On Monday 26 May 2008 22:37:33 Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 07:19:49AM -0600, Gerard Beekmans wrote:
> >
> > > Why dhclient over dhcpcd? I don't really care much, but my argument is
> > >
> > Not real reason why I mentioned one over the other. dhclient is easier
> > to type th
On May 30, 2008, at 6:02 AM, Randy McMurchy wrote:
Zachary Kotlarek wrote these words on 05/29/08 20:24 CST:
http://zinux.cynicbytrade.com/svn/devel/dhcp/iproute2.diff
I'm not sure this patch qualifies as an LFS patch. Patches in LFS
are used to fix something that is broken or provi
Zachary Kotlarek wrote these words on 05/29/08 20:24 CST:
> http://zinux.cynicbytrade.com/svn/devel/dhcp/iproute2.diff
I'm not sure this patch qualifies as an LFS patch. Patches in LFS
are used to fix something that is broken or provide required
functionality that is not available without t
Zachary Kotlarek wrote:
>
> On May 29, 2008, at 8:24 PM, Zachary Kotlarek wrote:
>
> Now with a trailing newline, so the link is reasonable:
> http://zinux.cynicbytrade.com/svn/devel/dhcp/iproute2.diff
>
> Zach
>
Cool, thanks. I haven't tested yours yet, but I did send a link to
dhcp-hackers
On May 29, 2008, at 8:24 PM, Zachary Kotlarek wrote:
Now with a trailing newline, so the link is reasonable:
http://zinux.cynicbytrade.com/svn/devel/dhcp/iproute2.diff
Zach
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
On May 26, 2008, at 11:42 AM, Dan Nicholson wrote:
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 8:39 AM, DJ Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
DHCP-4.0.0 is out too and the iproute2 patch will have to be
updated (or reintroduce net-tools).
Someone should really try to upstream the iproute2 patch. Every distro
u
> I need ppp, I have no use for dhcp.
PPP. I admit to often forgetting about that one. The BLFS book handles
PPP installation of course and also touches on GPRS and EDGE setup. PPP
setup is not as straight-forward as DHCP (ppp for dialup, or for pppoe
and other slight variations thereof). It mi
> know about). The current BLFS development book has dhcpcd; I didn't
> look to see if it also has dhclient / pump / others.
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/basicnet/dhcpclient.html
> A workaround for that issue is to have an "alternatives to the XXX DHCP
We'd have to yes, people
On Thu, 22 May 2008 18:15:40 -0600
Gerard Beekmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One of the solutions that came from the udev discussion the last few
> days was to move dhclient from BLFS to LFS. Or leave it in BLFS but
> also install it in LFS.
>
> I know we've had the discussions before in the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Gerard Beekmans wrote:
> One of the solutions that came from the udev discussion the last few
> days was to move dhclient from BLFS to LFS. Or leave it in BLFS but also
> install it in LFS.
One possible issue would be that there are lots of dif
One of the solutions that came from the udev discussion the last few
days was to move dhclient from BLFS to LFS. Or leave it in BLFS but also
install it in LFS.
I know we've had the discussions before in the past. I'm honestly not
sure anymore what the outcome of that was.
Gerard
--
http://
11 matches
Mail list logo
