Matthew Burgess wrote:
Hi folks,

When bash-3.1 went into the book did anyone test whether or not '--without-bash-malloc' still causes the segfaults that the book claims is the reason we use the switch? If not, I'd prefer we drop the switch, as the configure script leads me to think that the author believes bash should provide its own malloc implementation on Linux. And, of course, if it still causes segfaults then those need reporting upstream :-)

Regards,

Matt.
Tried it in CLFS didn't work, the errors still happen, it caused a complete lockup on one architecture.

--
------
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

LFS User # 2577
Registered Linux User # 299986

--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to