Archaic wrote:
We just did a prerelease. It uses 2.3.4.
Maybe I should have specified. Usually when I refer to something LFS
uses, I mean whatever is in SVN currently
--
Gerard Beekmans
/* If Linux doesn't have the solution, you have the wrong problem */
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/ma
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 05:34:47PM -0700, Gerard Beekmans wrote:
>
> If I understand correctly, Glibc-2.3.6 already has the fixes applied.
> LFS uses Glibc-2.3.6 so this probably is a moot point as far as LFS
> development goes, correct?
We just did a prerelease. It uses 2.3.4.
--
Archaic
Wa
Just a follow-up as the thread continued on blfs-support.
If I understand correctly, Glibc-2.3.6 already has the fixes applied.
LFS uses Glibc-2.3.6 so this probably is a moot point as far as LFS
development goes, correct?
I haven't tested this with Glibc-2.3.6 yet but I believe others have
DJ Lucas wrote:
Well, I'm just slightly red faced right now. :-) "I'm almost there"
and then all of a sudden I can't test it any more...but it's back again!
Such an obvious oversight. Yes, the problem does exist. I've got
glibc building now.
Thanks for the cluebat. I guess I'll ge
On Sat, 2005-11-19 at 23:18 -0600, DJ Lucas wrote:
> CC'd to LFS-Dev for review:
>
> Gerard Beekmans wrote:
>
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /opt/openoffice.org2.0/program/soffice -display :0.0
> > Inconsistency detected by ld.so: ../sysdeps/generic/dl-tls.c: 72:
> > _dl_next_tls_modid: Assertion
Archaic wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 12:39:52AM -0600, DJ Lucas wrote:
I couldn't reproduce the problem using the debian supplied testcase.
Did you do the
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=".:/usr/local/lib:/usr/X11R6/lib:/usr/lib:/lib"
part?
Well, I'm just slightly red faced right now. :-) "I'm
Gerard Beekmans wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /opt/openoffice.org2.0/program/soffice -display :0.0
Inconsistency detected by ld.so: ../sysdeps/generic/dl-tls.c: 72:
_dl_next_tls_modid: Assertion `result <=
_rtld_local._dl_tls_max_dtv_idx' failed!
I couldn't reproduce the problem using the de
CC'd to LFS-Dev for review:
Gerard Beekmans wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /opt/openoffice.org2.0/program/soffice -display :0.0
Inconsistency detected by ld.so: ../sysdeps/generic/dl-tls.c: 72:
_dl_next_tls_modid: Assertion `result <=
_rtld_local._dl_tls_max_dtv_idx' failed!
In fact, I ca
