic
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 11:38:13AM -0400, Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > > It's OK, we still like you. ;) We do? :) -- Archaic Want control, education, and security from your operating system? Hardened Linux From Scratch http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/l

Discrepancy in Structure, Grammar Suggestion in 1.1

2005-09-11 Thread Erik Glyttov
Found two "issues" while recently (re)reading through LFS 6.1: In the Preface, the Structure section includes "making a partition" under Part II - Preparing for the Build. However, looking at the Table of Contents, "Preparing a New Partition" currently (and mistakenly?) falls under Part I - In

Re: Discrepancy in Structure, Grammar Suggestion in 1.1

2005-09-11 Thread Archaic
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 04:09:06PM -1000, Erik Glyttov wrote: > Found two "issues" while recently (re)reading through LFS 6.1: > > In the Preface, the Structure section includes "making a partition" > under Part II - Preparing for the Build. However, looking at the Table > of Contents, "Preparin

Re: Discrepancy in Structure, Grammar Suggestion in 1.1

2005-09-11 Thread John Kelly
On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 20:29:38 -0600, Archaic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> In section 1.1, How to Build an LFS System, the following sounds (at >> least to my ears) grammatically odd: "While this may initially seem like >> a lot of work to isolate the new system from the host distribution, a >>

Re: Discrepancy in Structure, Grammar Suggestion in 1.1

2005-09-11 Thread Erik Glyttov
Archaic wrote: On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 04:09:06PM -1000, Erik Glyttov wrote: In the Preface, the Structure section includes "making a partition" under Part II - Preparing for the Build. However, looking at the Table of Contents, "Preparing a New Partition" currently (and mistakenly?) falls und

Re: BZ1616 Udev rules

2005-09-11 Thread Archaic
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 11:17:23PM -0500, DJ Lucas wrote: > In the bug, there is talk of streamlining the device list for what is > used in LFS. (Comment #7) ALSA can probably go now, as I added it into > BLFS to allow for volume restore, but I would like to prepare for > whatever else will be rem