Re: continue batle with cross-lfs :)

2005-05-23 Thread John Profic
Jeremy Huntwork wrote: John Profic wrote: Sorry, for confusion, but I mean book titled i386/x64_64 not standalone x86_64 (which I notice is *broken* :)) You mean this one? http://linuxfromscratch.org/~jhuntwork/cross-lfs/x86/ If so, the title for that one is 'Intel/AMD x86' and it's assumed th

Re: continue batle with cross-lfs :)

2005-05-23 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
John Profic wrote: Sorry, for confusion, but I mean book titled i386/x64_64 not standalone x86_64 (which I notice is *broken* :)) You mean this one? http://linuxfromscratch.org/~jhuntwork/cross-lfs/x86/ If so, the title for that one is 'Intel/AMD x86' and it's assumed that you're building 32-

Re: continue batle with cross-lfs :)

2005-05-23 Thread John Profic
Jeremy Huntwork wrote: You really shouldn't be trying to build cross-lfs from what it is currently in the x86_64 book. Did you see the note at the beginning that the book is broken? We haven't even *started* editing that one yet. (I think it was mostly just pages from other books dumped into p

Re: continue batle with cross-lfs :)

2005-05-23 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
John Profic wrote: I'm continue trying to build lfs by intructions from cross-lfs on x86_64. Currently I finish temp-tools part, and have some notices: 1) Gcc, compiled by instructions from cross-lfs-x86 uses /lib64 even build with enable-multilib=no, so no one just compiled program cannot run

continue batle with cross-lfs :)

2005-05-23 Thread John Profic
I'm continue trying to build lfs by intructions from cross-lfs on x86_64. Currently I finish temp-tools part, and have some notices: 1) Gcc, compiled by instructions from cross-lfs-x86 uses /lib64 even build with enable-multilib=no, so no one just compiled program cannot run at all (using of cou