Re: bash-3.1 and --without-bash-malloc

Jim Gifford wrote: Matthew Burgess wrote: When bash-3.1 went into the book did anyone test whether or not '--without-bash-malloc' still causes the segfaults that the book claims is the reason we use the switch? Tried it in CLFS didn't work, the errors still happen, it caused a complete lock

Re: bash-3.1 and --without-bash-malloc

Matthew Burgess wrote: Hi folks, When bash-3.1 went into the book did anyone test whether or not '--without-bash-malloc' still causes the segfaults that the book claims is the reason we use the switch? If not, I'd prefer we drop the switch, as the configure script leads me to think that the

bash-3.1 and --without-bash-malloc

Hi folks, When bash-3.1 went into the book did anyone test whether or not '--without-bash-malloc' still causes the segfaults that the book claims is the reason we use the switch? If not, I'd prefer we drop the switch, as the configure script leads me to think that the author believes bash sh