LFS-6.1-pre1 released

The Linux From Scratch community is pleased to announce the release of LFS 6.1-pre1. This pre-release for the upcoming final 6.1 revision of the book includes a large number of package upgrades and security fixes. It also includes a fair amount of editorial work on the explantory material throug

gawk-3.1.4 and glibc-2.3.5: broken combination?

Dear List, H'mmm - I tried searching for a prior posting on this subject and got Index file error: Index file 'lfs-dev.swish' and property file 'lfs-dev.swish.prop' are not related. But that's by the way. The problem was discovered while working through blfs (building libgpg-1.0), but the pr

Re: gawk-3.1.4 and glibc-2.3.5: broken combination?

Bernard Leak wrote: Dear List, H'mmm - I tried searching for a prior posting on this subject and got Index file error: Index file 'lfs-dev.swish' and property file 'lfs-dev.swish.prop' are not related. Thanks for the report on this. We were having trouble with our search engine earlier. Sti

Re: gawk-3.1.4 and glibc-2.3.5: broken combination?

Bernard Leak wrote: cat > test.awk < Is this line correct? I get: gawk: test.awk:5: //^#/ { next; } gawk: test.awk:5: ^ syntax error -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: gawk-3.1.4 and glibc-2.3.5: broken combination?

Matthew Burgess wrote: Bernard Leak wrote: cat > test.awk < Is this line correct? I get: gawk: test.awk:5: //^#/ { next; } gawk: test.awk:5: ^ syntax error OK, removing the extraneous '/' at the start of that line produces: { 7, "GPG_ERR_E2BIG" }, { 114, "GPG_ERR_EALREADY" }, { 5

Re: gawk-3.1.4 and glibc-2.3.5: broken combination?

Dear List, sorry to lose the threading - I asked a question about avoiding this in the recommended place (a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) and found it had been sent to a mailing list and bounced from it! [Thanks] Thanks in particular to Matthew Burgess

Re: gawk-3.1.4 and glibc-2.3.5: broken combination?

Using glibc-2.3.5 (compiled with gcc-3.4.4, binutils-2.16{,.1}, linux-2.6.{11,12.2}) and gawk-3.1.4 I'm unable to reproduce this I get { 7, "GPG_ERR_E2BIG" }, { 114, "GPG_ERR_EALREADY" }, { 52, "GPG_ERR_EBADE" }, { 9, "GPG_ERR_EBADF" }, { 77, "GPG_ERR_EBADFD" }, From Andrew -- http:/

Re: gawk-3.1.4 and glibc-2.3.5: broken combination?

Bernard Leak wrote: cat > test.awk < Are you sure your syntax here is correct? On my sparc machine which is running glibc-2.3.5, gcc-3.4.4 and binutils-2.16.1, I get the following output when running your test: { , "GPG_ERR_" }, { , "GPG_ERR_" }, { , "GPG_ERR_" }, { , "GPG_ERR_" },

Re: gawk-3.1.4 and glibc-2.3.5: broken combination?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bernard Leak wrote: > cat > test.awk < test.awk << "EOF" otherwise the shell tries to interpret the input (basically in this case it replaces "$1" and "$2" with empty strings) - -- Anderson Lizardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/ -

Re: gawk-3.1.4 and glibc-2.3.5: broken combination?

Bernard Leak wrote: I compiled libgpg-error-1.0 (http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/libg/libgpg-error/libgpg-error_1.0.orig.tar.gz) and it worked fine, so did `make check`. Have you tried recompiling gawk?? From Andrew -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http:/

Re: gawk-3.1.4 and glibc-2.3.5: broken combination?

Dear List, err... Andrew Fyfe clearly doesn't have the same problem that I see (and neither, I suppose did whoever set up the instructions for blfs 6.0 - which is why I thought it was glibc-2.3.5 related). That he goes on not to see the consequential problem (which I saw first) with li

Re: gawk-3.1.4 and glibc-2.3.5: broken combination?

Bernard Leak wrote: He asks Have you tried recompiling gawk?? I've already produced six distinct builds, many of them compiled several times (for one reason or another). How many more times would he like me to try? Does he recommend any particular clothes, or phases of the moon? Sorry stupid

Re: gawk-3.1.4 and glibc-2.3.5: broken combination?

On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 09:02:15PM +0100, Bernard Leak wrote: > > I'll try re-building glibc (O joy!) and see what I get. For this is have much relevance for LFS, and to help narrow down the variables, would you mind either building the current development version or the 6.1-pre1 version (with on

Re: gawk-3.1.4 and glibc-2.3.5: broken combination?

Bernard Leak wrote: Dear List, The problem was discovered while working through blfs (building libgpg-1.0), OK, could someone who has a few spare cycles and a machine to do so please build an LFS-6.1-pre1 system by the book? Then run the following script and post the output? On my system,

Re: gawk-3.1.4 and glibc-2.3.5: broken combination?

Matthew Burgess wrote: OK, could someone who has a few spare cycles and a machine to do so please build an LFS-6.1-pre1 system by the book? I have a build of 6.1 Version TESTING-20050616 I don't think there have been any changes other than text. { 7, "GPG_ERR_E2BIG" }, { 114, "GPG_ERR_EAL

Re: gawk-3.1.4 and glibc-2.3.5: broken combination?

David Jensen wrote: Matthew Burgess wrote: OK, could someone who has a few spare cycles and a machine to do so please build an LFS-6.1-pre1 system by the book? I have a build of 6.1 Version TESTING-20050616 I don't think there have been any changes other than text. Aside from an upgrade

Re: gawk-3.1.4 and glibc-2.3.5: broken combination?

i also had this problem. after applying the fedora gawk patches the problem has gone http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gawk/ my system gcc 4.0.1-pre, hjb binutils, glibc 2.3.5, cross-lfs wfg Mario -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.o

Re: gawk-3.1.4 and glibc-2.3.5: broken combination?

Mario Fetka wrote: i also had this problem. after applying the fedora gawk patches the problem has gone http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gawk/ Thanks for the pointer. The dfa_cache patch solved the issue for me. Bernard, could you apply the following to gawk-3.1.4 and report your r

Re: gawk-3.1.4 and glibc-2.3.5: broken combination?

Might be another stupid question have you got LC_ALL set? try cat test.in | LC_ALL=C gawk -f test.awk From Andrew -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: gawk-3.1.4 and glibc-2.3.5: broken combination?

Andrew Fyfe wrote: Might be another stupid question have you got LC_ALL set? try cat test.in | LC_ALL=C gawk -f test.awk Ah-ha! LC_ALL wasn't set, but LANG was set to en_GB.utf8 (yes, Alexander, I know!). Setting LANG=C did the trick for me. Thanks Andrew! Regards, Matt. -- http://linuxf

Re: gawk-3.1.4 and glibc-2.3.5: broken combination?

Matthew Burgess wrote: Mario Fetka wrote: i also had this problem. after applying the fedora gawk patches the problem has gone http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gawk/ Thanks for the pointer. The dfa_cache patch solved the issue for me. Bernard, could you apply the following to gaw

LFS 6.1 GCC Testsuite results link

The GCC-Pass 2 page still has a link to an old version's (3.4.1) testsuite results - this should be changed to http://linuxfromscratch.org/~archaic/logs-6.1-pre1/chapter6/gcc-3.4.3 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See

Re: LFS 6.1 GCC Testsuite results link

On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 09:40:43PM -0400, Chris Staub wrote: > The GCC-Pass 2 page still has a link to an old version's (3.4.1) > testsuite results - this should be changed to Good eye! Thanks! -- Archaic Want control, education, and security from your operating system? Hardened Linux From Sc